Control of cell cycle transcription during G1 and S phases (original) (raw)

• Morgan, D. O. in The cell cycle: principles of control. (ed. Lawrence, E.) 157–173 (New Science Press, 2007).
  Google Scholar
• Massague, J. G1 cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature 432, 298–306 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R. A. The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control. Cell 81, 323–330 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Henley, S. A. & Dick, F. A. The retinoblastoma family of proteins and their regulatory functions in the mammalian cell division cycle. Cell Div. 7, 10 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chinnam, M. & Goodrich, D. W. RB1, development, and cancer. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 94, 129–169 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Helin, K. Regulation of cell proliferation by the E2F transcription factors. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 8, 28–35 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Umen, J. G. & Goodenough, U. W. Control of cell division by a retinoblastoma protein homolog in Chlamydomonas. Genes Dev. 15, 1652–1661 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cross, F. R., Buchler, N. E. & Skotheim, J. M. Evolution of networks and sequences in eukaryotic cell cycle control. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 366, 3532–3544 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel, S. & Dyson, N. J. Conserved functions of the pRB and E2F families. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 713–724 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cooper, K. Rb, whi it's not just for metazoans anymore. Oncogene 25, 5228–5232 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• de Bruin, R. A. & Wittenberg, C. All eukaryotes: before turning off G1–S transcription, please check your DNA. Cell Cycle 8, 214–217 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bahler, J. Cell-cycle control of gene expression in budding and fission yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 69–94 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fukuoka, M. et al. Identification of preferentially reactivated genes during early G1 phase using nascent mRNA as an index of transcriptional activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430, 1005–1010 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wittenberg, C. & Reed, S. I. Cell cycle-dependent transcription in yeast: promoters, transcription factors, and transcriptomes. Oncogene 24, 2746–2755 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Spellman, P. T. et al. Comprehensive identification of cell cycle-regulated genes of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by microarray hybridization. Mol. Biol. Cell 9, 3273–3297 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Whitfield, M. L. et al. Identification of genes periodically expressed in the human cell cycle and their expression in tumors. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1977–2000 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Skaar, J. R. & Pagano, M. Control of cell growth by the SCF and APC/C ubiquitin ligases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 816–824 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bloom, J. & Cross, F. R. Multiple levels of cyclin specificity in cell-cycle control. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 149–160 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 208–219 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cimprich, K. A. & Cortez, D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 616–627 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. P. & Bartek, J. The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature 461, 1071–1078 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nakayama, K. I. & Nakayama, K. Ubiquitin ligases: cell-cycle control and cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 6, 369–381 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chen, H. Z., Tsai, S. Y. & Leone, G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit from cell cycle control. Nature Rev. Cancer 9, 785–797 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. G. & Schneider-Broussard, R. Role of E2F in cell cycle control and cancer. Front Biosci. 3, d447–d448 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Asano, M., Nevins, J. R. & Wharton, R. P. Ectopic E2F expression induces S phase and apoptosis in Drosophilai maginal discs. Genes Dev. 10, 1422–1432 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dyson, N. The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins. Genes Dev. 12, 2245–2262 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lukas, J., Petersen, B. O., Holm, K., Bartek, J. & Helin, K. Deregulated expression of E2F family members induces S-phase entry and overcomes p16INK4A-mediated growth suppression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1047–1057 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Malumbres, M. & Barbacid, M. To cycle or not to cycle: a critical decision in cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 1, 222–231 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chong, J. L. et al. E2f1–3 switch from activators in progenitor cells to repressors in differentiating cells. Nature 462, 930–934 (2009). Establishes the in vivo relevance of E2F1, E2F2 and E2F3, indicating an important role for their repressor function in addition to their well-established function in transcriptional activation.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Weijts, B. G. et al. E2F7 and E2F8 promote angiogenesis through transcriptional activation of VEGFA in cooperation with HIF1. EMBO J. 31, 3871–3884 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lee, B. K., Bhinge, A. A. & Iyer, V. R. Wide-ranging functions of E2F4 in transcriptional activation and repression revealed by genome-wide analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 3558–3573 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Helin, K., Harlow, E. & Fattaey, A. Inhibition of E2F-1 transactivation by direct binding of the retinoblastoma protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 6501–6508 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hatakeyama, M. & Weinberg, R. A. The role of RB in cell cycle control. Prog. Cell Cycle Res. 1, 9–19 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wirt, S. E. & Sage, J. p107 in the public eye: an Rb understudy and more. Cell Div. 5, 9 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ginsberg, D. et al. E2F-4, a new member of the E2F transcription factor family, interacts with p107. Genes Dev. 8, 2665–2679 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Grana, X., Garriga, J. & Mayol, X. Role of the retinoblastoma protein family, pRB, p107 and p130 in the negative control of cell growth. Oncogene 17, 3365–3383 (1998).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dimova, D. K. & Dyson, N. J. The E2F transcriptional network: old acquaintances with new faces. Oncogene 24, 2810–2826 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hitchens, M. R. & Robbins, P. D. The role of the transcription factor DP in apoptosis. Apoptosis 8, 461–468 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, S. et al. E2F4 and E2F5 play an essential role in pocket protein-mediated G1 control. Mol. Cell 6, 729–735 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Y., Rayman, J. B. & Dynlacht, B. D. Analysis of promoter binding by the E2F and pRB families in vivo: distinct E2F proteins mediate activation and repression. Genes Dev. 14, 804–816 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Balciunaite, E. et al. Pocket protein complexes are recruited to distinct targets in quiescent and proliferating cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8166–8178 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Beijersbergen, R. L. et al. E2F-4, a new member of the E2F gene family, has oncogenic activity and associates with p107 in vivo. Genes Dev. 8, 2680–2690 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaubatz, S., Lees, J. A., Lindeman, G. J. & Livingston, D. M. E2F4 is exported from the nucleus in a CRM1-dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1384–1392 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, D. et al. Division and apoptosis of E2f-deficient retinal progenitors. Nature 462, 925–929 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Litovchick, L. et al. Evolutionarily conserved multisubunit RBL2/p130 and E2F4 protein complex represses human cell cycle-dependent genes in quiescence. Mol. Cell 26, 539–551 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chicas, A. et al. Dissecting the unique role of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor during cellular senescence. Cancer Cell 17, 376–387 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• de Bruin, R. A. et al. Cln3 activates G1-Specific transcription via phosphorylation of the SBF bound repressor Whi5. Cell 117, 887–898 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Costanzo, M. et al. CDK activity antagonizes Whi5, an inhibitor of G1/S transcription in yeast. Cell 117, 899–913 (2004). Establishes, together with reference 47, the role of Whi5 in G1 cyclin–Cdk-mediated activation of G1–S transcription in budding yeast.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• de Bruin, R. A. et al. Constraining G1-Specific transcription to late G1 phase: the MBF-associated corepressor Nrm1 acts via negative feedback. Mol. Cell 23, 483–496 (2006). Shows that the transcriptional co-repressor Nrm1 is involved in a negative feedback mechanism to turn off G1–S transcription in budding and fission yeast.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wijnen, H., Landman, A. & Futcher, B. The G1 cyclin Cln3 promotes cell cycle entry via the transcription factor Swi6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 4402–4418 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ferrezuelo, F., Colomina, N., Futcher, B. & Aldea, M. The transcriptional network activated by Cln3 cyclin at the G1-to-S transition of the yeast cell cycle. Genome Biol. 11, R67 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bean, J. M., Siggia, E. D. & Cross, F. R. High functional overlap between MluI cell-cycle box binding factor and Swi4/6 cell-cycle box binding factor in the G1/S transcriptional program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 171, 49–61 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kosugi, S., Hasebe, M., Tomita, M. & Yanagawa, H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10171–10176 (2009).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Skotheim, J. M., Di Talia, S., Siggia, E. D. & Cross, F. R. Positive feedback of G1 cyclins ensures coherent cell cycle entry. Nature 454, 291–296 (2008). Establishes the positive feedback mechanism required for robust activation of G1–S transcription.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Doncic, A., Falleur-Fettig, M. & Skotheim, J. M. Distinct interactions select and maintain a specific cell fate. Mol. Cell 43, 528–539 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eser, U., Falleur-Fettig, M., Johnson, A. & Skotheim, J. M. Commitment to a cellular transition precedes genome-wide transcriptional change. Mol. Cell 43, 515–527 (2011). Identifies differential timing for the expression of G1–S genes in yeast and humans and shows the importance of feedback first regulation.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bracken, A. P., Ciro, M., Cocito, A. & Helin, K. E2F target genes: unraveling the biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 29, 409–417 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yung, Y., Walker, J. L., Roberts, J. M. & Assoian, R. K. A Skp2 autoinduction loop and restriction point control. J. Cell Biol. 178, 741–747 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. G., Ohtani, K. & Nevins, J. R. Autoregulatory control of E2F1 expression in response to positive and negative regulators of cell cycle progression. Genes Dev. 8, 1514–1525 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Foster, D. A., Yellen, P., Xu, L. & Saqcena, M. Regulation of G1 cell cycle progression: distinguishing the restriction point from a nutrient-sensing cell growth checkpoint(s). Genes Cancer 1, 1124–1131 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Martinsson, H. S., Starborg, M., Erlandsson, F. & Zetterberg, A. Single cell analysis of G1 check points-the relationship between the restriction point and phosphorylation of pRb. Exp. Cell Res. 305, 383–391 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hitomi, M. et al. p27Kip1 and cyclin dependent kinase 2 regulate passage through the restriction point. Cell Cycle 5, 2281–2289 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schwob, E., Bohm, T., Mendenhall, M. D. & Nasmyth, K. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40_SIC1_ controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell 79, 233–244 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nash, P. et al. Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 414, 514–521 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Koivomagi, M. et al. Cascades of multisite phosphorylation control Sic1 destruction at the onset of S phase. Nature 480, 128–131 (2012). Establishes the role of semi-processive multi-site phosphorylation events in the degradation of the Cdk inhibitor Sic1.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Masumoto, H., Muramatsu, S., Kamimura, Y. & Araki, H. S-Cdk-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 essential for chromosomal DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 415, 651–655 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zegerman, P. & Diffley, J. F. Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 by cyclin-dependent kinases promotes DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 445, 281–285 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kang, Y. H., Galal, W. C., Farina, A., Tappin, I. & Hurwitz, J. Properties of the human Cdc45/Mcm2-7/GINS helicase complex and its action with DNA polymerase epsilon in rolling circle DNA synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6042–6047 (2012).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wilmes, G. M. et al. Interaction of the S-phase cyclin Clb5 with an 'RXL' docking sequence in the initiator protein Orc6 provides an origin-localized replication control switch. Genes Dev. 18, 981–991 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Koivomagi, M. et al. Dynamics of Cdk1 substrate specificity during the cell cycle. Mol. Cell 42, 610–623 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Loog, M. & Morgan, D. O. Cyclin specificity in the phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. Nature 434, 104–108 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stern, B. & Nurse, P. A quantitative model for the cdc2 control of S phase and mitosis in fission yeast. Trends Genet. 12, 345–350 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Amon, A., Tyers, M., Futcher, B. & Nasmyth, K. Mechanisms that help the yeast cell cycle clock tick: G2 cyclins transcriptionally activate G2 cyclins and repress G1 cyclins. Cell 74, 993–1007 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• de Bruin, R. A., Kalashnikova, T. I. & Wittenberg, C. Stb1 collaborates with other regulators to modulate the G1-Specific transcriptional circuit. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 6919–6928 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Siegmund, R. F. & Nasmyth, K. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Start-specific transcription factor Swi4 interacts through the ankyrin repeats with the mitotic Clb2/Cdc28 kinase and through its conserved carboxy terminus with Swi6. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 2647–2655 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Koch, C., Schleiffer, A., Ammerer, G. & Nasmyth, K. Switching transcription on and off during the yeast cell cycle: Cln/Cdc28 kinases activate bound transcription factor SBF (Swi4/Swi6) at start, whereas Clb/Cdc28 kinases displace it from the promoter in G2. Genes Dev. 10, 129–141 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moll, T. et al. Transcription factors important for starting the cell cycle in yeast. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 340, 351–360 (1993).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Xu, M., Sheppard, K. A., Peng, C. Y., Yee, A. S. & Piwnica-Worms, H. Cyclin A/CDK2 binds directly to E2F-1 and inhibits the DNA-binding activity of E2F-1/DP-1 by phosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8420–8431 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dynlacht, B. D., Flores, O., Lees, J. A. & Harlow, E. Differential regulation of E2F transactivation by cyclin/cdk2 complexes. Genes Dev. 8, 1772–1786 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Krek, W. et al. Negative regulation of the growth-promoting transcription factor E2F-1 by a stably bound cyclin A-dependent protein kinase. Cell 78, 161–172 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carrano, A. C., Eytan, E., Hershko, A. & Pagano, M. SKP2 is required for ubiquitin-mediated degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 193–199 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Montagnoli, A. et al. Ubiquitination of p27 is regulated by Cdk-dependent phosphorylation and trimeric complex formation. Genes Dev. 13, 1181–1189 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Marti, A., Wirbelauer, C., Scheffner, M. & Krek, W. Interaction between ubiquitin-protein ligase SCFSKP2 and E2F-1 underlies the regulation of E2F-1 degradation. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 14–19 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Campanero, M. R. & Flemington, E. K. Regulation of E2F through ubiquitin–proteasome-dependent degradation: stabilization by the pRB tumor suppressor protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 2221–2226 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hateboer, G., Kerkhoven, R. M., Shvarts, A., Bernards, R. & Beijersbergen, R. L. Degradation of E2F by the ubiquitin–proteasome pathway: regulation by retinoblastoma family proteins and adenovirus transforming proteins. Genes Dev. 10, 2960–2970 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Aligianni, S. et al. The fission yeast homeodomain protein Yox1p binds to MBF and confines MBF-dependent cell-cycle transcription to G1–S via negative feedback. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000626 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ostapenko, D. & Solomon, M. J. Anaphase promoting complex-dependent degradation of transcriptional repressors Nrm1 and Yhp1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 2175–2184 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, J. et al. Synergistic function of E2F7 and E2F8 is essential for cell survival and embryonic development. Dev. Cell 14, 62–75 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Westendorp, B. et al. E2F7 represses a network of oscillating cell cycle genes to control S-phase progression. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 3511–3523 (2012). Establishes a role for E2F7 in the repression of G1–S transcription during S phase in mammalian cells.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. E., Salih, M. & Tuana, B. S. Activating E2Fs mediate transcriptional regulation of human E2F6 repressor. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 290, C189–C199 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moon, N. S. & Dyson, N. E2F7 and E2F8 keep the E2F family in balance. Dev. Cell 14, 1–3 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cartwright, P., Muller, H., Wagener, C., Holm, K. & Helin, K. E2F-6: a novel member of the E2F family is an inhibitor of E2F-dependent transcription. Oncogene 17, 611–623 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• de Bruin, A. et al. Identification and characterization of E2F7, a novel mammalian E2F family member capable of blocking cellular proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 42041–42049 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Di Stefano, L., Jensen, M. R. & Helin, K. E2F7, a novel E2F featuring DP-independent repression of a subset of E2F-regulated genes. EMBO J. 22, 6289–6298 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Logan, N. et al. E2F-8: an E2F family member with a similar organization of DNA-binding domains to E2F-7. Oncogene 24, 5000–5004 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Trimarchi, J. M. et al. E2F-6, a member of the E2F family that can behave as a transcriptional repressor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2850–2855 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lammens, T., Li, J., Leone, G. & De Veylder, L. Atypical E2Fs: new players in the E2F transcription factor family. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 111–118 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bertoli, C., Klier, S., McGowan, C., Wittenberg, C. & de Bruin, R. A. M. Chk1 inhibits E2F6 repressor function in response to replication stress to maintain cell cycle transcription. Curr. Biol. (in the press).
• Giangrande, P. H. et al. A role for E2F6 in distinguishing G1/S- and G2/M-specific transcription. Genes Dev. 18, 2941–2951 (2004). Proposes that E2F6 could be involved in a negative feedback loop to repress G1–S transcription when cells progress to S phase.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Powell, B. L. et al. Leukapheresis induced changes in cell cycle distribution and nucleoside transporters in patients with untreated acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 5, 1037–1042 (1991).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bastos de Oliveira, F. M., Harris, M. R., Brazauskas, P., de Bruin, R. A. & Smolka, M. B. Linking DNA replication checkpoint to MBF cell-cycle transcription reveals a distinct class of G1/S genes. EMBO J. 31, 1798–1810 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Travesa, A. et al. DNA replication stress differentially regulates G1/S genes via Rad53-dependent inactivation of Nrm1. EMBO J. 31, 1811–1822 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Smolka, M. B., Bastos de Oliveira, F. M., Harris, M. R. & de Bruin, R. A. The checkpoint transcriptional response: Make sure to turn it off once you are satisfied. Cell Cycle 11, 3166–3174 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jensen, L. J., Jensen, T. S., de Lichtenberg, U., Brunak, S. & Bork, P. Co-evolution of transcriptional and post-translational cell-cycle regulation. Nature 443, 594–597 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Trojer, P. et al. L3MBTL2 protein acts in concert with PcG protein-mediated monoubiquitination of H2A to establish a repressive chromatin structure. Mol. Cell 42, 438–450 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xu, X. et al. A comprehensive ChIP–chip analysis of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F6 in normal and tumor cells reveals interchangeable roles of E2F family members. Genome Res. 17, 1550–1561 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zegerman, P. & Diffley, J. F. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1077–1088 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chu, Z. et al. Modulation of cell cycle-specific gene expressions at the onset of S phase arrest contributes to the robust DNA replication checkpoint response in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 1756–1767 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gomez-Escoda, B. et al. Yox1 links MBF-dependent transcription to completion of DNA synthesis. EMBO Rep. 12, 84–89 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Caetano, C., Klier, S. & de Bruin, R. A. Phosphorylation of the MBF repressor Yox1p by the DNA replication checkpoint keeps the G1/S cell-cycle transcriptional program active. _PLoS ONE_6, e17211 (2011).
• de Bruin, R. A. et al. DNA replication checkpoint promotes G1–S transcription by inactivating the MBF repressor Nrm1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11230–11235 (2008). Establishes, together with reference 98, the mechanism of how the DNA replication checkpoint co-opts the cell cycle transcriptional programme to respond to replication stress in fission yeast and in human cells.
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dutta, C. et al. The DNA replication checkpoint directly regulates MBF-dependent G1/S transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5977–5985 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ivanova, T., Gomez-Escoda, B., Hidalgo, E. & Ayte, J. G1/S transcription and the DNA synthesis checkpoint: common regulatory mechanisms. Cell Cycle 10, 912–915 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Purtill, F. S. et al. A homeodomain transcription factor regulates the DNA replication checkpoint in yeast. Cell Cycle 10, 664–670 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lin, W. C., Lin, F. T. & Nevins, J. R. Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage, mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation. Genes Dev. 15, 1833–1844 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pediconi, N. et al. Differential regulation of E2F1 apoptotic target genes in response to DNA damage. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 552–558 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stevens, C. & La Thangue, N. B. E2F and cell cycle control: a double-edged sword. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 412, 157–169 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stevens, C., Smith, L. & La Thangue, N. B. Chk2 activates E2F-1 in response to DNA damage. Nature Cell Biol. 5, 401–409 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Urist, M. Tanaka, T., Poyurovsky, M. V. & Prives, C. p73 induction after DNA damage is regulated by checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2. Genes Dev. 18, 3041–3054 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, B., Liu, K., Lin, F. T. & Lin, W. C. A role for 14-3-3 tau in E2F1 stabilization and DNA damage-induced apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 54140–54152 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. S., Postigo, A. A. & Dean, D. C. Active transcriptional repression by the Rb-E2F complex mediates G1 arrest triggered by p16INK4a, TGFβ, and contact inhibition. Cell 97, 53–61 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hurford, R. K. Jr., Cobrinik, D., Lee, M. H. & Dyson, N. pRB and p107/p130 are required for the regulated expression of different sets of E2F responsive genes. Genes Dev. 11, 1447–1463 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vairo, G., Livingston, D. M. & Ginsberg, D. Functional interaction between E2F-4 and p130: evidence for distinct mechanisms underlying growth suppression by different retinoblastoma protein family members. Genes Dev. 9, 869–881 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moberg, K., Starz, M. A. & Lees, J. A. E2F-4 switches from p130 to p107 and pRB in response to cell cycle reentry. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 1436–1449 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Deschenes, C., Alvarez, L., Lizotte, M. E., Vezina, A. & Rivard, N. The nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of E2F4 is involved in the regulation of human intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 199, 262–273 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hijmans, E. M., Voorhoeve, P. M., Beijersbergen, R. L., van 't Veer, L. J. & Bernards, R. E2F-5, a new E2F family member that interacts with p130 in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3082–3089 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, C. R., Kang, Y., Siegel, P. M. & Massague, J. E2F4/5 and p107 as Smad cofactors linking the TGFβ receptor to c-myc repression. Cell 110, 19–32 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. et al. Characterization of E2F8, a novel E2F-like cell-cycle regulated repressor of E2F-activated transcription. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 5458–5470 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maiti, B. et al. Cloning and characterization of mouse E2F8, a novel mammalian E2F family member capable of blocking cellular proliferation. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 18211–18220 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S. et al. SKP2 associates with p130 and accelerates p130 ubiquitylation and degradation in human cells. Oncogene 22, 2443–2451 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartek, J. & Lukas, J. Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer. Cancer Cell 3, 421–429 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sorensen, C. S. & Syljuasen, R. G. Safeguarding genome integrity: the checkpoint kinases ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 restrain CDK activity during normal DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 477–486 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartek, J., Lukas, C. & Lukas, J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 792–804 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Vousden, K. H. & Prives, C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell 137, 413–431 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Coller, H. A., Sang, L. & Roberts, J. M. A new description of cellular quiescence. PLoS Biol. 4, e83 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sang, L., Coller, H. A. & Roberts, J. M. HES1 regulates the reversibility of cellular quiescence. Science 321, 1095–1100 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bhaduri, S. & Pryciak, P. M. Cyclin-specific docking motifs promote phosphorylation of yeast signaling proteins by G1/S Cdk complexes. Curr. Biol. 21, 1615–1623 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar