Review request for 5049299 (original) (raw)

Martin Buchholz martinrb at google.com
Sat Jun 6 02:13:07 UTC 2009

Michael,

I think the best way to handle the coordination is in two steps. I'd like to get my Linux-clone changes in first (you should review, I will commit) and then we switch hats and I will review your Solaris changes. It seems best to do this in two steps: to better place blame when it breaks (this is very tricky stuff to get right). If you agree, please review my posted changes.

Aside: Instead of griping about the missing execvpe, I filed a bug against glibc, and was surprised to find that Ulrich Drepper had implemented it a couple of days later. It will probably be in glibc-2.11. Perhaps in 5 years we can use it ourselves...). Thanks, Uli!

Martin

On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 07:29, Michael McMahon <Michael.McMahon at sun.com>wrote:

Martin,

I had done something similar with clone & exec for Linux, but hadn't got round to testing it. So, it seems reasonable to take yours. Do you want to send me your updated versions of processmd.c and the test? I can take care of the merge with the Solaris code. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/attachments/20090605/f2db74a6/attachment.html>

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list