Regional and global projections of twenty-first century glacier mass changes in response to climate scenarios from global climate models (original) (raw)

Abstract

A large component of present-day sea-level rise is due to the melt of glaciers other than the ice sheets. Recent projections of their contribution to global sea-level rise for the twenty-first century range between 70 and 180 mm, but bear significant uncertainty due to poor glacier inventory and lack of hypsometric data. Here, we aim to update the projections and improve quantification of their uncertainties by using a recently released global inventory containing outlines of almost every glacier in the world. We model volume change for each glacier in response to transient spatially-differentiated temperature and precipitation projections from 14 global climate models with two emission scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) prepared for the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The multi-model mean suggests sea-level rise of 155 ± 41 mm (RCP4.5) and 216 ± 44 mm (RCP8.5) over the period 2006–2100, reducing the current global glacier volume by 29 or 41 %. The largest contributors to projected global volume loss are the glaciers in the Canadian and Russian Arctic, Alaska, and glaciers peripheral to the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets. Although small contributors to global volume loss, glaciers in Central Europe, low-latitude South America, Caucasus, North Asia, and Western Canada and US are projected to lose more than 80 % of their volume by 2100. However, large uncertainties in the projections remain due to the choice of global climate model and emission scenario. With a series of sensitivity tests we quantify additional uncertainties due to the calibration of our model with sparsely observed glacier mass changes. This gives an upper bound for the uncertainty range of ±84 mm sea-level rise by 2100 for each projection.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 2

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 3

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 4

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 5

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 6

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 7

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 8

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 9

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 10

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Fig. 11

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding was provided by NASA grant (NNH10Z1A001N and NNX11AO23G) and NSF (grant EAR-0943742). We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their comments which helped us to significantly improve the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences Department, University of British Columbia, 2020–2207 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
    Valentina Radić & Evan Miles
  2. Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 903 Koyukuk Dr., Fairbanks, AK, 99775-7320, USA
    Andrew Bliss, A. Cody Beedlow & Regine Hock
  3. Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1ER, UK
    Evan Miles
  4. Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, K9J 7B8, Canada
    J. Graham Cogley

Authors

  1. Valentina Radić
  2. Andrew Bliss
  3. A. Cody Beedlow
  4. Regine Hock
  5. Evan Miles
  6. J. Graham Cogley

Corresponding author

Correspondence toValentina Radić.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Radić, V., Bliss, A., Beedlow, A.C. et al. Regional and global projections of twenty-first century glacier mass changes in response to climate scenarios from global climate models.Clim Dyn 42, 37–58 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1719-7

Download citation

Keywords