RFR (S) CR 8016236: Class.getGenericInterfaces performance improvement (original) (raw)
Aleksey Shipilev aleksey.shipilev at oracle.com
Mon Jun 17 08:06:18 UTC 2013
- Previous message: RFR (S) CR 8016236: Class.getGenericInterfaces performance improvement
- Next message: RFR (S) CR 8016236: Class.getGenericInterfaces performance improvement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 06/16/2013 11:44 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 13/06/2013 12:47, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Friendly reminder for the reviewers.
On 06/10/2013 07:53 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote: This is the follow-up on the issue Doug identified:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2013-June/017798.html
I had reworked the patch, webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8016236/webrev.01/ The current webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8016236/webrev.02/ I'm just catching up on this thread, webrev.02 looks very good to me. I can sponsor it.
Thanks! I'll appreciate this.
One comment on ClassRepositoryHolder is that it's "yet another class" (we have a proliferation of holder classes since we started using this idiom). It makes me wonder if it might be better to move the constant to ClassRepository.
Ok, makes sense. I moved it to ClassRepository itself. Given we have the ClassRepository field in Class, the static initialization will be performed on the first class load. I have no problems having it public, since it is protected enough from the external modifications.
The new webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~shade/8016236/webrev.03/
Testing:
- Linux/x86_64/release build OK
- Linux/x86_64/release passes java/lang/reflect jtreg
- microbenchmark scores are still intact
-Aleksey.
- Previous message: RFR (S) CR 8016236: Class.getGenericInterfaces performance improvement
- Next message: RFR (S) CR 8016236: Class.getGenericInterfaces performance improvement
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]