Function type naming conventions (original) (raw)

Kevin Bourrillion kevinb at google.com
Tue Jan 29 08:48:03 PST 2013

Does anyone have a complete and current taxonomy of where exactly we've ended up with all this (leaving out all the history of how we got here)?

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Tim Peierls <tim at peierls.net> wrote:

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:20 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com>wrote:

+1 ObjIntBlock (or a more descriptive "Block" name if one is selected)

Agreed. Works well in conjunction with Dan Smith's suggestion ('if the base type is parameterized in both its parameters and return, then the "To" prefix is mandatory. If not, "To" is not used.'), omitting To and Bi where they aren't needed. --tim

-- Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com

More information about the lambda-libs-spec-observers mailing list