Fwd: Re: Stream.limit() - puzzler/bug/feature (original) (raw)
Brian Goetz brian.goetz at oracle.com
Fri Nov 16 06:59:24 PST 2012
- Previous message: Fwd: Re: Stream.limit() - puzzler/bug/feature
- Next message: Fwd: Re: Stream.limit() - puzzler/bug/feature
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
BTW, I'm still not sure we should not provide a method iterator() to be able to 'upgrade' to the iterator semantics (for the parallel implementation iterator() will be equivalent to sequential().iterator()).
For that case we also have to provide a spliterator() method.
- Previous message: Fwd: Re: Stream.limit() - puzzler/bug/feature
- Next message: Fwd: Re: Stream.limit() - puzzler/bug/feature
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list