Co-evolution of transcriptional and post-translational cell-cycle regulation (original) (raw)

Nature volume 443, pages 594–597 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

DNA microarray studies have shown that hundreds of genes are transcribed periodically during the mitotic cell cycle of humans1, budding yeast2,3, fission yeast4,5,6 and the plant Arabidopsis thaliana7. Here we show that despite the fact the protein complexes involved in this process are largely the same among all eukaryotes, their regulation has evolved considerably. Our comparative analysis of several large-scale data sets reveals that although the regulated subunits of each protein complex are expressed just before its time of action, the identity of the periodically expressed proteins differs significantly between organisms. Moreover, we show that these changes in transcriptional regulation have co-evolved with post-translational control independently in several lineages; loss or gain of cell-cycle-regulated transcription of specific genes is often mirrored by changes in phosphorylation of the proteins that they encode. Our results indicate that many different solutions have evolved for assembling the same molecular machines at the right time during the cell cycle, involving both transcriptional and post-translational layers that jointly control the dynamics of biological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitfield, M. L. et al. Identification of genes periodically expressed in the human cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1977–2000 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Cho, R. J. et al. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the mitotic cell cycle. Mol. Cell 2, 65–73 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Spellman, P. T. et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast S. cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3273–3297 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Rustici, G. et al. Periodic gene expression program of the fission yeast cell cycle. Nature Genet. 36, 809–817 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Peng, X. et al. Identification of cell cycle-regulated genes in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1026–1042 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Oliva, A. et al. The cell cycle-regulated genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. PLoS Biol. 3, e225 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Menges, M., Hennig, L., Gruissem, W. & Murray, J. A. H. Genome-wide gene expression in an Arabidopsis cell suspension. Plant Mol. Biol. 53, 423–442 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. de Lichtenberg, U. et al. Comparison of computational methods for the identification of cell cycle regulated genes. Bioinformatics 21, 1164–1171 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. de Lichtenberg, U., Jensen, L. J., Brunak, S. & Bork, P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 307, 724–727 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Marguerat, S. et al. The more the merrier: comparative analysis of microarray studies on cell cycle-regulated genes in fission yeast. Yeast 23, 261–277 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Ota, K., Goto, S. & Kanehisa, M. Comparative analysis of transcriptional regulation in eukaryotic cell cycles. Proc. Fourth Intl Workshop Bioinformatics Syst. Biol. 26–27 (2004)
  12. Sherlock, G. STARTing to recycle. Nature Genet. 36, 795–796 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Dyczkowski, J. & Vingron, M. Comparative analysis of cell cycle regulated genes in eukaryotes. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 16, 125–131 (2005)
    CAS Google Scholar
  14. Bell, S. P. & Dutta, A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 333–374 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Kearsey, S. E. & Cotterill, S. Enigmatic variations: divergent modes of regulating eukaryotic DNA replication. Mol. Cell 12, 1067–1075 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Nasmyth, K. & Haering, C. H. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 595–648 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Forsburg, S. L. & Nurse, P. Cell cycle regulation in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccaromyces pombe. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 7, 227–256 (1991)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Diffley, J. F. X. Regulation of early events in chromosome replication. Curr. Biol. 14, R778–R786 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Yanow, S. K., Lygerou, Z. & Nurse, P. Expression of Cdc18/Cdc6 and Cdt1 during G2 phase induces initiation of DNA replication. EMBO J. 20, 4648–4656 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Ekholm-Reed, S. et al. Deregulation of cyclin E in human cells interferes with prereplication complex assembly. J. Cell Biol. 165, 789–800 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Zhu, Y., Ishimi, Y., Tanudji, M. & Lees, E. Human CDK2 inhibition modifies the dynamics of chromatin-bound minichromosome maintenance complex and replication protein A. Cell Cycle 4, 1254–1263 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Diella, F. et al. Phospho.ELM: a database of experimentally verified phosphorylation sites in eukaryotic proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 79 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Ubersax, J. A. et al. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase cdk1. Nature 425, 859–864 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  24. Loog, M. & Morgan, D. O. Cyclin specificity in the phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. Nature 434, 104–108 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  25. Blom, N., Sicheritz-Ponten, T., Gupta, R., Gammeltoft, S. & Brunak, S. Prediction of post-translational glycosylation and phosphorylation of proteins from the amino acid sequence. Proteomics 4, 1633–1649 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V. & Lipman, D. J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278, 631–637 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. von Mering for assistance with detection of orthologues, and P. Nurse, E. Karsenti, J. Bähler, and members of the Bork and Brunak groups for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Danish National Research Foundation, the Danish Technical Research Council, and the European Commission FP6 Programme (grants DIAMONDS and BioSapiens).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Lars Juhl Jensen, Thomas Skøt Jensen and Ulrik de Lichtenberg: *These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, D-69117, Heidelberg, Germany
    Lars Juhl Jensen & Peer Bork
  2. Center for Biological Sequence Analysis, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800, Lyngby, Denmark
    Thomas Skøt Jensen, Ulrik de Lichtenberg & Søren Brunak
  3. Max-Delbrück-Centre for Molecular Medicine, D-13092, Berlin, Germany
    Peer Bork

Authors

  1. Lars Juhl Jensen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Thomas Skøt Jensen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Ulrik de Lichtenberg
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Søren Brunak
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Peer Bork
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toPeer Bork.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Results. This file provides a detailed material and methods section as well as additional results. In particular, the results for numerous protein complexes are described and compared to current knowledge. (PDF 1182 kb)

Supplementary Notes

Archive of the supplementary web site. This file contains a complete copy of all information on the supplementary web site (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/cellcycle/). To use, unpack the zip file and open the file README.html in a web browser. (ZIP 1203 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, L., Jensen, T., de Lichtenberg, U. et al. Co-evolution of transcriptional and post-translational cell-cycle regulation.Nature 443, 594–597 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05186

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Time for change

Hundreds of genes are transcribed periodically during the cell cycle. The protein complexes involved are much the same among all eukaryotes, but comparison of large-scale microarray data sets from humans, yeasts and plants shows that many different solutions have evolved for assembling the same molecular machinery at the right point in the cell cycle. Transcriptional and post-translational controls evolve in tandem and change is surprisingly rapid in evolutionary terms — over periods of just a few hundred million years. This implies that even within vertebrates, regulatory systems can differ considerably.