[Python-Dev] Direction of PyChecker (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido@python.org
Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:45:19 -0400
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Direction of PyChecker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Direction of PyChecker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As I said before, I think that the modules/classes in the standard library should have them.
You can help by submitting some patches (one module at a time please :-).
And docstrings are definitely doc, not code.
Agreed, but I don;'t understand why you said this.
> There are also complaints about attribute used by an > abstract base class but only defined in the subclass.
This is true. While python doesn't require setting, I think this feature can be dangerous. It seems better to init the attr to None.
Agreed. The initialization to None can have a comment explaining what the subclass should do.
Ditto for methods: in an abstract base class, the methods should be defined (so the signature is known) but raise NotImplementedError.
In urllib2, there are 6 warnings about 2 different attributes.
How come PyChecker didn't find the other typo there?
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Direction of PyChecker
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Direction of PyChecker
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]