[Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead? (original) (raw)
Thomas Heller theller at ctypes.org
Fri Dec 12 18:32:07 CET 2008
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Christian Heimes schrieb:
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
Actually, I believe 3.0 already took a big step towards allowing this by changing the way modules are initialised. You are believing correctly. Martin has designed and implemented a nicely working API to store extension module data per interpreter state. For now interpreter states are used for sub interpreters only. http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3121/
But the extension modules still have to changed to use this mechanism, right?
Thanks, Thomas
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] The endless GIL debate: why not remove thread support instead?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]