Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): Limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history (original) (raw)
Aldasoro J. J., Aedo C. and Navarro C. (2005). Phylogenetic and phytogeographical relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae) based on morphological and anatomical characters. Blumea 50: 3–15 Google Scholar
Campbell C. S., Baldwin B. G., Donoghue M. J. and Wojciechowski M. F. (1995). A phylogeny of the genera of Maloideae (Rosaceae): Evidence from Internal Transcribed Spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences and congruence with morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 903–918 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Challice J. (1973). Phenolic compounds of the subfamily Pomoideae: A chemotaxonomic survey. Phytochemistry 12: 1095–1101 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Challice J. S. (1974). Rosaceae chemotaxonomy and the origins of the Pomoideae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 69: 239–259 Google Scholar
Challice J. and Kovanda M. (1978). Flavonoids as markers of taxonomic relationships in the genus Sorbus in Europe. Preslia 50: 305–320 Google Scholar
Chevreau E., Lespinasse Y. and Gallet M. (1985). Inheritance of pollen enzymes and polyploid origin of apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 268–277 CAS Google Scholar
Donoghue M. J. and Sanderson M. J. (1992). The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. In: Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S. and Doyle, J. J. (eds) Molecular systematics of plants, pp 340–368. Chapman and Hall, New York Google Scholar
Doyle J. J. and Doyle J. L. (1987). A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15 Google Scholar
Evans R. C. (1999) Molecular, morphological, and ontogenetic evaluation of relationships and evolution in Rosaceae. Ph.D. thesis, Botany Department, University of Toronto.
Evans R. C., Alice L. A., Campbell C. S., Kellogg E. A. and Dickinson T. A. (2000). The granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene in Rosaceae: multiple putative loci and phylogenetic utility. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. 17: 388–400 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Evans R. C. and Campbell C. S. (2002). The origin of the apple subfamily (Rosaceae: Maloideae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI Genes. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1478–1484 CAS Google Scholar
Evans R. C. and Dickinson T. A. (1999). Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 160: 981–1012 Article Google Scholar
Evans R. C. and Dickinson T. A. (2005). Floral ontogeny and morphology in Gillenia (``Spiraeoideae'') and subfamily Maloideae C. Weber (Rosaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 166: 427–447 Article Google Scholar
Farr D. F. (1989). Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States. APS Press, St. Paul, Minn Google Scholar
Farr D. F., Rossman A. Y., Palm M. E., McCray E. B. (2005) Fungal databases, Systematic Botany & Mycology Laboratory. Agricultural Research Service, United States Dept. of Agriculture.
Felsenstein J. (1978). Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401–410 Article Google Scholar
Felsenstein J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791 Article Google Scholar
Fiala K. I. and Sokal R. R. (1985). Factors determining the accuracy of cladogram estimation: evaluation using computer simulation. Evolution 39: 609–622 Article Google Scholar
Fishbein M., Hibsch-Jetter C., Soltis D. E. and Hufford L. (2001). Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Syst. Biol. 50: 817–847 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Fishbein M. and Soltis D. E. (2004). Further resolution of the rapid radiation in Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots) supported by mixed-model Bayesian analysis. Syst. Bot. 29: 883–891 Article Google Scholar
Godron D. A. (1874). De l'hybridité dans le genre Sorbier. Rev. Sci. Nat. 4: 443–447 Google Scholar
Graham S. (1997) Phylogenetic analyses of breeding-system evolution in heterostylous monocotyledons. Ph.D. thesis, Botany Department, University of Toronto.
Hasegawa M., Kishino H. and Yano T. (1985). Dating of the human-ape split by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J. Molec. Evol. 21: 160–174 Article Google Scholar
Huelsenbeck J. P. (1995). Performance of phylogenetic methods in simulation. Syst. Biol. 44: 17–48 Article Google Scholar
Hutchinson J. (1964). The genera of flowering plants, vol. 1, Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford Google Scholar
Ishikawa S., Kato S., Imakawa S., Mikami T. and Shimamoto Y. (1992). Organelle DNA polymorphisms in cultivated apple and rootstocks. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 963–967 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Jones G. N. (1946). American species of Amelanchier. Urbana, Illinois Google Scholar
Kalkman C. (1973). The Malesian species of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Blumea 21: 413–442 Google Scholar
Kalkman C. (2004). Rosaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) The families and genera of vascular plants, pp 343–386. Springer, Berlin Google Scholar
Kovanda M. (1965). On the generic limits in the Maloideae. Preslia 37: 27–34 Google Scholar
Liljefors A. (1934). Űber normale und apospore Embryosackentwicklung in der Gattung Sorbus, nebst einigen Bemerkungen űber die Chromosomenzahlen. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 28: 290–299 Google Scholar
Liljefors A. (1953). Studies on propagation, embryology and pollination in Sorbus. Acta Horti Berg. 16: 277–329 Google Scholar
Linder C. R. and Rieseberg L. H. (2004). Reconstructing patterns of reticulate evolution in plants. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 1700–1708 Google Scholar
Lo E., Stefanovic S., Dickinson T. A., in press. Crataegus and Mespilus (Pyreae, Rosaceae) – two genera or one? Syst. Bot.
McDade L. A. (1995). Hybridization and phylogenetics. In: Hoch, P. C. and Stephenson, A. G. (eds) Experimental and molecular approaches to plant biosystematics, pp 305–331. Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis Google Scholar
Morgan D. R., Soltis D. E. and Robertson K. R. (1994). Systematic and evolutionary implications of _rbc_L sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890–903 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Nelson-Jones E. B., Briggs D. and Smith A. G. (2002). The origin of intermediate species of the genus Sorbus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 953–963 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Oddou-Muratorio S., Petit R. J., Guerroue B. L., Guesnet D. and Demesure B. (2001). Pollen- versus seed-mediated gene flow in a scattered forest tree species. Evolution 55: 1123–1135 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Petit R. J., Pineau E., Demesure B., Bacillieri R., Ducousso A., Kremer A. (1997) Chloroplast DNA footprints of postglacial recolonization by oaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94.
Phipps J. B., Robertson K. R., Rohrer J. R. and Smith P. G. (1991). Origins and evolution of subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 303–332 Article Google Scholar
Posada D. and Crandall K. A. (1998). Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Potter D., Eriksson T., Evans R. C., Oh S.-H., Smedmark J., Morgan D., Kerr M., Robertson K. R., Arsenault M., Dickinson T. A., Campbell C. S., In press. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 5–43.
Rambaut A. (2002). Se-Al: sequence alignment editor. University of Oxford, Oxford, England Google Scholar
Raspé O. A., Jacquemart L. and De Sloover J. (1998). Isozymes in Sorbus aucuparia (Rosaceae: Maloideae): genetic analysis and evolutionary significance of zymograms. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 159: 627–636 Article Google Scholar
Raspé O. and Kohn J. R. (2002). S-allele diversity in Sorbus aucuparia and Crataegus monogyna (Rosaceae: Maloideae). Heredity 88: 458–465 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Rieseberg L. H. and Soltis D. E. (1991). Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Pl. 5: 65–84 Google Scholar
Robertson K. R., Phipps J. B., Rohrer J. R. and Smith P. G. (1991). A synopsis of genera of the Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 376–394 Article Google Scholar
Roemer M. J. (1847) Familiarum naturalium regni vegetabilis synopses monographicae. III. Rosi-florae. Amygdalacearum et Pomacearum. Weimar, Landes-Industrie-Comptoir.
Rohrer J. R., Robertson K. R. and Phipps J. B. (1991). Variation in structure among fruits of Maloideae (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1617–1635 Article Google Scholar
Rohrer J. R., Robertson K. R. and Phipps J. B. (1994). Floral morphology of Maloideae (Rosaceae) and its systematic relevance. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 574–581 Article Google Scholar
Rokas A., Kruger D. and Carroll S. B. (2005). Animal evolution and molecular signature of radiation compressed in time. Science 310: 1933–1938 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ronquist F. and Huelsenbeck J. P. (2003). MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574 ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Sang T. (2002). Utility of low-copy nuclear gene sequences in plant phylogenetics. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Molec. Biol. 37: 121–147 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Savile D. B. O. (1979). Fungi as aids in higher plant classification. Bot. Rev. 45: 380–495 Article Google Scholar
Sax K. (1931). The origin and relationships of the Pomoideae. J. Arnold Arbor. 12: 3–22 Google Scholar
Sax K. (1932). Chromosome relationships in the Pomoideae. J. Arnold Arbor. 13: 363–367 Google Scholar
Sax K. (1933). The origin of the Pomoideae. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 30: 147–150 Google Scholar
Simmmons M. P. and Ochoterena H. (2000). Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Syst. Biol. 49: 369–381 Article Google Scholar
Spjut R. W. (1994). A systematic treatment of fruit types. Bronx, New York Google Scholar
Sterling C. (1964). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. III. Pomoideae: Crataegus, Hesperomeles, Mespilus, Osteomeles. Amer. J. Bot. 51: 705–712 Article Google Scholar
Sterling C. (1965a). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. IV. Pomoideae: Chamaemeles, Cotoneaster, Dichotomanthes, Pyracantha. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 47–54 Article Google Scholar
Sterling C. (1965b). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. V. Pomoideae: Amelanchier, Aronia, Malacomeles, Malus, Peraphyllum, Pyrus, Sorbus. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 418–426 Article Google Scholar
Sterling C. (1965c). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. VI. Pomoideae: Eriobotrya, Heteromeles, Photinia, Pourthiaea, Raphiolepis, Stranvaesia. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 938–946 Article Google Scholar
Sterling C. (1966). Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. VII. Pomoideae: Chaenomeles, Cydonia, Docynia. Amer. J. Bot. 53: 225–231 Article Google Scholar
Swofford D. L. (2001). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Sinauer Associates, Inc, Sunderland, MA Google Scholar
Talent N. and Dickinson T. A. (2005). Polyploidy in Crataegus and Mespilus (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Canad. J. Bot. 83: 1268–1304 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Vidal J. E. (1965). Notes sur quelques Rosacées Asiatique (II) (Photinia, Stranvaesia). Adansonia 5: 221–237 Google Scholar
Weeden N. and Lamb R. (1987). Genetics and linkage analysis of 19 isozyne loci in apple. J. Amer. Hort. Soc. 112: 865–872 CAS Google Scholar
Wilson M. A., Grant B. and Clegg M. T. (1990). Chloroplast DNA evolves slowly in the palm family (Arecaceae). Molec. Biol. Evol. 7: 303–314 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Wolfe J. A. and Wehr W. (1988). Rosaceous _Chamaebatiaria_-like foliage from the Paleogene of western North America. Aliso 12: 177–200 Google Scholar
Yang Z. (1994a). Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J. Molec. Evol. 39: 294–307 Google Scholar
Yang Z. (1994b). Estimating the pattern of nucleotide substitution. Molec. Evol. 39: 105–111 Google Scholar
Zhang L. Q., Pond S. K. and Gaut B. S. (2001). A survey of the molecular evolutionary dynamics of twenty-five multigene families from four grass taxa. J. Molec. Evol. 52: 144–156 PubMedCAS Google Scholar
Zhang S.-Y. (1992). Wood anatomy of the Rosaceae. Rijksherbarium/Hortus Botanicus, Leiden Google Scholar