Device-independent quantum secure direct communication under non-Markovian quantum channels (original) (raw)

References

  1. Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A., Adleman, L.: A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems. Commun. ACM 21(2), 120–126 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1145/359340.359342
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  2. Shor, P.W.: Algorithms for quantum computation: discrete logarithms and factoring. in Proceedings 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Santa Fe, NM, USA, (1994), pp. 124-134. https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1994.365700
  3. Grover, L.K.: A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search. arXiv:quant-ph/9605043 (1996). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9605043
  4. Long, G.L.: Grover algorithm with zero theoretical failure rate. Phys. Rev. A 64, 022307 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.022307
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  5. Gisin, N., Ribordy, G., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H.: Quantum cryptography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 145 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  6. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., Jozsa, R., Peres, A., Wootters, W.K.: Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classic and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895–1899 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, C.H.: Quantum cryptography using any two nonorthogonal states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3121 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.3121
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  8. Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum cryptography, public key distribution and coin tossing. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 560(Part 1), 7–11 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  9. Ekert, A.K.: Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 661 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  10. Long, G.L., Liu, X.S.: Theoretically efficient high-capacity quantum-key-distribution scheme. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032302
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  11. Hillery, M., Bužek, V., Berthiaume, A.: Quantum secret sharing. Phys. Rev. A 59, 1829 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.59.1829
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  12. Degen, C.L., Reinhard, F., Cappellaro, P.: Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  13. Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys 81, 865 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  14. Uola, R., Costa, Ana C.S.., Nguyen, H. Chau., Gühne, O.: Quantum steering. Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015001
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  15. Brunner, N., Cavalcanti, D., Pironio, S., Scarani, V., Wehner, S.: Bell nonlocality. Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  16. Eisaman, M.D., Fan, J., Migdall, A., Polyakov, S.V.: Invited Review Article: Single-photon sources and detectors. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 071101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3610677
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  17. Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Pironio, S., Scarani, V.: Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 230501 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.230501
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  18. Pawłowski, M.: Security proof for cryptographic protocols based only on the monogamy of Bell’s inequality violations. Phys. Rev. A 82, 032313 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.032313
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  19. Pramanik, T., Kaplan, M., Majumdar, A.S.: Fine-grained Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering inequalities. Phys. Rev. A 90, 050305(R) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.90.050305
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Vazirani, U., Vidick, T.: Fully device independent quantum key Distribution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.140501
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  21. Khan, I., Heim, B., Neuzner, A., Marquardt, C.: Satellite-based qkd. Opt. Photonics News 29(2), 26–33 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPN.29.2.000026
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  22. Tang, B.Y., Liu, B., Zhai, Y.P., et al.: High-speed and large-scale privacy amplification scheme for quantum key distribution. Sci. Rep. 9, 15733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50290-1
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  23. Kołodyński, J., Máttar, A., Skrzypczyk, P., Woodhead, E., Cavalcanti, D., Banaszek, K., Acín, A.: (2020) Device-independent quantum key distribution with single-photon sources. Quantum 4, 260. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-04-30-260
  24. Farkas, M., Juandó, M.B., Łukanowski, K., Kołodyński, J., Acín, A.: Bell nonlocality is not sufficient for the security of standard device-independent quantum key distribution protocols. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 050503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.050503
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  25. Singh, J., Ghosh, S., Arvind-Goyal, S.K.: Role of Bell-CHSH violation and local filtering in quantum key distribution. Phys. Lett. A. 392, 127158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127158
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  26. Nadlinger, D.P., Drmota, P., Nichol, B.C., Araneda, G., Main, D., Srinivas, R., Lucas, D.M., Ballance, C.J., Ivanov, K., Tan, E.Y.-Z., Sekatski, P., Urbanke, R.L., Renner, R., Sangouard, N., Bancal, J.-D.: Experimental quantum key distribution certified by Bell’s theorem. Nature 607, 682–686 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04941-5
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  27. Wath, Y., Hariprasad, M., Shah, F., Gupta, S.: Eavesdropping a Quantum Key Distribution network using sequential quantum unsharp measurement attacks. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03664-4
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Bera, S., Gupta, S., Majumdar, A.S.: Device-independent quantum key distribution using random quantum states. Quant. Inf. Process 22, 109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-03852-2
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  29. Takahashi, R., Tanizawa, Y., Dixon, A.: A high-speed key management method for quantum key distribution network, in Eleventh International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Zagreb, Croatia, (2019), pp. 437-442. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8806052
  30. Liu, X., Luo, D., Lin, G.L., Chen, Z.H., Huang, C.F., Li, S.Z., Zhang, C.X., Zhang, Z.R., Wei, K.J.: Fiber-based quantum secure direct communication without active polarization compensation. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65(12), 120311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-022-1976-0
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  31. Sheng, Y.B., Zhou, L., Long, G.L.: One-step quantum secure direct communication. Sci. Bull. (Beijing) 67(4), 367 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.11.002
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  32. Ying, J.W., Zhou, L., Zhong, W., Sheng, Y.B.: Measurement-device-independent one-step quantum secure direct communication. Chin. Phys. B 31(12), 120303 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ac8f37
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  33. Cao, Z.W., Lu, Y., Chai, G., Yu, H., Liang, K.X., Wang, L.: Realization of Quantum Secure Direct Communication with Continuous Variable. Research 6, 0193 (2023). https://doi.org/10.34133/research.0193
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Zhao, P., Zhong, W., Du, M.M., Li, X.Y., Zhou, L., Sheng, Y.B.: Quantum secure direct communication with hybrid entanglement. Frontiers Phys. 19, 51201 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11467-024-1396-5
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Zhu, P.H., Zhong, W., Du, M.M., Li, X.Y., Zhou, L., Sheng, Y.B.: One-step quantum dialogue. Chin. Phys. B 33, 030302 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ad1c5c
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Zhang, C., Zhou, L., Zhong, W., Du, M.M., Sheng, Y.B.: Measurement-device-independent quantum dialogue based on entanglement swapping and phase encoding. Quant. Inf. Process 23, 52 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-024-04260-w
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  37. Ahn, B., Park, J., Lee, J., Lee, S.: High-dimensional single photon based quantum secure direct communication using time and phase mode degrees. Sci. Rep. 14, 888 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51212-6
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  38. Gupta, S.: Experimental simulation of the quantum secure direct communication using MATLAB and Simulink. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 913 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04532-x
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Zhang, W., Ding, D.S., Sheng, Y.B., Zhou, L., Shi, B.S., Guo, G.C.: Quantum secure direct communication with quantum memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 220501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.220501
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  40. Wang, M., Zhang, W., Guo, J.X., Song, X.T., Long, G.L.: Experimental demonstration of secure relay in quantum secure direct communication network. Entropy 25(11), 1548 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/e25111548
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  41. Qi, Z., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Feng, J., Zheng, Y., Chen, X.: A 15-user quantum secure direct communication network. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00634-2
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  42. Zhang, H., Sun, Z., Qi, R., Yin, L., Long, G.L., Lu, J.: Realization of quantum secure direct communication over 100 km fiber with time-bin and phase quantum states. Light Sci. Appl. 11, 83 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00769-w
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  43. Long, G.-L., Pan, D., Sheng, Y.-B., Xue, Q., Lu, J., Hanzo, L.: An evolutionary pathway for the quantum internet relying on secure classical repeaters. IEEE Netw. 36(3), 82–88 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.108.2100375
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Paparelle, I., Mousavi, F., Scazza, F., Bassi, A., Paris, M., Zavatta, A.: Practical quantum secure direct communication with squeezed states. arXiv:2306.14322 [quant-ph] (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.14322
  45. Pan, D., Lin, Z., Wu, J., Zhang, H., Sun, Z., Ruan, D., Yin, L., Long, G.L.: Experimental free-space quantum secure direct communication and its security analysis. Photonics Res. 8, 1522–1531 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/PRJ.388790
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Zhang, Q., Du, M.M., Zhong, W., Sheng, Y.B., Zhou, L.: Single-photon based three-party quantum secure direct communication with identity authentication. Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 536, 2300407 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202300407
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Yang, L., Wu, J., Lin, Z., Yin, L., Long, G.: Quantum secure direct communication with entanglement source and single-photon measurement. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 110311 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-020-1576-y
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  48. Xiao, Y.-X., Zhou, L., Zhong, W., Du, M.-M., Sheng, Y.-B.: The hyperentanglement-based quantum secure direct communication protocol with single-photon measurement. Quant. Inf. Process 22, 339 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-04097-9
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  49. Sun, Z.Z., Pan, D., Ruan, D., Long, G.L.: One-sided measurement-device-independent practical quantum secure direct communication. J. Lightw. Technol. 41(14), 4680–4690 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2023.3244880
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  50. Hong, Y.-P., Zhou, L., Zhong, W., Sheng, Y.-B.: Measurement-device-independent three-party quantum secure direct communication. Quant. Inf. Process 22, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-03853-1
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  51. Li, X.-J., Pan, D., Long, G.-L., Hanzo, L.: Single-photon-memory measurement-device-independent quantum secure direct communication-part II: a practical protocol and its secrecy capacity. IEEE Commun. Lett. 27(4), 1060–1064 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2023.3247176
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Zhou, Z.R., Sheng, Y.B., Niu, P.H., Yin, L.G., Long, G.L., Hanzo, L.: Measurement-device-independent quantum secure direct communication. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 230362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-019-1450-8
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  53. Niu, P.H., Wu, J.W., Yin, L.G., Long, G.L.: Security analysis of measurement-device-independent quantum secure direct communication. Quant. Inf. Process 19, 356 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-020-02840-0
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  54. Cao, Z., Wang, L., Liang, K., Chai, G., Peng, J.: Continuous-variable quantum secure direct communication based on gaussian mapping. Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 024012 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.024012
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  55. Zhou, L., Sheng, Y.B., Long, G.L.: Device-independent quantum secure direct communication against collective attacks. Sci. Bull. 65, 12–20 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2019.10.025
    Article Google Scholar
  56. Zhou, L., Sheng, Y.B.: One-step device-independent quantum secure direct communication. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 65, 250311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-021-1863-9
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  57. Zhou, L., Xu, B.-W., Zhong, W., Sheng, Y.-B.: Device-independent quantum secure direct communication with single-photon sources. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 014036 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014036
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  58. Zeng, H., Du, M.-M., Zhong, W., Zhou, L., Sheng, Y.-B.: High-capacity device-independent quantum secure direct communication based on hyper-encoding. Fundam. Res. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmre.2023.11.006
    Article Google Scholar
  59. Metger, T., Dulek, Y., Coladangelo, A., Friedman, R.A.: Device-independent quantum key distribution from computational assumptions. New J. Phys. 23, 123021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ac304b
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  60. Xu, F., Zhang, Y.Z., Zhang, Q., Pan, J.: Device-independent quantum key distribution with random post selection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 110506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.110506
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  61. Singh, A., Dev, K., Siljak, H., Joshi, H.D., Magarini, M.: Quantum internet-applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, challenges, and research directions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 23(4), 2218–2247 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3109944
    Article Google Scholar
  62. Pan, D., Long, G.-L., Yin, L., Sheng, Y.-B., Ruan, D., Ng, S.X., Lu, J., Hanzo, L.: The evolution of quantum secure direct communication: on the road to the qinternet. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. (Early Access). (2024). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3367535
    Article Google Scholar
  63. Yu, T., Eberly, J.H.: Finite-time disentanglement via spontaneous emission. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 140404 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.140404
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  64. Dodd, P.J., Halliwell, J.J.: Disentanglement and decoherence by open system dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052105 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052105
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  65. Yu, T., Eberly, J.H.: Quantum open system theory. Bipartite Aspects Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140403 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.140403
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  66. Almeida, M.P., de Melo, F., Hor-Meyll, M., Salles, A., Walborn, S.P., Ribeiro, P.H.S., Davidovich, L.: Environment-induced sudden death of entanglement. Science 316, 579 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139892
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  67. Bellomo, B., Franco, R.L., Maniscalco, S., Compagno, G.: Entanglement trapping in structured environments. Phys. Rev. A 78, 060302(R) (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.060302
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  68. Salles, A., de Melo, F., Almeida, M.P., Hor-Meyll, M., Walborn, S.P., Ribeiro, P.H.S., Davidovich, L.: Experimental investigation of the dynamics of entanglement: sudden death, complementarity, and continuous monitoring of the environment. Phys. Rev. A 78, 022322 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.022322
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  69. Yu, T., Eberly, J.H.: Sudden death of entanglement. Science 323, 598 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167343
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  70. Badziag, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: Local environment can enhance fidelity of quantum teleportation. Phys. Rev. A 62, 012311 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.012311
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  71. Bandyopadhyay, S.: Origin of noisy states whose teleportation fidelity can be enhanced through dissipation. Phys. Rev. A 65, 022302 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.022302
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  72. Ghosh, B., Majumdar, A.S., Nayak, N.: Environment assisted entanglement enhancement. Phys. Rev. A 74, 052315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.052315
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  73. Gupta, R., Gupta, S., Mal, S., De Sen, A.: Performance of dense coding and teleportation for random states: augmentation via pre-processing. Phys. Rev. A 103, 032608 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032608
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  74. Franco, R.L., Compagno, G.. Lectures on General Quantum Correlations and their Applications, in Lectures on General Quantum Correlations and their Applications, edited by F. F. Fanchini, D. O. S. Pinto, and G. Adesso, Springer, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53412-1
  75. Mazzola, L., Maniscalco, S., Piilo, J., Suominen, K.-A., Garraway, B.M.: Sudden death and sudden birth of entanglement in common structured reservoirs. Phys. Rev. A 79, 042302 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042302
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  76. Gupta, R., Gupta, S., Mal, S., De Sen, A.: Constructive feedback of non-markovianity on resources in random quantum states. Phys. Rev. A 105, 012424 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.105.012424
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  77. Pramanik, T., Majumdar, A.S.: Improving the fidelity of teleportation through noisy channels using weak measurement. Phys. Lett. A 377, 3209 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.10.012
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  78. Datta, S., Goswami, S., Pramanik, T., Majumdar, A.S.: Preservation of a lower bound of quantum secret key rate in the presence of decoherence. Phys. Lett. A 381, 897 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.01.019
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  79. Gupta, S., Datta, S., Majumdar, A.S.: Preservation of quantum non-bilocal correlations in noisy entanglement-swapping experiments using weak measurements. Phys. Rev. A 98, 042322 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.042322
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  80. Goswami, S., Ghosh, S., Majumdar, A.S.: Protecting quantum correlations in the presence of amplitude damping channel. Phys. A Math. Theor. 54, 045302 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abd59f
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  81. Laine, E.-M., Breuer, H.-P., Piilo, J.: Nonlocal memory effects allow perfect teleportation with mixed states. Sci. Rep. 4, 4620 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04620
    Article Google Scholar
  82. Altherr, A., Yang, Y.: Quantum metrology for non-markovian processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 060501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.060501
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  83. Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharya, B., Majumdar, A.S.: Thermodynamic utility of non-Markovianity from the perspective of resource interconversion. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 53, 335301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aba0ee
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  84. Bhattacharya, S., Bhattacharya, B., Majumdar, A.S.: Convex resource theory of non-Markovianity. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 54, 035302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/abd191
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  85. Liu, B.-H., Li, L., Huang, Y., Li, C.-F., Guo, G.-C., Laine, E.-M., Breuer, H.-P., Piilo, J.: Experimental control of the transition from Markovian to non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems. Nature Phys. 7, 931 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2085
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  86. Mele, F.A., De Palma, G., Fanizza, M., Giovannetti, V., Lami, L.: Optical fibres with memory effects and their quantum communication capacities, arXiv:2309.17066 [quant-ph] (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.17066
  87. Mele, F.A., Lami, L., Giovannetti, V.: Restoring Quantum Communication Efficiency over High Loss Optical Fibers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 180501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.180501
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  88. Mele, F.A., Lami, L., Giovannetti, V.: Quantum optical communication in the presence of strong attenuation noise. Phys. Rev. A 106, 042437 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.042437
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  89. Wootters, W., Zurek, W.: A single quantum cannot be cloned. Nature 299, 802–803 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299802a0
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  90. Deng, F.G., Long, G.L.: Secure direct communication with a quantum one-time pad. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052319 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052319
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  91. Deng, F.G., Long, G.L., Liu, X.S.: Two-step quantum direct communication protocol using the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pair block. Phys. Rev. A 68, 042317 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.042317
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  92. Rivas, A., Huelga, S.F., Plenio, M.B.: Entanglement and Non-Markovianity of quantum evolutions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 050403 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.050403
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  93. Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J.: Measure for the degree of Non-Markovian behavior of quantum processes in open systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 210401 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.210401
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  94. Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., Breuer, H.-P.: Measure for the non-Markovianity of quantum processes. Phys. Rev. A 81, 062115 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.81.062115
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  95. Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J., Breuer, H.-P.: Quantum non-Markovianity: characterization, quantification and detection. Rep. Progr. Phys. 77, 094001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/9/094001
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  96. Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Vacchini, B.: Colloquium: Non-Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.021002
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  97. Bellomo, B., Lo Franco, R., Compagno, G.: Non-Markovian effects on the dynamics of entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 160502 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.160502
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  98. Utagi, S., Srikanth, R., Banerjee, S.: Temporal self-similarity of quantum dynamical maps as a concept of memorylessness. Sci. Rep. 10, 20767 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72211-3
    Article Google Scholar
  99. Scarani, V., Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H., Cerf, N.J., Dusek, M., Lutkenhaus, N., Peev, M.: The security of practical quantum key distribution. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1301 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1301
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  100. Devetak, I., Winter, A.: Distillation of secret key and entanglement from quantum states. Royal Soc. 461, 1372 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2004.1372
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  101. Pironio, S., Acín, A., Brunner, N., Gisin, N., Massar, S., Scarani, V.: Device-independent quantum key distribution secure against collective attacks. New J. Phys. 11, 045021 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/045021
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  102. Holevo, A.S.: Bounds for the quantity of information transmitted by a quantum communication channel. Problemy Peredachi Informatsii (1973). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:118312737
  103. Hu, J.Y., Yu, B., Jing, M.Y., et al.: Experimental quantum secure direct communication with single photons. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.144
    Article Google Scholar
  104. Tang, J.-S., Li, C.-F., Li, Y.-L., Zou, X.-B., Guo, G.-C., Breuer, H.-P., Laine, E.-M., Piilo, J.: Measuring non-Markovianity of processes with controllable system-environment interaction. EPL 97, 10002 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/97/10002
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  105. Passos, M., Obando, P., Balthazar, W., Paula, F., Huguenin, J., Sarandy, M.: Non-Markovianity through quantum coherence in an all-optical setup. Opt. Lett. 44, 2478–2481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.002478
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  106. Kuhr, S., Gleyzes, S., Guerlin, C., Bernu, J., Hoff, U.B., Deléglise, S., Osnaghi, S., Brune, M., Raimond, J.-M., Haroche, S., et al.: Ultrahigh finesse Fabry-Pérot superconducting resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 16 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2724816
    Article Google Scholar
  107. Milul, O., Guttel, B., Goldblatt, U., Hazanov, S., Joshi, L.M., Chausovsky, D., Kahn, N., Çiftyürek, E., Lafont, F., Rosenblum, S.: Superconducting cavity qubit with tens of milliseconds single-photon coherence time. PRX Quant. 4, 030336 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.030336
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  108. Zapatero, V., Curty, M.: Long-distance device-independent quantum key distribution. Sci. Rep. 9, 17749 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53803-0
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  109. Wang, K.-H., Chen, S.-H., Lin, Y.-C., Li, C.-M.: Non-Markovianity of photon dynamics in a birefringent crystal. Phys. Rev. A 98, 043850 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.043850
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references