RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow (original) (raw)

Louis Wasserman lowasser at google.com
Mon Jun 17 18:37:13 UTC 2013

You're right, it'd be WIDTH - 1, but since most of the comments refer to BITS + 1, that evens out nicely.

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Brian Burkhalter < brian.burkhalter at oracle.com> wrote:

Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit?

On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote: > The comments mention SIGNIFICANDBITS, which I think should probably be SIGNIFICANDWIDTH?

-- Louis Wasserman

More information about the core-libs-dev mailing list