[Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead? (original) (raw)
Christian Heimes lists at cheimes.de
Fri Dec 12 15:50:13 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
Actually, I believe 3.0 already took a big step towards allowing this by changing the way modules are initialised.
You are believing correctly. Martin has designed and implemented a nicely working API to store extension module data per interpreter state. For now interpreter states are used for sub interpreters only.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3121/
Christian
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]