Function type naming conventions (original) (raw)

Tim Peierls tim at peierls.net
Thu Jan 24 14:47:59 PST 2013

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com> wrote:

+1 ObjIntBlock (or a more descriptive "Block" name if one is selected)

Agreed.

Works well in conjunction with Dan Smith's suggestion ('if the base type is parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To" prefix is mandatory. If not, "To" is not used.'), omitting To and Bi where they aren't needed.

--tim

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list