RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow (original) (raw)
Brian Burkhalter brian.burkhalter at oracle.com
Mon Jun 17 18:39:12 UTC 2013
- Previous message: RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow
- Next message: RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'll update this but without reposting the webrev until I can upload the HTML version.
On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:37 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote:
You're right, it'd be WIDTH - 1, but since most of the comments refer to BITS + 1, that evens out nicely.
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Brian Burkhalter<brian.burkhalter at oracle.com> wrote: Would it be WIDTH or WIDTH - 1, i.e., with or without the "implied" bit? On Jun 17, 2013, at 11:32 AM, Louis Wasserman wrote: > The comments mention SIGNIFICANDBITS, which I think should probably be SIGNIFICANDWIDTH?
- Previous message: RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow
- Next message: RFR 7131192: BigInteger.doubleValue() is depressingly slow
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]