Parthenogenesis in the Mouse (original) (raw)

Nature volume 242, pages 475–476 (1973)Cite this article

Abstract

In vitro treatment of mouse eggs with hyaluronidase can activate them to develop parthenogenetically as well as denuding them of cumulus cells1–4. Activation and subsequent behaviour of the eggs depend on certain defined conditions. Szollosi5 observed morphological changes in unfertilized mouse eggs in vivo after approximately 14 h in the oviduct. Rotation and migration of the spindle towards the centre of the egg was the first and most obvious change. This prepares the egg for equal cleavage rather than the usual unequal division which results in the formation of the second polar body. Graham3 stimulated eggs 12–17 h after ovulation and obtained about 30% “immediate cleavage”6 in the activated group, whereas Tarkowski7,8 applied an electric shock to the exposed oviduct 2–4 h after ovulation and obtained activation in approximately 50% but a very low incidence of immediate cleavage. This suggested that the time of activation after ovulation might be important in the type of parthenogenones induced. Eggs were considered to have undergone immediate cleavage only if, at the time of examination, they were morphologically indistinguishable from a normal fertilized two-cell egg—that is, apart from the absence of a second polar body. They resulted from a biochemical or experimental stimulus other than that provided by fertilization. The few eggs with unequal blastomeres were therefore not included in this group.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Graham, C. F., Symp. Wistar Inst., No. 9, 19 (1969).
  2. Graham, C. F., Nature, 226, 165 (1970).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Graham, C. F., Adv. Biosci., 6, 87 (1971).
    Google Scholar
  4. Graham, C. F., Adv. Biosci., 8, 263 (1972).
    Google Scholar
  5. Szollosi, D., Amer. J. Anat., 130, 209 (1971).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Braden, A. W. H., and Austin, C. R., Exp. Cell Res., 7, 277 (1954).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Tarkowski, A. K., J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl., 14, 31 (1971).
    CAS Google Scholar
  8. Tarkowski, A. K., Witkowska, A., and Nowicka, J., Nature, 226, 162 (1970).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Whittingham, D. G., J. Reprod. Fert., Suppl., 14, 7 (1971).
    CAS Google Scholar
  10. Fowler, R. E., and Edwards, R. G., J. Endocrin., 15, 374 (1957).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Marston, J. H., and Chang, M. C., J. Exp. Zool., 155, 237 (1964).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Fankhauser, G., and Godwin, D., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 34, 544 (1948).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  13. Braden, A. W. H., J. Genetics, 55, 476 (1957).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Physiological Laboratory, Cambridge, CB2 3EG
    M. H. KAUFMAN

Authors

  1. M. H. KAUFMAN
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KAUFMAN, M. Parthenogenesis in the Mouse.Nature 242, 475–476 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/242475a0

Download citation

This article is cited by