Fwd: Re: Stream.limit() - puzzler/bug/feature (original) (raw)

Remi Forax forax at univ-mlv.fr
Fri Nov 16 08:42:29 PST 2012

On 11/16/2012 03:59 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:

BTW, I'm still not sure we should not provide a method iterator() to be able to 'upgrade' to the iterator semantics (for the parallel implementation iterator() will be equivalent to sequential().iterator()). For that case we also have to provide a spliterator() method.

if we provide a spliterator(), we don't need the method iterator() because one can call spliterator().iterator().

But again, I'm not sure we should provide these methods, I have no idea if it worth the pain to have to implement it for all streams.

Rémi

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list