Balleine, B. W., & Dickinson, A. (1998). Goal-directed instrumental action: Contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates. Neuropharmacology, 37(4–5), 407–419. Article Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–600. Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1435), 1177–1187. Article Google Scholar
Barsalou, L., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A., & Wilson, C. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(2), 84–91. Article Google Scholar
Beer, R. (1995). A dynamical systems perspective on agent-environment interaction. Artificial Intelligence, 72, 173–215. Article Google Scholar
Beer, R. (1997). The dynamics of adaptive behavior: A research program. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20, 257–289. Article Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (1998). Levels of representationality. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), 179–215. Article Google Scholar
Bickhard, M. H. (2001). Function, anticipation and representation. In D. M. Dubois, (Ed.), Computing Anticipatory Systems. CASYS 2000 – Fourth International Conference (pp. 459–469). Melville, NY. American Institute of Physics.
Bickhard, M. H., & Terveen, L. (1995). Foundational issues in artificial intelligence and cognitive science: Impasse and solution. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific. Google Scholar
Blakemore, S.-J., & Decety, J. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 561–567. Google Scholar
Bongard, J., Zykov, V., & Lipson, H. (2006a). Resilient machines through continuous self-modeling. Science, 314(5802), 1118–1121. Article Google Scholar
Bongard, J. C., Zykov, V., & Lipson, H. (2006b). Automated synthesis of body schema using multiple sensor modalities. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems (ALIFEX) (pp. 220–226).
Breazeal, C., & Scassellati, B. (1999). A context-dependent attention system for a social robot. In IJCAI ’99: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 1146–1153). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
Brentano, F. (1985). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (trans: Rancurello, A. C., Terrell, D. B., & McAlister, L. L.). London: Routledge.
Brooks, R. A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47(47), 139–159. Article Google Scholar
Butz, M. V. (2002). Anticipatory learning classifier systems. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. MATH Google Scholar
Butz, M. V., Sigaud, O., & Gérard, P. (2003). Internal models and anticipations in adaptive learning systems. In M. V. Butz, O. Sigaud, & P. Gérard (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: Foundations, theories, and systems (pp. 86–109). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar
Camazine, S., Franks, N. R., Sneyd, J., Bonabeau, E., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Theraula, G. (2001). Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
Cangelosi, A. (2006). The grounding and sharing of symbols. Pragmatics and Cognition, 14, 275–285. Article Google Scholar
Carlsson, K., Petrovic, P., Skare, S., Petersson, K. M., & Ingvar, M. (2000). Tickling expectations: Neural processing in anticipation of a sensory stimulus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 691–703. Article Google Scholar
Carpenter, G. A., & Grossberg, S. (1988). The art of adaptive pattern recognition by a self-organizing neural network. Computer, 21(3), 77–88. Article Google Scholar
Castelfranchi, C. (2005). Mind as an anticipatory device: For a theory of expectations. In BVAI 2005, pp. 258–276.
Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford University Press, New York. Tr. It., La mente cosciente, McGraw- Hill, 1999.
Chiel, H. J., & Beer, R. D. (1997). The brain has a body: Adaptive behavior emerges from interactions of nervous system, body and environment. Trends in Neurosciences, 20, 553–557. Article Google Scholar
Churchland, P. (1992). A neurocomputational perspective: The nature of mind and the structure of science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Cisek, P., & Kalaska, J. (2001). Common codes for situated interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 883–884. Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1998). Being there. Putting brain, body, and world together. MIT Press.
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 10–23. Article Google Scholar
Clark, A., & Grush, R. (1999). Towards a cognitive robotics. Adaptive Behavior, 7(1), 5–16. Article Google Scholar
Colombo, M., & Graziano, M. (1994). Effects of auditory and visual interference on auditory-visual delayed matching to sample in monkeys (maca fascicularis). Behavioral Neuroscience, 108, 636–639. Article Google Scholar
Conte, R., & Castelfranchi, C. (1995). Cognitive and social action. London, UK: University College London. Google Scholar
Cotterill, R. (1998). Enchanted looms: Conscious networks in brains and computers. Cambridge University Press.
Cotterill, R. (2001). Cooperation of the basal ganglia, cerebellum, sensory cerebrum and hippocampus: Possible implications for cognition, consciousness, intelligence and creativity. Progress in Neurobiology, 64, 1–33. Article Google Scholar
Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam. Google Scholar
Dautenhahn, K., & Nehaniv, C. (2002). Imitation in animals and artifacts. MIT Press.
Decety, J. (1996). Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate? Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 87–93. Article Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Chaminade, T. (2003). When the self represents the other: A new cognitive neuroscience view on psychological identification. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(20), 577–596. Article Google Scholar
Decety, J., Grèzes, J., Costes, N., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Procyk, E., Grassi, F., & Fazio, F. (1997). Brain activity during observation of actions. influence of action content and subject’s strategy. Brain, 120(Pt 10), 1763–1777. Article Google Scholar
Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., & Prablanc, C. (1989). The timing of mentally represented actions. Behavioural Brain Research, 34(1–2), 35–42. Article Google Scholar
Delcomyn, F. (1980). Neural basis for rhythmic behaviour in animals. Science, 210, 492–498. Article Google Scholar
Demiris, Y. (2007). Prediction of intent in robotics and multi-agent systems. Cognitive Processing, 8(3), 151–158. Article Google Scholar
Demiris, J., & Hayes, G. (1996). Imitative learning mechanisms in robots and humans. In Proceedingsof the 5th European Workshop on Learning Robot, pp. 9–16.
Demiris, Y., & Khadhouri, B. (2005). Hierarchical attentive multiple models for execution and recognition (hammer). Robotics and Autonomous Systems Journal, 54, 361–369. Article Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. Little, Brown & Co.
Desmurget, M., & Grafton, S. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423–431. Article Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review, 3, 357–370. Article Google Scholar
Doya, K. (1996). Temporal difference learning in continuous time and space. In D. S. Touretzky, M. C. Mozer, & M. E. Hasselmo (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 8, pp. 1073–1079). The MIT Press.
Drescher, G. L. (1991). Made-up minds: A constructivist approach to artificial intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. MATH Google Scholar
Dunker, K. (1935). Psychology des produktiven Denkens. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The Theory of Neuronal Group Selection. New York: Basic Books Google Scholar
Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14(2), 179–211. Article Google Scholar
Fleischer, J. G. (2007). Neural correlates of anticipation in cerebellum, basal ganglia, and hippocampus. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Pezzulo, & G. Baldassarre (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: Advances in anticipatory processing, LNAI 4520. Springer.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1980). Methodological solipsism considered as a research strategy in cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 63–109. Google Scholar
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P., Chersi, F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308, 662–667. Article Google Scholar
Friston, K. (2003). Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Networks, 16(9), 1325–1352. Article Google Scholar
Frith, C. (2007). Making up the mind. How the brain creates our mental world. Blackwell.
Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2006). How we predict what other people are going to do. Brain Research, 1079(1), 36–46. Article Google Scholar
Gallagher, S., & Jeannerod, M. (2002). From action to interaction. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(24), 3–26. Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2000). The inner sense of action: Agency and motor representations. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 7, 23–40. Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2001). The ’shared manifold’ hypothesis. from mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 5–87. Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493–501. Article Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22, 455–479. Article Google Scholar
Gallese, V., & Metzinger, T. (2003). Motor ontology: The representational reality of goals, actions, and selves. Philosophical Psychology, 13(3), 365–388. Article Google Scholar
Gardenfors, P. (2004). Cooperation and the evolution of symbolic communication. In K. Oller & U. Griebel (Eds.), Evolution of communication systems: A comparative approach (pp. 237–256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Gardenfors, P., & Orvath, M. (2005). The evolution of anticipatory cognition as a precursor to symbolic communication. In S. Brook (Ed.), Proceedings of the Morris Symposium on the Evolution of Language, NY, USA.
Gattis, M. (2001). Spatial schemas in abstract thought. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Gers, F. A., Schraudolph, N. N., & Schmidhuber, J. (2003). Learning precise timing with lstm recurrent networks. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 115–143. ArticleMathSciNetMATH Google Scholar
Ghez, C., & Thach, W. T. (2000). Principles of neural science, chapter The cerebellum (4th ed., pp. 833–835). New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55. Google Scholar
Goldman, A. (2005). Imitation, mind reading, and simulation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation II (pp. 80–81). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Gorniak, P., & Roy, D. (2007). Situated language understanding as filtering perceived affordances. Cognitive Science, 31(2), 197–231. Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77, 73–99. Article Google Scholar
Gross, H.-M., Volker, S., & Torsten, S. (1999). A neural architecture for sensorimotor anticipation. Neural Networks, 12, 1101–1129. Article Google Scholar
Grush, R. (1997). The architecture of representation. Philosophical Psychology, 10(1), 5–25. Article Google Scholar
Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377–396. Google Scholar
Gurney, K., Prescott, T., & Redgrave, P. (2001). A computational model of action selection in the basal ganglia, i. a new functional anatomy. Biological Cybernetics, 84, 401–410. ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Haken, H. (1988). Information and self-organization, a macroscopic approach to complex systems. Berlin/New York: Springer-Verlag. MATH Google Scholar
Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42, 335–346. Article Google Scholar
Haruno, M., Wolpert, D., & Kawato, M. (2003). Hierarchical mosaic for movement generation. In T. Ono, G. Matsumoto, R. Llinas, A. Berthoz, H. Norgren, & R. Tamura (Eds.) Excepta medica international coungress series. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1977). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar
Hesslow, G. (2002). Conscious thought as simulation of behaviour and perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 242–247. Article Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H. (2007). Perception through visuomotor anticipation in a mobile robot. Neural Networks, 20, 22–33. ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Hoffmann, H., & Moller, R. (2004). Action selection and mental transformation based on a chain of forward models. In S. Schaal, A. Ijspeert, A. Billard, S. Vijayakumar, J. Hallam, & J.-A. Meyer (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 8, Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (pp. 213–222). Los Angeles, CA: MIT Press.
Hoffmann, J. (1993). Vorhersage und Erkenntnis: Die Funktion von Antizipationen in der menschlichen Verhaltenssteuerung und Wahrnehmung [Anticipation and cognition: The function of anticipations in human behavioral control and perception]. Goettingen, Germany: Hogrefe. Google Scholar
Hoffmann, J., Stöcker, C., & Kunde, W. (2004). Anticipatory control of actions. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 346–361. Google Scholar
Hommel, B. (2003). Planning and representing intentional action. The Scientific World Journal, 3, 593–608. Google Scholar
Hommel, B., Musseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (tec): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Science, 24(5), 849–878. Article Google Scholar
Houk, J. C., & Wise, S. P. (1995). Distributed modular architectures linking basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cerebral cortex: Their role in planning and controlling action. Cerebral Cortex, 5(2), 95–110. Article Google Scholar
Hurley, S. L. (2005). Active perception and perceiving action: The shared circuits hypothesis. In T. Gendler & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Perceptual experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Hurley, S., & Chater, N. (2004). Perspectives on imitation: From cognitive neuroscience to social science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1982). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy. Nijhoff: The Hague. Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2002). Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cereb Cortex, 12, 847–855. Article Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2003). Understanding others: Imitation, language, empathy. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From cognitive neuroscience to social science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Jacobs, R., Jordan, M., Nowlan, S., & Hinton, G. (1991). Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation, 3, 79–87. Article Google Scholar
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications. Google Scholar
James, M., Singh, S., & Littman, M. (2004). Planning with predictive state representations. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (pp. 304–311).
Jeannerod, M. (1979). Visuomotor experiments: Failure to replicate, or failure to match the theory? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 71. Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245. Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (1997). The cognitive neuroscience of action. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, S103–S109. Article Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M., & Decety, J. (1995). Mental motor imagery: A window into the representational stages of action. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5(6), 727–732. Article Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M., & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, simulation, and self-identification. Mind and Language, 19(2), 113–146. Article Google Scholar
Johnson, M., & Demiris, Y. (2005a). Hierarchies of coupled inverse and forward models for abstraction in robot action planning, recognition and imitation. In Proceedings of the AISB 2005 Symposium on Imitation in Animals and Artifacts (pp. 69–76). Hertfordshire, UK.
Johnson, M., & Demiris, Y. (2005b). Perceptual perspective taking and action recognition. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 2(4), 301–309. Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16, 307–354. Article Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781/1998). Critique of pure reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, F., & Hafner, V. (2006). The challenges of joint attention. Interaction Studies, 7(2).
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Kawato, M. (1990). Computational schemes and neural network models for formulation and control of multijoint arm trajectories. In W. T. Miller, R. S. Sutton, & P. J. Werbos (Eds.), Neural Networks for Control (pp. 197–228). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 9, 718–727. Article Google Scholar
Keijzer, F. (2001). Representation and behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. (1991). Anticipatory dynamical systems, intrinsic pattern dynamics and skill learning. Human Movement Science, 10(1), 93–111. Article Google Scholar
Kelso, J. A. S. (1995). Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). Higher-order motor disorders, chapter Linking perception and action: An ideomotor approach (pp. 79–104). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Kondo, T., & Ito, K. (2006). A design principle of adaptive neural controllers for realizing anticipatory behavior in reaching movement under unexperienced environments. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Pezzulo, & G. Baldassarre, (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems (ABiALS 2006).
Kording, K., & Wolpert, D. (2006). Bayesian decision theory in sensorimotor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 319–326. Article Google Scholar
Kosslyn, S. M., & Sussman, A. (1994). Roles of imagery in perception: Or, there is no such thing as immaculate perception. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1035–1042). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Kuipers, B., Beeson, P., Modayil, J., & Provost, J. (2006). Bootstrap learning of foundational representations. Connection Science (accepted for publication), 18(2).
Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(1), 87–106. Article Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
Landauer, T. K. (1962). Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 646. Google Scholar
Littman, M., Sutton, R., & Singh, S. (2001). Predictive representations of state. In Proceedings of NIPS-02, Vancouver.
Lu, X., & Ashe, J. (2005). Anticipatory activity in primary motor cortex codes memorized movement sequences. Neuron, 45(6), 967–973. Article Google Scholar
Lungarella, M., Metta, G., Pfeifer, R., & Sandini, G. (2004). Developmental robotics: A survey. Connection Science, 0(0), 1–40. Google Scholar
Maravita, A., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2003). Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology, 13(13), R531–R539. Article Google Scholar
Markman, A. B., & Dietrich, E. (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 470–475. Article Google Scholar
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Pub. Google Scholar
Mehta, B., & Schaal, S. (2002). Forward models in visuomotor control. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 942–953. Google Scholar
Mel, B. (1990). Vision-based robot motion planning. In W. T. Miller III, R. S. Sutton, & P. Werbos (Eds.), Neural Networks for Control. Bradford: MIT.
Meltzoff, A., & Prinz, W. (2002). The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard. Google Scholar
Miall, R. C., & Wolpert, D. M. (1996). Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks, 9(8), 1265–1279. ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Middleton, F. A., & Strick, P. L. (2000). Basal ganglia output and cognition: Evidence from anatomical, behavioral, and clinical studies. Brain and Cognition, 42(2), 183–200. Article Google Scholar
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar
Mohan, V., & Morasso, P. (2006). A forward/inverse motor controller for cognitive robotics. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artifical Neural Networks (pp. 602–611).
Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. Google Scholar
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Nolfi, S. (2002). Power and limits of reactive agents. Neurocomputing, 49, 119–145. Article Google Scholar
Nolfi, S. (2005). Behaviour as a complex adaptive system: On the role of self-organization in the development of individual and collective behaviour. ComplexUs, 2, 195–203. Article Google Scholar
O’Regan, J., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(5), 883–917. Google Scholar
Oudeyer, P.-Y., Kaplan, F., Hafner, V. V., & Whyte, A. (2005). The playground experiment: Task-independent development of a curious robot. In D. Bank & L. Meeden (Eds.), Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Developmental Robotics, 2005 (pp. 42–47). Stanford, California.
Pacherie, E., & Dokic, J. (2006). From mirror neurons to joint actions. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2–3), 101–112. Article Google Scholar
Paine, R. W., & Tani, J. (2005). How hierarchical control self-organizes in artificial adaptive systems. Adaptive Behavior, 13(3), 211–225. Article Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1897/1940). Philosophical writings of Peirce, chapter Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs. Dover.
Pezzulo, G. (2006). How can a massively modular mind be context-sensitive? A computational approach. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling 2006.
Pezzulo, G., Baldassarre, G., Butz, M. V., Castelfranchi, C., & Hoffmann, J. (2007). From actions to goals and vice-versa: Theoretical analysis and models of the ideomotor principle and tote. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Pezzulo, & G. Baldassarre (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: Advances in anticipatory processing, LNAI 4520. Springer.
Pezzulo, G., & Calvi, G. (2006a). A schema based model of the praying mantis. In S. Nolfi, G. Baldassarre, R. Calabretta, J. Hallam, D. Marocco, O. Miglino, J.-A. Meyer, & D. Parisi (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 9: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour, volume LNAI 4095 (pp. 211–223). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
Pezzulo, G., & Calvi, G. (2006b). Toward a perceptual symbol system. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems. Lund University Cognitive Science Studies 118.
Pezzulo, G., & Calvi, G. (2007). Schema-based design and the akira schema language: An overview. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Pezzulo, & G. Baldassarre (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: Advances in anticipatory processing, LNAI 4520. Springer.
Pezzulo, G., Calvi, G., Ognibene, D., & Lalia, D. (2005). Fuzzy-based schema mechanisms in akira. In CIMCA ’05: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Modelling, Control and Automation and International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce (Vol. 2, pp. 146–152). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing, 8(2), 115–131. Article Google Scholar
Pfeifer, R., & Scheier, C. (1999). Understanding intelligence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Ballentine.
Piaget, J. (1985). Equilibration of cognitive structures. University of Chicago Press.
Pierce, D. M., & Kuipers, B. J. (1997). Map learning with uninterpreted sensors and effectors. Artificial Intelligence, 92, 169–227. ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1996). Alles Leben ist Problemlösen. Über Erkenntnis, Geschichte und Politik. München: R. Piper-Verlag. Google Scholar
Port, R., & van Gelder, T. (1995). Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Prinz, W. (1990). A common coding approach to perception and action. In O. Neumann & W. Prinz (Eds.), Relationships between perception and action (pp. 167–201). Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar
Prinz, W. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 141–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
Rainer, G., Rao, S. C., & Miller, E. K. (1999). Prospective coding for objects in primate prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5493–5505. Google Scholar
Rao, R. P., & Ballard, D. H. (1999). Predictive coding in the visual cortex: A functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects. Nature Neuroscience, 2(1), 79–87. Article Google Scholar
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2(11), 1019–1025. Article Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(5), 188–194. Article Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. Article Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670. Article Google Scholar
Roitblat, H. (1980). Codes and coding processes in pigeon short-term memory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 8, 341–351. Google Scholar
Rosen, R. (1985). Anticipatory systems. Pergamon Press.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10(1), 18–24. Article Google Scholar
Roy, D. (2005). Semiotic schemas: A framework for grounding language in action and perception. Artificial Intelligence, 167(1–2), 170–205. Article Google Scholar
Roy, D., yuh Hsiao, K., Mavridis, N., & Gorniak, P. (2006). Ripley, hand me the cup: Sensorimotor representations for grounding word meaning. In International Conference of Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding.
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2001). Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A pet investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience, 4(5), 546–550. Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble. Google Scholar
Scassellati, B. (1999). Imitation and mechanisms of joint attention: A developmental structure for building social skills on a humanoid robot. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1562, 176–195. Article Google Scholar
Schenck, W., & Moller, R. (2006). Learning a visual forward model for a robot camera head. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud, G. Pezzulo, & G. Baldassarre (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Anticipatory Behavior in Adaptive Learning Systems (ABiALS 2006).
Schmidhuber, J. (1991). Adaptive confidence and adaptive curiosity. Technical Report FKI-149-91, Institut für Informatik, Technische Universitat.
Schmidhuber, J. (2002). Exploring the predictable. In S. Ghosh & S. Tsutsui (Eds.), Advances in evolutionary computing (pp. 579–612). Springer.
Schomaker, L. (2004). Anticipation in cybernetic systems: A case against mindless anti-representationalism. In IEEE lntemational Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 2037–2045.
Schöner, G. (2002). Dynamical systems approaches to neural systems and behavior. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 10571–10575). Pergamon: Oxford. Google Scholar
Schöner, G., & Kelso, J. A. S. (1988). Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science, 239, 1513–1520. Article Google Scholar
Schubotz, R. I. (2007). Prediction of external events with our motor system: Towards a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 211–218. Article Google Scholar
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599. Article Google Scholar
Shanahan, M. (2005). Cognition, action selection, and inner rehearsal. In Proceedings IJCAI 2005 Workshop on Modelling Natural Action Selection, pp. 92–99.
Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1(7), 261–267. Article Google Scholar
Sloman, A. (2006). Orthogonal recombinable competences acquired by altricial species. Technical report, University of Birmingham.
Steels, L. (2003). Intelligence with representation. Philosophical Transactions: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361(1811), 2381–2395. ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
Stephan, V., & Gross, H.-M. (2003). Visuomotor anticipation – a powerful approach to behavior-driven perception. Künstliche Intelligenz, 17(2), 12–17. Google Scholar
Stern, D. (2004). The present moment. New York, London: W.W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar
Sutton, R. S. (1988). Learning to predict by the methods of temporal differences. Machine Learning, 3, 9–44. Google Scholar
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88(2), 135–170. Article Google Scholar
Tani, J. (2003). Learning to generate articulated behavior through the bottom-up and the top-down interaction processes. Neural Networks, 16(1), 11–23. Article Google Scholar
Tani, J., Ito, M., & Sugita, Y. (2004). Self-organization of distributedly represented multiple behavior schemata in a mirror system: Reviews of robot experiments using rnnpb. Neural Networks, 17(8–9), 1273–1289. Article Google Scholar
Tani, J., & Nolfi, S. (1999). Learning to perceive the world as articulated: An approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor systems. Neural Networks, 12(7–8), 1131–1141. Article Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1971). What is involved in a genetic psychology? In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 393–416). New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of perception and action. MIT Press.
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Tolman, E. (1932). Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A., & Ratner, H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552. Article Google Scholar
Toussaint, M. (2006). A sensorimotor map: Modulating lateral interactions for anticipation and planning. Neural Computation, 18(5), 1132–1155. ArticleMATH Google Scholar
Tsoukalas, L. H. (1998). Neurofuzzy approaches to anticipation: A new paradigm for intelligent systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, 28(4), 573–582. Article Google Scholar
van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 92(7), 345–381. Article Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. T., & Rosch, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. The MIT Press.
Vaughan, R. T., & Zuluaga, M. (2006). Use your illusion: Sensorimotor self-simulation allows complex agents to plan with incomplete self-knowledge. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour (SAB), Rome, Italy.
Vijayakumar, S., D’souza, A., & Schaal, S. (2005). Incremental online learning in high dimensions. Neural Computation, 17(12), 2602–2634. ArticleMathSciNet Google Scholar
von Holst, E., & Mittelstaedt, H. (1950). Das reafferenzprinzip. Naturwissenschaften, 37, 464–476. Article Google Scholar
von Uexküll, J. (1985). Environment [umwelt] and inner world of animals. In G. M. Burghardt (Ed.), Foundations of comparative ethology (pp. 222–245). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Weng, J., & Zhang, Y. (2002). Developmental robots: A new paradigm. In Proceedings Second International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics.
Wickens, J. (1997). Basal ganglia: Structure and computations. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 8, R77–R109. Article Google Scholar
Witkowski, M. (2003). Towards a four factor theory of anticipatory learning. In M. Butz, O. Sigaud, & P. Gérard (Eds.), Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems, LNAI 2684 (pp. 66–85). Springer.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
Wohlschlger, A., Gattis, M., & Bekkering, H. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 358, 501–515. Article Google Scholar
Wolfe, B., James, M. R., & Singh, S. (2005). Learning predictive state representations in dynamical systems without reset. In ICML ’05: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine learning (pp. 980–987). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
Wolfe, B., & Singh, S. (2006). Predictive state representations with options. In ICML ’06: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine learning (pp. 1025–1032). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
Wolpert, D. M. (1997). Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 209–216. Article Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593–602. Article Google Scholar
Wolpert, D., & Flanagan, J. (2001). Motor prediction. Current Biology, 11, R729–R732. Article Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., Gharamani, Z., & Jordan, M. (1995). An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science, 269, 1179–1182. Article Google Scholar
Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11(7–8), 1317–1329. Article Google Scholar
Ziemke, T., Jirenhed, D.-A., & Hesslow, G. (2005). Internal simulation of perception: A minimal neuro-robotic model. Neurocomputing, 68, 85–104. Article Google Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Balkenius, C. (2001). Introduction: Why “epigenetic robotics”? In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems (Vol. 85, pp. 1–4). Lund University Cognitive Studies.
Zlatev, J., Persson, T., & Gardenfors, P. (2005). Bodily mimesis as ’the missing link’ in human cognitive evolution. Technical Report LUCS121, Lund University Cognitive Science, Lund, Sweden.