JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn? (original) (raw)
Ulf Zibis Ulf.Zibis at gmx.de
Fri Oct 9 19:52:28 UTC 2009
- Previous message: JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
- Next message: Review request for 6612680 (Remove classloader dependency on jkernel)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I would name it javax.dyn.
-Ulf
Am 04.10.2009 06:43, Paul Benedict schrieb:
I've always found it a bit perplexing that java.lang was never chosen for the parent package of the Dynamic API. Why is that? Dynamic types are now "part of the language" as proven by spec itself and exotic identifiers. Will this be reconsidered?
Paul
- Previous message: JSR-292: Why not java.lang.dyn?
- Next message: Review request for 6612680 (Remove classloader dependency on jkernel)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]