Genetic instability in colorectal cancers (original) (raw)

Nature volume 386, pages 623–627 (1997)Cite this article

Abstract

It has long been considered that genetic instability is an integral component of human neoplasia1–3. In a small fraction of tumours, mismatch repair deficiency leads to a microsatellite instability at the nucleotide sequence level4,5. In other tumours, an abnormal chromosome number (aneuploidy) has suggested an instability, but the nature and magnitude of the postulated instability is a matter of conjecture. We show here that colorectal tumours without microsatellite instability exhibit a striking defect in chromosome segregation, resulting in gains or losses in excess of 10 –2 per chromosome per generation. This form of chromosomal instability reflected a continuing cellular defect that persisted throughout the lifetime of the tumour cell and was not simply related to chromosome number. While microsatellite instability is a recessive trait6,7, chromosomal instability appeared to be dominant. These data indicate that persistent genetic instability may be critical for the development of all colorectal cancers, and that such instability can arise through two distinct pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Loeb, L. Mutator phenotype may be required for multistage carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 51, 3075–3079 (1991).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Hartwell, L. Defects in a cell cycle checkpoint may be responsible for the genomic instability of cancer cells. Cell 71, 543–546 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Heim, S. & Mitelman, F. Cancer Cytogenetics (Liss, New York, 1987).
    Google Scholar
  4. Marra, G. & Boland, C. R. Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: the syndrome, the genes, and historical perspectives. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 87, 1114–1125 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya, N. P., Skandalis, A., Ganesh, A., Groden, J. & Meuth, M. Mutator phenotypes in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7555–7559 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Koi, M. et al. Human chromosome 3 corrects mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability and reduces N-methyl-N’-N-nitrosoguanidine tolerance in colon tumor cells with homozygous hMLHl mutation. Cancer Res. 54, 4302–4312 (1994).
    Google Scholar
  7. Casares, S., lonov, Y., Ge, H.-Y., Standbridge, E. & Perucho, M. The microsatellite mutator phenotype of colon cancer cells is often recessive. Oncogene 11, 2303–2310 (1995).
    CAS Google Scholar
  8. Lichter, P., Boyle, A. L., Cremer, T. & Ward, D. Analysis of genes and chromosomes by nonisotopic in situ hybridization. Gen. Anal. Tech. Appl. 8, 24–35 (1991).
    CAS Google Scholar
  9. Hartwell, L., Weinert, T., Kadyk, L. & Garvik, B. Cell cycle checkpoints, genomic integrity, and cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 59, 259–263 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Mayer, V. W. & Aguilera, A. High levels of chromosome instability in polyploids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mut. Res. 231, 177–186 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Shackney, S. et al. Model for the genetic evolution of human solid tumors. Cancer Res. 49, 3344–3354 (1989).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Tanaka, K. et al. Suppression of tumorigenicity in human colon carcinoma cells by introduction of normal chromosome 5 or 18. Nature 349, 340–342 (1991).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  13. Goyette, M. C. et al. Progression of colorectal cancer is associated with multiple tumor suppressor gene defects but inhibition of tumorigeneity is accomplished by correction of any single defect via chromosome transfer. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 1387–1395 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Rodrigues, N. R. et al. p53 mutations in colorectal cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7555–7559 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Shibata, D., Peinado, M. A., lonov, Y., Malkhosyan, S. & Perucho, M. Genomic instability in repeated sequences is an early somatic event in colorectal tumorigenesis that persists after transformation. Nature Genet. 6, 273–281 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Huang, J. et al. APC mutations in colorectal tumors with mismatch repair deficiency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 9049–9054 (1996).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Aaltonen, L. A. et al. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science 260, 812–816 (1993).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Bocker, M. et al. Genomic instability in colorectal carcinomas: comparison of different evaluation methods and their biological significance. J. Path. 179, 15–19 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Livingston, L. R. et al. Altered cell cycle arrest and gene amplification potential accompany loss of wild-type p53. Cell 70, 923–935 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Yin, Y., Tainsky, M. A., Bischoff, F. Z., Strong, L. C. & Wahl, G. M. Wild-type p53 restores cell cycle control and inhibits gene amplification in cells with mutant p53 alleles. Cell 70, 937–948 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Cottu, P. H. et al. Inverse correlation between RER+ status and p53 mutation in colorectal cancer cell lines. Oncogene 13, 2727–2730 (1996).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Papadopoulos, N. et al. Mutation of the mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science 263, 1625–1629 (1994).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Papadopoulos, N. et al. Mutations of GTBP in genetically unstable cells. Science 268, 1915–1917 (1995).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  24. Umar, A. et al. Defective mismatch repair in extracts of colorectal and endometrial cancer lines exhibiting microsatellite instability. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14367–14370 (1994).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Hollstein, M. et al. Database of p53 gene somatic mutations in human tumors and cell lines. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 3551–3555 (1994).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  26. Ried, T. et al. Specific metaphase and interphase detection of the breakpoint region in 8q24 of Burkitt lymphoma cells by triple-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genes Chrom. Cancer 4, 69–74 (1992).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Lichter, P. & Cremer, T. in Human Cytogenetics: A Practical Approach (eds Rooney, D. E. & Czepulkowski, B. H.) 157–192 (IRL, Oxford, 1992).
    Google Scholar
  28. Lengauer, C. et al. Large-scale isolation of human Ip36-specific PI clones and their use for fluorescence in situ hybridization. Gen. Anal Tech. Appl. 11, 140–147 (1994).
    CAS Google Scholar
  29. Ried, T., Baldini, A., Rand, T. C. & Ward, D. C. Simultaneous visualization of seven different DNA probes by in situ hybridization using combinatorial fluorescence and digital imaging microscopy. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 89, 1388–1392 (1992).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute and The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, USA
    C. Lengauer, K. W. Kinzler & B. Vogelstein

Authors

  1. C. Lengauer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. K. W. Kinzler
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. B. Vogelstein
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. & Vogelstein, B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers.Nature 386, 623–627 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/386623a0

Download citation

This article is cited by