Can common adhesion molecules and microtopography affect cellular elasticity? A combined atomic force microscopy and optical study (original) (raw)
A-Hassan E et al (1998) Relative microelastic mapping of living cells by atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 74(3):1564–1578 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Berdyyeva TK, Woodworth CD, Sokolov I (2005) Human epithelial cells increase their rigidity with ageing in vitro: direct measurements. Phys Med Biol 50(1):81–92 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Burridge K, ChrzanowskaWodnicka M (1996) Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12:463–518 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Butt HJ, Cappella B, Kappl M (2005) Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 59(1–6):1–152 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Chen CS et al (2003) Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 307(2):355–361 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Clark P et al (1990) Topographical control of cell behavior. 2. multiple grooved substrate. Development 108(4):635–644 CASPubMed Google Scholar
Costa KD, Yin FCP (1999) Analysis of indentation: Implications for measuring mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy. J Biomech Eng Trans ASME 121(5):462–471 ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Cross SE et al (2007) Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol 2(12):780–783 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dalby MJ (2005) Topographically induced direct cell mechanotransduction. Med Eng Phys 27(9):730–742 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Darling EM et al (2008) Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J Biomech 41(2):454–464 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Discher D et al (2009) Biomechanics: cell research and applications for the next decade. Annu Biomed Eng 37(5):847–859 Article Google Scholar
Dulinska I et al (2006) Stiffness of normal and pathological erythrocytes studied by means of atomic force microscopy. J Biochem Biophys Methods 66(1–3):1–11 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Engler AJ et al (2006) Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126(4):677–689 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Engler AJ et al (2008) Embryonic cardiomyocytes beat best on a matrix with heart-like elasticity: scar-like rigidity inhibits beating. J Cell Sci 121(22):3794–3802 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fabry B et al (2001) Signal transduction in smooth muscle—selected contribution: time course and heterogeneity of contractile responses in cultured human airway smooth muscle cells. J Appl Physiol 91(2):986–994 CASPubMed Google Scholar
Faulstich H, Trischmann H, Mayer D (1983) Preparation of tetramethylrhodaminyl-phalloidin and uptake of the toxin into short-term cultured-hepatocytes by endocytosis. Exp Cell Res 144(1):73–82 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Folch A, Toner M (2000) Microengineering of cellular interactions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2:227–235 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Guck J et al (2005) Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys J 88(5):3689–3698 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Guilak F et al (2009) Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell 5(1):17–26 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ingber DE et al (1994) Celluar tensegrity—exploring how mechanical changes in the cytoskeleton regulate cell—growth, migration, and tissue pattern during morphogenesis. In: International review of cytology—a survey of cell biology, vol 150. Academic Press Inc, San Diego, pp 173–224
Janmey PA (1998) The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiol Rev 78(3):763–781 CASPubMed Google Scholar
Janmey PA, McCulloch CA (2007) Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 9:1–34 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kramer RH, Shen XD, Zhou H (2005) Tumor cell invasion and survival in head and neck cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 24(1):35–45 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kuznetsova TG et al (2007) Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity. Micron 38(8):824–833 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Li QS et al (2008) AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 374(4):609–613 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lieber SC et al (2004) Aging increases stiffness of cardiac myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287(2):H645–H651 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lussi JW et al (2006) Pattern stability under cell culture conditions—a comparative study of patterning methods based on PLL-g-PEG background passivation. Biomaterials 27(12):2534–2541 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mahaffy RE et al (2004) Quantitative analysis of the viscoelastic properties of thin regions of fibroblasts using atomic force microscopy. Biophys J 86(3):1777–1793 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mathur AB et al (2001) Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomech 34(12):1545–1553 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Pajerowski JD et al (2007) Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(40):15619–15624 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Parker KK et al (2002) Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces. FASEB J 16(10):10 Article Google Scholar
Paszek MJ et al (2005) Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell 8(3):241–254 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Radmacher M (1997) Measuring the elastic properties of biological samples with the AFM. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 16(2):47–57 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rosenbluth MJ, Lam WA, Fletcher DA (2006) Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. Biophys J 90(8):2994–3003 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rotsch C, Radmacher M (2000) Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys J 78(1):520–535 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Smith BA et al (2005) Probing the viscoelastic behavior of cultured airway smooth muscle cells with atomic force microscopy: Stiffening induced by contractile agonist. Biophys J 88(4):2994–3007 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sørensen A et al (2007) Long-term neurite orientation on astrocyte monolayers aligned by microtopography. Biomaterials 28(36):5498–5508 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Takai E et al (2005) Osteoblast elastic modulus measured by atomic force microscopy is substrate dependent. Annu Biomed Eng 33(7):963–971 Article Google Scholar
Tao NJ, Lindsay SM, Lees S (1992) Measuring the microelastic properties of biological—material. Biophys J 63(4):1165–1169 ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang N et al (2002) Cell prestress. I. Stiffness and prestress are closely associated in adherent contractile cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282(3):C606–C616 CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wozniak MJ et al (2009) Monitoring of mechanical properties of serially passaged bovine articular chondrocytes by atomic force microscopy. Micron 40(8):870–875 ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Yim EKF et al (2010) Nanotopography-induced changes in focal adhesions, cytoskeletal organization, and mechanical properties of human mesenchymal stem cells_._ Biomaterials 31(6):1299–1306 Google Scholar
Yu LMY, Leipzig ND, Shoichet MS (2008) Promoting neuron adhesion and growth. Mater Today 11(5):36–43 ArticleCAS Google Scholar