7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363 (original) (raw)
Weijun Wang weijun.wang at oracle.com
Wed Sep 12 06:05:34 UTC 2012
- Previous message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Next message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 09/12/2012 02:01 PM, Jason Uh wrote:
On 09/11/2012 09:12 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 09/12/2012 08:48 AM, Jason Uh wrote: Hi all, Could I please get a review for a backport of Max's test cleanups for jdksecurity{1|2|3}? 7054918 -- jdksecurity1 test target cleanup Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7054918/webrev.7u.00/ JDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/a015dda3bdc6 CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7054918 Good.
7055362 -- jdksecurity2 test target cleanup Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7055362/webrev.7u.00/ JDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/febb7f557135 CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7055362 jdksecurity2 should use agenvm mode now. I'll make this change. 7055363 -- jdksecurity3 test target cleanup Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7055363/webrev.7u.00/ JDK8 Changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/cb83fe13af98 CR: http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/viewbug.do?bugid=7055363 Will take a look. BTW, have you run the new test targets on JPRT? Yes. For each of the changesets, the corresponding test targets ran successfully. Is that sufficient?
Yes, but you'll have to run again after the agentvm change in jdk_security2.
-Max
Thanks, Jason
Thanks Max
Thanks, Jason
- Previous message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Next message (by thread): 7u10 Request for review: 7054918, 7055362, 7055363
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]