Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host–pathogen 'tragedy of the commons' (original) (raw)

Nature volume 442, pages 75–78 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Fragmented populations possess an intriguing duplicity: even if subpopulations are reliably extinction-prone, asynchrony in local extinctions and recolonizations makes global persistence possible1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Migration is a double-edged sword in such cases: too little migration prevents recolonization of extinct patches, whereas too much synchronizes subpopulations, raising the likelihood of global extinction. Both edges of this proverbial sword have been explored by manipulating the rate of migration within experimental populations1,3,4,5,6,8. However, few experiments have examined how the evolutionary ecology of fragmented populations depends on the pattern of migration5. Here, we show that the migration pattern affects both coexistence and evolution within a community of bacterial hosts (Escherichia coli) and viral pathogens (T4 coliphage) distributed across a large network of subpopulations. In particular, different patterns of migration select for distinct pathogen strategies, which we term 'rapacious' and 'prudent'. These strategies define a 'tragedy of the commons'9: rapacious phage displace prudent variants for shared host resources, but prudent phage are more productive when alone. We find that prudent phage dominate when migration is spatially restricted, while rapacious phage evolve under unrestricted migration. Thus, migration pattern alone can determine whether a de novo tragedy of the commons is resolved in favour of restraint.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Stochastic cellular automata predictions.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Ecological and evolutionary results for experimental metapopulations.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 3: Evolutionary stochastic cellular automata.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bonsall, M. B., French, D. R. & Hassell, M. P. Metapopulation structures affect persistence of predator–prey interactions. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 1075–1084 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Briggs, C. J. & Hoopes, M. F. Stabilizing effects in spatial parasitoid–host and predator–prey models: a review. Theor. Popul. Biol. 65, 299–315 (2004)
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Ellner, S. P. et al. Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community. Nature 412, 538–543 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Holyoak, M. & Lawler, S. P. Persistence of an extinction-prone predator–prey interaction through metapopulation dynamics. Ecology 77, 1867–1879 (1996)
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Holyoak, M. Habitat patch arrangement and metapopulation persistence of predators and prey. Am. Nat. 156, 378–389 (2000)
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Huffaker, C. B. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator–prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27, 343–383 (1958)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Johst, K. & Schops, K. Persistence and conservation of a consumer-resource metapopulation with local overexploitation of resources. Biol. Conserv. 109, 57–65 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Thrall, P. H., Godfree, R. & Burdon, J. J. Influence of spatial structure on pathogen colonization and extinction: a test using an experimental metapopulation. Plant Pathol. 52, 350–361 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Holyoak, M., Leibold, M. A. & Holt, R. D. Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005)
    Google Scholar
  11. Antonovics, J. in Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (eds Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O. E.) 471–488 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2004)
    Book Google Scholar
  12. Grenfell, B., Bjørnstad, O. N. & Kappey, J. Travelling waves and spatial hierarchies in measles epidemics. Nature 414, 716–723 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Keeling, M., Bjørnstad, O. N. & Grenfell, B. in Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution of Metapopulations (eds Hanski, I. & Gaggiotti, O. E.) 415–445 (Elsevier, Oxford, 2004)
    Book Google Scholar
  14. Abedon, S. T., Hyman, P. & Thomas, C. Experimental examination of bacteriophage latent-period evolution as a response to bacterial availability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 7499–7506 (2003)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  15. Bohannan, B. J. M. & Lenski, R. E. Linking genetic change to community evolution: insights from studies of bacteria and bacteriophage. Ecol. Lett. 3, 362–377 (2000)
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Lenski, R. E. & Levin, B. R. Constraints on the coevolution of bacteria and virulent phage: a model, some experiments, and predictions for natural communities. Am. Nat. 125, 585–602 (1985)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Paddison, P. et al. The roles of the bacteriophage T4 r genes in lysis inhibition and fine-structure genetics: A new perspective. Genetics 148, 1539–1550 (1998)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Keeling, M. Evolutionary trade-offs at two time-scales: competition versus persistence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 385–391 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Kreft, J. U. Biofilms promote altruism. Microbiology 150, 2751–2760 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Bergstrom, C. T., McElhany, P. & Real, L. A. Transmission bottlenecks as determinants of virulence in rapidly evolving pathogens. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 5095–5100 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  21. Boots, M. & Sasaki, A. 'Small worlds' and the evolution of virulence: infection occurs locally and at a distance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1933–1938 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Bull, J. J., Molineux, I. J. & Rice, W. R. Selection of benevolence in a host–parasite system. Evolution 45, 875–882 (1991)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Cooper, V. S. et al. Timing of transmission and the evolution of virulence of an insect virus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1161–1165 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Ebert, D. Virulence and local adaptation of a horizontally transmitted parasite. Science 265, 1084–1086 (1994)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Galvani, A. P. Epidemiology meets evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 132–139 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Herre, E. A. Population structure and the evolution of virulence in nematode parasites of fig wasps. Science 259, 1442–1445 (1993)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Lipsitch, M., Herre, E. A. & Nowak, M. A. Host population structure and the evolution of virulence: a 'law of diminishing returns'. Evolution 49, 743–748 (1995)
    PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Nowak, M. A. & May, R. M. Superinfection and the evolution of parasite virulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255, 81–89 (1994)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  29. O'Keefe, K. J. & Antonovics, J. Playing by different rules: The evolution of virulence in sterilizing pathogens. Am. Nat. 159, 597–605 (2002)
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Thrall, P. H. & Burdon, J. J. Evolution of virulence in a plant host–pathogen metapopulation. Science 299, 1735–1737 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Y. Dang for help in the laboratory and the BioTechnology Resource Center at the University of Minnesota for robot access. We thank S. Abedon, C. Bergstrom, J. Bull, J. Fletcher, K. Koelle, C. Lehman, B. Levin and D. Stephens for useful feedback on this project and manuscript. This work was partially supported by an NSF grant to C.N. and an NIH grant to A.M.D. Author Contributions B.K., A.M.D. and B.J.M.B. designed the experiments. B.K. and A.M.D. worked out the robotic protocols. B.K. programmed the robot, executed the experiments, and conducted the assays. B.K. and C.N. coded and analysed the empirically calibrated and evolutionary models. B.K., C.N. and A.M.D. conducted the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Box 351800, Washington, 98195-1800, USA
    Benjamin Kerr
  2. Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour, University of Minnesota, 100 Ecology, 1987 Buford Circle, St Paul, Minnesota, 55108, USA
    Claudia Neuhauser & Antony M. Dean
  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA
    Brendan J. M. Bohannan

Authors

  1. Benjamin Kerr
  2. Claudia Neuhauser
  3. Brendan J. M. Bohannan
  4. Antony M. Dean

Corresponding author

Correspondence toBenjamin Kerr.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Methods (download PDF )

This file contains experimental and theoretical methods and results, giving a detailed description of the experimental methods used, presentation of experimental data, and its statistical analysis as well as the details concerning the construction and analysis of the theoretical models. (PDF 600 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kerr, B., Neuhauser, C., Bohannan, B. et al. Local migration promotes competitive restraint in a host–pathogen 'tragedy of the commons'.Nature 442, 75–78 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04864

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Changing places

These T4 page and their E. coli hosts are the model for a typical 'victim-exploiter' interaction in a study of the role of migration patterns in a 'tragedy of the commons' competition for limited resources within fragmented communities. In this host-pathogen system, growing in 96-well microtitre plates, coexistence, stability and evolution within the separated communities depend critically on migration: restricted migration can promote restraint in the use of the common resource. In this experiment and in theory, highly connected social networks favour virulence.