Review Request (M) 8032379: Remove the is_scavenging flag to process_strong_roots (original) (raw)
Erik Helin erik.helin at oracle.com
Wed Jan 22 14:35:47 UTC 2014
- Previous message (by thread): Review Request (M) 8032379: Remove the is_scavenging flag to process_strong_roots
- Next message (by thread): Review Request (M) 8032379: Remove the is_scavenging flag to process_strong_roots
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Looks good!
Thanks, Erik
On 2014-01-21 14:13, Mikael Gerdin wrote:
Hi all,
as a part of implementing JEP-156 (G1 class unloading) we are doing some cleanups in order to refactor the strong root processing code. Currently there are two "dimensions" in which SharedHeap::processstrongroots is configured. One is the ScanOption enum, the other is the isscavenging booelan. The semantic meaning of isscavenging can easily be folded into the ScanOption enum by: * Introducing a SOAllCodeCache/SOScavengeCodeCache distinction (in a way similar to SOAllClasses/SOSystemClasses) * Noting that passing a CLD closure to Threads::oopsdo is only needed when we want to determine the precise liveness of classes, this is already signaled by SOSystemClasses. Bug link: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8032379 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mgerdin/8032379/webrev.0 Thanks /Mikael
- Previous message (by thread): Review Request (M) 8032379: Remove the is_scavenging flag to process_strong_roots
- Next message (by thread): Review Request (M) 8032379: Remove the is_scavenging flag to process_strong_roots
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]