Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila (original) (raw)

Nature volume 351, pages 652–654 (1991)Cite this article

Abstract

PROTEINS often differ in amino-acid sequence across species. This difference has evolved by the accumulation of neutral mutations by random drift, the fixation of adaptive mutations by selection, or a mixture of the two. Here we propose a simple statistical test of the neutral protein evolution hypothesis based on a comparison of the number of amino-acid replacement substitutions to synonymous substitutions in the coding region of a locus. If the observed substitutions are neutral, the ratio of replacement to synonymous fixed differences between species should be the same as the ratio of replacement to synonymous polymorphisms within species. DNA sequence data on the Adh locus (encoding alcohol dehydrogenase, EC 1.1.1.1) in three species in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup do not fit this expectation; instead, there are more fixed replacement differences between species than expected. We suggest that these excess replacement substitutions result from adaptive fixation of selectively advantageous mutations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry (Freeman, San Francisco, 1981).
    MATH Google Scholar
  2. Lewontin, R. C. A. Rev. Genet. 19, 81–102 (1985).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Kreitman, M. & Hudson, R. R. Genetics 127, 565–582 (1991).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Nei, M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Columbia University Press, New York, 1987).
    Google Scholar
  5. Sharp, P. M. & Li, W.-H. J. molec. Evol. 28, 398–402 (1989).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Kreitman, M. Nature 304, 412–417 (1983).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Haldane, J. B. S. J. Genet. 57, 511–524 (1957).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Maynard Smith, J. Nature 219, 1114–1116 (1968).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Sved, J. A. Am. Nat. 102, 283–293 (1968).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Collet, C. J. molec. Evol. 27, 142–146 (1988).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Bodmer, M. & Ashburner, M. Nature 309, 425–430 (1984).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  12. Cohn, V. H. & Moore, G. P. Molec. Biol. Evol. 5, 154–166 (1988).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Zagursky, R. J., Baumeister, K., Lomas, N. & Berman, M. L. Gene Analyt. Techn. 2, 89–94 (1985).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Saiki, R. K., Bugawan, T. L., Horn, G. T., Mullis, K. B. & Erlich, H. A. Nature 324, 163–166 (1988).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Higuchi, R. G. & Ochman, H. Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 5865 (1989).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544, USA
    John H. McDonald & Martin Kreitman

Authors

  1. John H. McDonald
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Martin Kreitman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonald, J., Kreitman, M. Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.Nature 351, 652–654 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1038/351652a0

Download citation

This article is cited by