Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU (original) (raw)

Nature volume 449, pages 238–242 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Stem cells are proposed to segregate chromosomes asymmetrically during self-renewing divisions so that older (‘immortal’) DNA strands are retained in daughter stem cells whereas newly synthesized strands segregate to differentiating cells1,2,3,4,5,6. Stem cells are also proposed to retain DNA labels, such as 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU), either because they segregate chromosomes asymmetrically or because they divide slowly5,7,8,9. However, the purity of stem cells among BrdU-label-retaining cells has not been documented in any tissue, and the ‘immortal strand hypothesis’ has not been tested in a system with definitive stem cell markers. Here we tested these hypotheses in haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which can be highly purified using well characterized markers. We administered BrdU to newborn mice, mice treated with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and normal adult mice for 4 to 10 days, followed by 70 days without BrdU. In each case, less than 6% of HSCs retained BrdU and less than 0.5% of all BrdU-retaining haematopoietic cells were HSCs, revealing that BrdU has poor specificity and poor sensitivity as an HSC marker. Sequential administration of 5-chloro-2-deoxyuridine and 5-iodo-2-deoxyuridine indicated that all HSCs segregate their chromosomes randomly. Division of individual HSCs in culture revealed no asymmetric segregation of the label. Thus, HSCs cannot be identified on the basis of BrdU-label retention and do not retain older DNA strands during division, indicating that these are not general properties of stem cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Potten, C. S., Hume, W. J., Reid, P. & Cairns, J. The segregation of DNA in epithelial stem cells. Cell 15, 899–906 (1978)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Cairns, J. Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer. Nature 255, 197–200 (1975)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Karpowicz, P. et al. Support for the immortal strand hypothesis: neural stem cells partition DNA asymmetrically in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 170, 721–732 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Smith, G. H. Label-retaining epithelial cells in mouse mammary gland divide asymmetrically and retain their template DNA strands. Development 132, 681–687 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Shinin, V., Gayraud-Morel, B., Gomes, D. & Tajbakhsh, S. Asymmetric division and cosegregation of template DNA strands in adult muscle satellite cells. Nature Cell Biol. 8, 677–687 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Conboy, M. J., Karasov, A. O. & Rando, T. A. High incidence of non-random template strand segregation and asymmetric fate determination in dividing stem cells and their progeny. PLoS Biol. 5, e102 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Tumbar, T. et al. Defining the epithelial stem cell niche in skin. Science 303, 359–363 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Cotsarelis, G., Sun, T. T. & Lavker, R. M. Label-retaining cells reside in the bulge area of pilosebaceous unit: implications for follicular stem cells, hair cycle, and skin carcinogenesis. Cell 61, 1329–1337 (1990)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Zhang, J. et al. Identification of the haematopoietic stem cell niche and control of the niche size. Nature 425, 836–841 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Armakolas, A. & Klar, A. J. Cell type regulates selective segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science 311, 1146–1149 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Arai, F. et al. Tie2/angiopoietin-1 signaling regulates hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in the bone marrow niche. Cell 118, 149–161 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Welm, B. E. et al. Sca-1+ cells in the mouse mammary gland represent an enriched progenitor cell population. Dev. Biol. 245, 42–56 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Potten, C. S., Owen, G. & Booth, D. Intestinal stem cells protect their genome by selective segregation of template DNA strands. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2381–2388 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Urbanek, K. et al. Stem cell niches in the adult mouse heart. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9226–9231 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Cheshier, S. H., Morrison, S. J., Liao, X. & Weissman, I. L. In vivo proliferation and cell cycle kinetics of long-term self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 3120–3125 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Takano, H., Ema, H., Sudo, K. & Nakauchi, H. Asymmetric division and lineage commitment at the level of hematopoietic stem cells: inference from differentiation in daughter cell and granddaughter cell pairs. J. Exp. Med. 199, 295–302 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Kiel, M. J., Yilmaz, O. H., Iwashita, T., Terhorst, C. & Morrison, S. J. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell 121, 1109–1121 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Bowie, M. B. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells proliferate until after birth and show a reversible phase-specific engraftment defect. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 2808–2816 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Morrison, S. J., Wright, D. & Weissman, I. L. Cyclophosphamide/granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces hematopoietic stem cells to proliferate prior to mobilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1908–1913 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Taylor, G., Lehrer, M. S., Jensen, P. J., Sun, T. T. & Lavker, R. M. Involvement of follicular stem cells in forming not only the follicle but also the epidermis. Cell 102, 451–461 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Morrison, S. J. et al. Culture in reduced levels of oxygen promotes clonogenic sympathoadrenal differentiation by isolated neural crest stem cells. J. Neurosci. 20, 7370–7376 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Bonhoeffer, S., Mohri, H., Ho, D. & Perelson, A. S. Quantification of cell turnover kinetics using 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine. J Immunol. 164, 5049–5054 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the National Institute on Aging (NIH), and the US Army Research Laboratory/Office. Flow cytometry was partially supported by the UM-Comprehensive Cancer Centre and the UM-Multipurpose Arthritis Centre. Antibody production was partially supported by the Rheumatic Core Disease Centre. M.J.K. was supported by a University of Michigan Cancer Biology Training Grant. The authors thank D. Adams and M. White for flow cytometry and E. Smith (Hybridoma Core Facility) for antibody production.

Author Contributions M.J.K. performed all experiments and interpreted results. S.H. assisted in the design and interpretation of many experiments and helped to perform some experiments. R.A., S.N.G. and T.L.J. generated the mathematical model of BrdU retention over time (Fig. 3a). M.T. and J.A.K. developed the protocol for double-labelling cells with CldU and IdU. S.J.M. participated in the design and interpretation of experiments, and wrote the paper with M.J.K. and S.H.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Life Sciences Institute, and Centre for Stem Cell Biology,
    Mark J. Kiel, Shenghui He & Sean J. Morrison
  2. Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2216, USA,
    Rina Ashkenazi, Sara N. Gentry & Trachette L. Jackson
  3. Division of Endocrinology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA,
    Monica Teta & Jake A. Kushner

Authors

  1. Mark J. Kiel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Shenghui He
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Rina Ashkenazi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Sara N. Gentry
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Monica Teta
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Jake A. Kushner
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Trachette L. Jackson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Sean J. Morrison
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSean J. Morrison.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiel, M., He, S., Ashkenazi, R. et al. Haematopoietic stem cells do not asymmetrically segregate chromosomes or retain BrdU.Nature 449, 238–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06115

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

The not-so-immortal strand

In 1975, John Cairns proposed the 'immortal strand' hypothesis as a mechanism by which adult stem cells might minimize accumulation of mutations. This is achieved by selectively retaining chromosomes containing 'old' DNA as shown by the analysis of the DNA strands that incorporate radioactive label or a nucleotide analogue such as bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). A new contribution to this ongoing debate is published in this issue. Kiel et al. show that the immortal strand model is not a general property of stem cells since it does not apply to haematopoietic stem cells. These cells cannot be identified on the basis of BrdU label retention, and do not retain older DNA during division.