JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn? (original) (raw)
Paul Benedict pbenedict at apache.org
Fri Oct 9 15:26:55 UTC 2009
- Previous message: JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
- Next message: JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
For the background on my reasoning, the popular shift towards dynamic languages makes me wonder how far off a C#-like dynamic feature is for Java too. I hedge my bet that it will eventually happen -- years upon years away -- when more serious use cases are found. Thus, to prevent the case of split packages (java.dyn and java.lang.dyn), I chose to bring up the discussion.
Ben and John, thank you for your responses. It is good to understand your vantage.
Paul
- Previous message: JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
- Next message: JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]