beam divergence (original) (raw)
Author: the photonics expert (RP)
Definition: a measure of how fast a laser beam expands far from its focus
Related: beam radiuslaser beamscollimated beamsbeam parameter productbeam qualitybeam pointing fluctuationsbeam profilersfree-space optical communicationsWhat is a Beam Width, Beam Size, and a Beam Waist?
Units: mrad, °
Formula symbol: ($\theta$)
Page views in 12 months: 22991
DOI: 10.61835/761 Cite the article: BibTex BibLaTex plain textHTML Link to this page! LinkedIn
Content quality and neutrality are maintained according to our editorial policy.
Contents
What is Beam Divergence?
The beam divergence (or more precisely the beam divergence angle) of a laser beam is a measure of how fast the beam expands far from the beam waist, i.e., in the so-called far field. Note that it is not a local property of a beam, for a certain position along its path, but a property of the beam as a whole. (In principle, one could define a local beam divergence e.g. based on the spatial derivative of the beam radius, but that is uncommon.)
Figure 1: The half-angle divergence of a Gaussian laser beam is defined via the asymptotic variation of the beam radius (blue) along the beam direction. Note, however, that the divergence angle in the figure appears much larger than it actually is, since the scaling of the ($x$) and ($y$) axes is different.
A low beam divergence can be important for applications such as pointing or free-space optical communications. Beams with very small divergence, i.e., with approximately constant beam radius over significant propagation distances, are called collimated beams; they can be generated from strongly divergent beams with beam collimators.
Some amount of divergence is unavoidable due to the general nature of waves (assuming that the light propagates in a homogeneous medium, not e.g. in a waveguide). That amount is larger for tightly focused beams. If a beam has a substantially larger beam divergence than physically possible, it is said to have a poor beam quality. More details are given below after defining what divergence means quantitatively.
Quantitative Definitions of Beam Divergence
Different quantitative definitions are used in the literature:
- According to the most common definition, the beam divergence is the derivative of the beam radius with respect to the axial position in the far field, i.e., at a distance from the beam waist which is much larger than the Rayleigh length. This definition yields a divergence half-angle (in units of radians), and further depends on the definition of the beam radius. For Gaussian beams, the beam radius is usually defined via the point with ($1/e^2$) times the maximum intensity. For non-Gaussian profiles, an integral formula can be used, as discussed in the article on beam radius.
- Sometimes, full angles are used instead, resulting in twice as high values.
- Instead of referring to directions with ($1/e^2$) times the maximum intensity, as is done for the Gaussian beam radius, a full width at half-maximum (FWHM) divergence angle can be used. This is common e.g. in data sheets of laser diodes and light-emitting diodes. For Gaussian beams, this kind of full beam divergence angle is 1.18 times the half-angle divergence defined via the Gaussian beam radius (($1/e^2$) radius).
As an example, an FWHM beam divergence angle of 30° may be specified for the fast axis of a small edge-emitting laser diode. This corresponds to a 25.4° = 0.44 rad ($1/e^2$) half-angle divergence, and it becomes apparent that for collimating such a beam without truncating it one would require a lens with a fairly high numerical aperture of e.g. 0.6. Highly divergent (or convergent) beams also require carefully designed optics to avoid beam quality degradation by spherical aberrations.
Divergence of Gaussian Beams and Beams with Poor Beam Quality
For a diffraction-limited Gaussian beam, the ($1/e^2$) beam divergence half-angle is ($\lambda / (\pi w_0)$), where ($\lambda$) is the wavelength (in the medium) and ($w_0$) the beam radius at the beam waist. This equation is based on the paraxial approximation, and is thus valid only for beams with moderately strong divergence. It also shows that the product of beam waist radius ($w_0$) and the divergence angle ($\theta$) (called the beam parameter product) is not changed by any optical system without optical aberrations which transforms a Gaussian beam into another Gaussian beam with different parameters.
A higher beam divergence for a given beam radius, i.e., a higher beam parameter product, is related to an inferior beam quality, which essentially means a lower potential for focusing the beam to a very small spot. If the beam quality is characterized by a certain _M_2 factor, the divergence half-angle is \theta = {M^2}\frac{\lambda }{{\pi {w_0}}}$$
As an example, a 1064-nm beam from a Nd:YAG laser with perfect beam quality (($M^2 = 1$)) and a beam radius of 1 mm in the focus has a half-angle divergence of only 0.34 mrad = 0.019°.
Spatial Fourier Transforms
For obtaining the far field profile of a beam, one may apply a two-dimensional transverse spatial Fourier transform to the complex electric field of a laser beam (→ Fourier optics). Effectively this means that the beam is considered as a superposition of plane waves, and the Fourier transform indicates the amplitudes and phases of all plane-wave components. For propagation in free space, only the phase values change; it is thus easy to calculate propagation over large distances in free space, or alternatively in a homogeneous optical medium.
The width, measured e.g. as the root-mean-squared (r.m.s.) width, of the spatial Fourier transform can be directly related to the beam divergence. This means that the beam divergence (and in fact the full beam propagation) can be calculated from the transverse complex amplitude profile of the beam at any one position along the beam axis, assuming that the beam propagates in an optically homogeneous medium (e.g. in air).
Measurement of Beam Divergence
For the measurement of beam divergence, one usually measures the beam caustic, i.e., the beam radius at different positions, using e.g. a beam profiler.
It is also possible to derive the beam divergence from the complex amplitude profile of the beam in a single plane, as described above. Such data can be obtained e.g. with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor.
One may also simply measure the beam intensity profile at a location far away from the beam waist, where the beam radius is much larger than its value at the beam waist. The beam divergence angle may then be approximated by the measured beam radius divided by the distance from the beam waist.

Frequently Asked Questions
This FAQ section was generated with AI based on the article content and has been reviewed by the article’s author (RP).
What is beam divergence?
Beam divergence is a measure of how quickly a laser beam expands with distance in the far field, i.e., far from its narrowest point (the beam waist). It is typically specified as a half-angle in radians or degrees.
How are beam divergence and beam waist size related?
For a diffraction-limited beam, the divergence angle is inversely proportional to the beam radius at the waist. Consequently, a very tightly focused beam (small waist) will have a large divergence, while a well-collimated beam has a small divergence.
What is a collimated beam?
A collimated beam is a light beam with a very low beam divergence, which means its radius remains nearly constant over a significant propagation distance. Such beams can be generated from a divergent source using a beam collimator.
What does the ($M^2$) factor mean for beam divergence?
The ($M^2$) factor quantifies a beam's quality. A beam with an ($M^2$) factor factor greater than 1 has a divergence angle which is ($M^2$) times larger than that of a diffraction-limited ($M^2 = 1$) beam with the same waist radius.
How can beam divergence be measured?
Beam divergence is typically measured by recording the beam radius at different positions along the propagation path using a beam profiler. Alternatively, it can be calculated from the beam's complex amplitude profile in a single plane, as measured with a Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensor.
Questions and Comments from Users
Here you can submit questions and comments. As far as they get accepted by the author, they will appear above this paragraph together with the author’s answer. The author will decide on acceptance based on certain criteria. Essentially, the issue must be of sufficiently broad interest.
Please do not enter personal data here. (See also our privacy declaration.) If you wish to receive personal feedback or consultancy from the author, please contact him, e.g. via e-mail.
By submitting the information, you give your consent to the potential publication of your inputs on our website according to our rules. (If you later retract your consent, we will delete those inputs.) As your inputs are first reviewed by the author, they may be published with some delay.
general optics