7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363 (original) (raw)
Jason Uh jason.uh at oracle.com
Wed Sep 12 06:01:47 UTC 2012
- Previous message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Next message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 09/11/2012 09:12 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 09/12/2012 08:48 AM, Jason Uh wrote: Hi all,
Could I please get a review for a backport of Max's test cleanups for jdksecurity{1|2|3}? 7054918 -- jdksecurity1 test target cleanup Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7054918/webrev.7u.00/ JDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a015dda3bdc6 CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7054918 Good.
7055362 -- jdksecurity2 test target cleanup Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7055362/webrev.7u.00/ JDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/febb7f557135 CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7055362 jdksecurity2 should use agenvm mode now.
I'll make this change.
7055363 -- jdksecurity3 test target cleanup Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7055363/webrev.7u.00/ JDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cb83fe13af98 CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7055363 Will take a look. BTW, have you run the new test targets on JPRT?
Yes. For each of the changesets, the corresponding test targets ran successfully. Is that sufficient?
Thanks, Jason
Thanks Max
Thanks, Jason
- Previous message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Next message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]