PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1) (original) (raw)
Howard Lovatt howard.lovatt at iee.org
Thu Mar 19 00:45:56 PDT 2009
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
2009/3/19 Reinier Zwitserloot <reinier at zwitserloot.com>:
Why do you feel waiting is a better idea?
Unless you have some sort of language improvement in mind which is going to become impossible if SMI is added, I'd argue the reverse: Bigger changes should be introduced in bits and pieces if each piece is individually useful.
Just caution because a Trait proposal hasn't been put forward, outside coin scope, so I don't want to see a good Trait proposal compromised by a change introduced now. It probably isn't a big deal though if source went in (source would give you a get out of jail and allow the Trait proposal to be incompatible if need be). Same comment for the return this proposal.
-- Howard.
- Previous message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Next message: PROPOSAL: Static Methods in Interfaces (v1.1)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]