| msg340107 - (view) |
Author: Charles Merriam (CharlesMerriam) |
Date: 2019-04-12 20:09 |
| On page: https://docs.python.org/3.8/library/itertools.html In the heading summary, in the "Iterators terminating on the shortest input sequence:" section, in the "zip_longest()" table row, in the "Arguments" column, the text "p, q, ..." should be "p, q, ... [, fillvalue=None]" |
|
|
| msg340113 - (view) |
Author: Cheryl Sabella (cheryl.sabella) *  |
Date: 2019-04-12 21:27 |
| Good catch! In the same section, accumulate() is missing the `initial` argument. Would you be interested in submitting a pull request for this? |
|
|
| msg340132 - (view) |
Author: Charles Merriam (Charles.Merriam) |
Date: 2019-04-12 23:11 |
| Hi Cheryl, No. I've dealt with the Team Python long cycles for random pull requests before. Charles On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 2:27 PM Cheryl Sabella <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Cheryl Sabella <cheryl.sabella@gmail.com> added the comment: > > Good catch! In the same section, accumulate() is missing the `initial` > argument. > > Would you be interested in submitting a pull request for this? > > ---------- > nosy: +cheryl.sabella > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue36620> > _______________________________________ > |
|
|
| msg340134 - (view) |
Author: Cheryl Sabella (cheryl.sabella) * |
Date: 2019-04-12 23:59 |
| Thanks, Charles. I'm going to assign this to @Mariatta for the sprints. |
|
|
| msg341928 - (view) |
Author: Ying Wang (yingw787) * |
Date: 2019-05-08 18:54 |
| I would like to take a stab at this as a first-time CPython contributor. |
|
|
| msg341957 - (view) |
Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2019-05-09 03:40 |
| Sorry, I don't want to do this in the summary table. The goal of the table is to provide a minimal overview to help select the appropriate itertool and to provide a fast link to the details given below. |
|
|
| msg341959 - (view) |
Author: Ying Wang (yingw787) * |
Date: 2019-05-09 03:46 |
| @rhettinger should this issue be closed if no action is to be taken? If so, should I manually close the pull request referencing this issue, or will that be automatically handled by the Python bug tracker? |
|
|
| msg342142 - (view) |
Author: Raymond Hettinger (rhettinger) * |
Date: 2019-05-10 23:31 |
| I'll take care of it. Thank you. |
|
|