Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast (original) (raw)

• Letter
• Published: 25 January 2009
• Wu Wei1 na1,
• Julien Gagneur1,
• Fabiana Perocchi1,
• Sandra Clauder-Münster1,
• Jurgi Camblong2,
• Elisa Guffanti3,
• Françoise Stutz3,
• Wolfgang Huber4 &
• …
• Lars M. Steinmetz1

Nature volume 457, pages 1033–1037 (2009)Cite this article

• 12k Accesses
• 27 Altmetric
• Metrics details

Abstract

Genome-wide pervasive transcription has been reported in many eukaryotic organisms1,2,3,4,5,6,7, revealing a highly interleaved transcriptome organization that involves hundreds of previously unknown non-coding RNAs8. These recently identified transcripts either exist stably in cells (stable unannotated transcripts, SUTs) or are rapidly degraded by the RNA surveillance pathway (cryptic unstable transcripts, CUTs). One characteristic of pervasive transcription is the extensive overlap of SUTs and CUTs with previously annotated features, which prompts questions regarding how these transcripts are generated, and whether they exert function9. Single-gene studies have shown that transcription of SUTs and CUTs can be functional, through mechanisms involving the generated RNAs10,11 or their generation itself12,13,14. So far, a complete transcriptome architecture including SUTs and CUTs has not been described in any organism. Knowledge about the position and genome-wide arrangement of these transcripts will be instrumental in understanding their function8,15. Here we provide a comprehensive analysis of these transcripts in the context of multiple conditions, a mutant of the exosome machinery and different strain backgrounds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We show that both SUTs and CUTs display distinct patterns of distribution at specific locations. Most of the newly identified transcripts initiate from nucleosome-free regions (NFRs) associated with the promoters of other transcripts (mostly protein-coding genes), or from NFRs at the 3′ ends of protein-coding genes. Likewise, about half of all coding transcripts initiate from NFRs associated with promoters of other transcripts. These data change our view of how a genome is transcribed, indicating that bidirectionality is an inherent feature of promoters. Such an arrangement of divergent and overlapping transcripts may provide a mechanism for local spreading of regulatory signals—that is, coupling the transcriptional regulation of neighbouring genes by means of transcriptional interference or histone modification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Learn about institutional subscriptions
• Read our FAQs
• Contact customer support

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Primary accessions

ArrayExpress

Data deposits

Raw data are available from ArrayExpress (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress) under accession number E-TABM-590.

References

1. Bertone, P. et al. Global identification of human transcribed sequences with genome tiling arrays. Science 306, 2242–2246 (2004)
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
2. Carninci, P. et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 309, 1559–1563 (2005)
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
3. David, L. et al. A high-resolution map of transcription in the yeast genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5320–5325 (2006)
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
4. Dutrow, N. et al. Dynamic transcriptome of Schizosaccharomyces pombe shown by RNA–DNA hybrid mapping. Nature Genet. 40, 977–986 (2008)
   Article CAS Google Scholar
5. Li, L. et al. Genome-wide transcription analyses in rice using tiling microarrays. Nature Genet. 38, 124–129 (2006)
   Article CAS Google Scholar
6. Stolc, V. et al. A gene expression map for the euchromatic genome of Drosophila melanogaster . Science 306, 655–660 (2004)
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
7. Wilhelm, B. T. et al. Dynamic repertoire of a eukaryotic transcriptome surveyed at single-nucleotide resolution. Nature 453, 1239–1243 (2008)
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
8. Kapranov, P., Willingham, A. T. & Gingeras, T. R. Genome-wide transcription and the implications for genomic organization. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 413–423 (2007)
   Article CAS Google Scholar
9. Struhl, K. Transcriptional noise and the fidelity of initiation by RNA polymerase II. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 103–105 (2007)
   Article CAS Google Scholar
10. Berretta, J., Pinskaya, M. & Morillon, A. A cryptic unstable transcript mediates transcriptional trans-silencing of the Ty1 retrotransposon in S. cerevisiae . Genes Dev. 22, 615–626 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
11. Camblong, J. et al. Antisense RNA stabilization induces transcriptional gene silencing via histone deacetylation in S. cerevisiae . Cell 131, 706–717 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Bird, A. J., Gordon, M., Eide, D. J. & Winge, D. R. Repression of ADH1 and ADH3 during zinc deficiency by Zap1-induced intergenic RNA transcripts. EMBO J. 25, 5726–5734 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
13. Hongay, C. F., Grisafi, P. L., Galitski, T. & Fink, G. R. Antisense transcription controls cell fate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Cell 127, 735–745 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. Martens, J. A., Laprade, L. & Winston, F. Intergenic transcription is required to repress the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SER3 gene. Nature 429, 571–574 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
15. Birney, E. et al. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447, 799–816 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
16. Huber, W., Toedling, J. & Steinmetz, L. M. Transcript mapping with high-density oligonucleotide tiling arrays. Bioinformatics 22, 1963–1970 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
17. Davis, C. A. & Ares, M. Accumulation of unstable promoter-associated transcripts upon loss of the nuclear exosome subunit Rrp6p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3262–3267 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
18. Wyers, F. et al. Cryptic pol II transcripts are degraded by a nuclear quality control pathway involving a new poly(A) polymerase. Cell 121, 725–737 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Nagalakshmi, U. et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320, 1344–1349 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
20. Lee, W. et al. A high-resolution atlas of nucleosome occupancy in yeast. Nature Genet. 39, 1235–1244 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
21. Shivaswamy, S. et al. Dynamic remodeling of individual nucleosomes across a eukaryotic genome in response to transcriptional perturbation. PLoS Biol. 6, e65 (2008)
    Article Google Scholar
22. Mavrich, T. N. et al. A barrier nucleosome model for statistical positioning of nucleosomes throughout the yeast genome. Genome Res. 18, 1073–1083 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Whitehouse, I., Rando, O. J., Delrow, J. & Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031–1035 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
24. Yuan, G. C. et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae . Science 309, 626–630 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
25. Albert, I. et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446, 572–576 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
26. Hermsen, R., ten Wolde, P. R. & Teichmann, S. Chance and necessity in chromosomal gene distributions. Trends Genet. 24, 216–219 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
27. Uhler, J. P., Hertel, C. & Svejstrup, J. Q. A role for noncoding transcription in activation of the yeast PHO5 gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 8011–8016 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
28. Wei, W. et al. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12825–12830 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
29. Teodorovic, S., Walls, C. D. & Elmendorf, H. G. Bidirectional transcription is an inherent feature of Giardia lamblia promoters and contributes to an abundance of sterile antisense transcripts throughout the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 2544–2553 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
30. Perocchi, F., Xu, Z., Clauder-Münster, S. & Steinmetz, L. M. Antisense artifacts in transcriptome microarray experiments are resolved by actinomycin D. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, e128 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Akhtar, A. Ladurner, S. Blandin, R. Aiyar, E. Mancera and E. Fritsch for comments on the manuscript, J. Toedling for discussion and for the template of the website, C. Girardot for data submission to ArrayExpress, N. Proudfoot for access to experimental equipment, and the contributors to the Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org) and R (http://www.r-project.org) projects for their software. This work was supported by grants to L.M.S. from the National Institutes of Health and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, by a SystemsX fellowship to E.G., by a Roche fellowship to J.C. and by grants to F.S. from SNF and NCCR Frontiers in Genetics.

Author Contributions L.M.S., Z.X. and W.W. designed the research; Z.X. and W.W. annotated the transcripts with the help of J.G. and F.P.; W.W. and Z.X. performed analysis of the transcripts with the help of J.G.; F.P. and S.C.-M. performed the array hybridizations; J.C. E.G. and F.S. provided samples for the rrp6Δ mutant, and designed and performed validation polymerase chain reaction with reverse transcription and 5′ RACE experiments; L.M.S., J.G., F.S. and W.H. supervised the research; and L.M.S., Z.X., W.W., J.G. and W.H. wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

1. Zhenyu Xu and Wu Wei: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

1. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany ,
   Zhenyu Xu, Wu Wei, Julien Gagneur, Fabiana Perocchi, Sandra Clauder-Münster & Lars M. Steinmetz
2. Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RE, UK ,
   Jurgi Camblong
3. Department of Cell Biology, Sciences III, University of Geneva, 30 Quai E. Ansermet, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland,
   Elisa Guffanti & Françoise Stutz
4. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK
   Wolfgang Huber

Authors

1. Zhenyu Xu
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
2. Wu Wei
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
3. Julien Gagneur
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
4. Fabiana Perocchi
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
5. Sandra Clauder-Münster
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
6. Jurgi Camblong
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
7. Elisa Guffanti
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
8. Françoise Stutz
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
9. Wolfgang Huber
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
10. Lars M. Steinmetz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toLars M. Steinmetz.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Data, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1, 2, 4, and 7-10, Supplementary References and Supplementary Figures 1-5 with Legends, (see separate files s2-s7 for Supplementary Tables 3, 5, 6 and 11-13). (PDF 430 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

Supplementary Table 3: Transcript boundaries for ORF-Ts, SUTs and CUTs (XLS 1600 kb)

Supplementary Table 5

Supplementary Table 5: Primers used in this study, RT-PCR and 5’ RACE results (XLS 53 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

Supplementary Table 6: List of SUTs with at least 2 fold increase in rrp6Δ vs. WT. (XLS 27 kb)

Supplementary Table 11

Supplementary Table 11: Transcripts initiating from shared NFRs (XLS 422 kb)

Supplementary Table 12

Supplementary Table 12: List of 19 examples like GAL80-SUR7 (XLS 25 kb)

Supplementary Table 13

Supplementary Table 13: Expression level of transcript pairs containing SUTs (XLS 169 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, Z., Wei, W., Gagneur, J. et al. Bidirectional promoters generate pervasive transcription in yeast.Nature 457, 1033–1037 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07728

Download citation

• Received: 13 September 2008
• Accepted: 19 December 2008
• Published: 25 January 2009
• Issue Date: 19 February 2009
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07728

Editorial Summary

Small RNAs make the CUT

Two papers in this issue reveal the prevalence of cryptic or hidden transcription in the yeast genome. Cryptic unstable transcripts (CUTs) are a major class of RNA polymerase II transcripts in budding yeast and are degraded immediately after being synthesized. They had therefore escaped detection until recently. In the current papers, high-resolution genome analyses reveal that CUTs arise predominantly from promoter regions and in an antisense direction. There is therefore a widespread occurrence of inherently bidirectional promoters in yeast, which hints at a regulatory function for these non-coding transcripts.

Associated content