The promise of induced pluripotent stem cells in research and therapy (original) (raw)
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126, 663–676 (2006). This breakthrough paper describes the derivation of iPS cells directly from mouse somatic cells through the ectopic co-expression of reprogramming transcription factors, providing an alternative source of pluripotent cells for research. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dreisch, H. Entwicklungsmechanische Studien I. Der Wert der ersten beiden Furchungszellen in der Echinodermenentwickelung. Experimentelle Erzeugung von Teil und Doppelbildungen. Z. Wiss. Zool.53, 160–183 (1891). Google Scholar
Dewey, M. J., Martin, D. W. Jr, Martin, G. R. & Mintz, B. Mosaic mice with teratocarcinoma-derived mutant cells deficient in hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA74, 5564–5568 (1977). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gardner, R. L. Mouse chimeras obtained by the injection of cells into the blastocyst. Nature220, 596–597 (1968). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brinster, R. L. The effect of cells transferred into the mouse blastocyst on subsequent development. J. Exp. Med.140, 1049–1056 (1974). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Evans, M. J. & Kaufman, M. H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature292, 154–156 (1981). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Martin, G. R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA78, 7634–7638 (1981). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science282, 1145–1147 (1998). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Vogel, G. & Holden, C. Ethics questions add to concerns about NIH lines. Science321, 756–757 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Mosher, J. T. et al. Lack of population diversity in commonly used human embryonic stem-cell lines. N. Engl. J. Med.362, 183–185 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tabar, V. et al. Therapeutic cloning in individual parkinsonian mice. Nature Med.14, 379–381 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Noggle, S. et al. Human oocytes reprogram somatic cells to a pluripotent state. Nature478, 70–75 (2011). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Park, I. H. et al. Reprogramming of human somatic cells to pluripotency with defined factors. Nature451, 141–146 (2008). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell131, 861–872 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science318, 1917–1920 (2007). ArticleADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M., Brennand, K. & Hochedlinger, K. Reprogramming of pancreatic β cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Curr. Biol.18, 890–894 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Eminli, S., Utikal, J., Arnold, K., Jaenisch, R. & Hochedlinger, K. Reprogramming of neural progenitor cells into induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of exogenous Sox2 expression. Stem Cells26, 2467–2474 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kim, J. B. et al. Pluripotent stem cells induced from adult neural stem cells by reprogramming with two factors. Nature454, 646–650 (2008). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hanna, J. et al. Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency. Cell133, 250–264 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Aoi, T. et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells. Science321, 699–702 (2008). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Utikal, J., Maherali, N., Kulalert, W. & Hochedlinger, K. Sox2 is dispensable for the reprogramming of melanocytes and melanoma cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Cell Sci.122, 3502–3510 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun, N. et al. Feeder-free derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells from adult human adipose stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 15720–15725 (2009). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Maherali, N. et al. A high-efficiency system for the generation and study of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell3, 340–345 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tesar, P. J. et al. New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature448, 196–199 (2007). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wray, J., Kalkan, T. & Smith, A. G. The ground state of pluripotency. Biochem. Soc. Trans.38, 1027–1032 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hanna, J. H., Saha, K. & Jaenisch, R. Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell143, 508–525 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Maherali, N. & Hochedlinger, K. Guidelines and techniques for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell3, 595–605 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D. T. & Hochedlinger, K. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell2, 230–240 (2008). This study enumerated the molecular markers and functional criteria for defining reprogrammed cell populations. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chan, E. M. et al. Live cell imaging distinguishes bona fide human iPS cells from partially reprogrammed cells. Nature Biotechnol.27, 1033–1037 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Payer, B., Lee, J. T. & Namekawa, S. H. X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells. Hum. Genet.130, 265–280 (2011). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell1, 55–70 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M. et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature465, 175–181 (2010). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Boland, M. J. et al. Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature461, 91–94 (2009). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, X. Y. et al. iPS cells produce viable mice through tetraploid complementation. Nature461, 86–90 (2009). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Eakin, G. S., Hadjantonakis, A. K., Papaioannou, V. E. & Behringer, R. R. Developmental potential and behavior of tetraploid cells in the mouse embryo. Dev. Biol.288, 150–159 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Eggan, K. & Jaenisch, R. Differentiation of F1 embryonic stem cells into viable male and female mice by tetraploid embryo complementation. Methods Enzymol.365, 25–39 (2003). PubMed Google Scholar
Lensch, M. W., Schlaeger, T. M., Zon, L. I. & Daley, G. Q. Teratoma formation assays with human embryonic stem cells: a rationale for one type of human-animal chimera. Cell Stem Cell1, 253–258 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Park, I. H. et al. Disease-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell134, 877–886 (2008). This study derived iPS cells from patients with a range of diseases, demonstrating the applications of iPS cells for disease modelling, pathogenesis studies and drug development. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Daley, G. Q. et al. Broader implications of defining standards for the pluripotency of iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell4, 200–202 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Miura, K. et al. Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Nature Biotechnol.27, 743–745 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Feng, Q. et al. Hemangioblastic derivatives from human induced pluripotent stem cells exhibit limited expansion and early senescence. Stem Cells28, 704–712 (2010). PubMed Google Scholar
Hu, B. Y. et al. Neural differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells follows developmental principles but with variable potency. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 4335–4340 (2010). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature467, 285–290 (2010). This report describes an exhaustive comparison of pluripotent stem cells derived from mouse embryos or reprogrammed through nuclear transfer or transcription factor co-expression, by using severalin vitrodifferentiation assays and methylation analysis; it revealed that iPS cells manifest molecular and behavioural features of the donor tissue of origin, indicating a 'memory' of the somatic tissue. ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu, Q., Friedrich, A. M., Johnson, L. V. & Clegg, D. O. Memory in induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogrammed human retinal-pigmented epithelial cells show tendency for spontaneous redifferentiation. Stem Cells28, 1981–1991 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bar-Nur, O., Russ, H. A., Efrat, S. & Benvenisty, N. Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet Beta cells. Cell Stem Cell9, 17–23 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Urbach, A., Bar-Nur, O., Daley, G. Q. & Benvenisty, N. Differential modeling of fragile X syndrome by human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell6, 407–411 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bock, C. et al. Reference maps of human ES and iPS cell variation enable high-throughput characterization of pluripotent cell lines. Cell144, 439–452 (2011). This study generated genome-wide reference maps of DNA methylation and gene expression, together with the differentiation potential of each cell line, providing a resource for assessing the similarity of ES cells and iPS cells, as well as for predicting the differentiation efficiency of a particular cell line and creating a scorecard for the comprehensive characterization of any pluripotent cell line. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pick, M. et al. Clone- and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells27, 2686–2690 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ben-David, U., Mayshar, Y. & Benvenisty, N. Large-scale analysis reveals acquisition of lineage-specific chromosomal aberrations in human adult stem cells. Cell Stem Cell9, 97–102 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hussein, S. M. et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature471, 58–62 (2011). This study showed that significantly more CNVs were present in early-passage human iPS cells than in intermediate-passage human iPS cells, fibroblasts or human ES cells; it also provided evidence that CNVs conferred a selective disadvantage. ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Laurent, L. C. et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell8, 106–118 (2011). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghosh, Z. et al. Persistent donor cell gene expression among human induced pluripotent stem cells contributes to differences with human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE5, e8975 (2010). ADSPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wernig, M. et al. A drug-inducible transgenic system for direct reprogramming of multiple somatic cell types. Nature Biotechnol.26, 916–924 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Lister, R. et al. Hotspots of aberrant epigenomic reprogramming in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature471, 68–73 (2011). This study analysed the methylomes of human iPS cells, ES cells, somatic cells, and differentiated iPS and ES cells, and revealed megabase-scale DMRs in iPS cells, indicating incomplete reprogramming of these cells. ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shen, Y. et al. X-inactivation in female human embryonic stem cells is in a nonrandom pattern and prone to epigenetic alterations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 4709–4714 (2008). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Marchetto, M. C. et al. A model for neural development and treatment of Rett syndrome using human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell143, 527–539 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pomp, O. et al. Unexpected X chromosome skewing during culture and reprogramming of human somatic cells can be alleviated by exogenous telomerase. Cell Stem Cell9, 156–165 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell125, 315–326 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Newman, A. M. & Cooper, J. B. Lab-specific gene expression signatures in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 258–262 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Humpherys, D. et al. Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science293, 95–97 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Soldner, F. et al. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell136, 964–977 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Carey, B. W. et al. Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell9, 588–598 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ohi, Y. et al. Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells. Nature Cell Biol.13, 541–549 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Polo, J. M. et al. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotechnol.28, 848–855 (2010). CAS Google Scholar
Martinez, Y. et al. Cellular diversity within embryonic stem cells: pluripotent clonal sublines show distinct differentiation potential. J. Cell. Mol. Med.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01334.x (in the press).
Osafune, K. et al. Marked differences in differentiation propensity among human embryonic stem cell lines. Nature Biotechnol.26, 313–315 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Muller, F. J. et al. A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells. Nature Methods8, 315–317 (2011). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, G. et al. Modelling pathogenesis and treatment of familial dysautonomia using patient-specific iPSCs. Nature461, 402–406 (2009). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Moretti, A. et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med.363, 1397–1409 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Itzhaki, I. et al. Modelling the long QT syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature471, 225–229 (2011). This study generated iPS cells from patients with long QT syndrome and stimulated them to differentiate into cardiomyocytes that paralleled the disease phenotypein vitro, and these cells were then used to evaluate the potency of existing and new therapeutic agents. ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Agarwal, S. et al. Telomere elongation in induced pluripotent stem cells from dyskeratosis congenita patients. Nature464, 292–296 (2010). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Batista, L. F. et al. Telomere shortening and loss of self-renewal in dyskeratosis congenita induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature474, 399–402 (2011). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Agarwal, S. & Daley, G. Q. Telomere dynamics in dyskeratosis congenita: the long and the short of iPS. Cell Res.21, 1157–1160 (2011). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hanna, J. et al. Treatment of sickle cell anemia mouse model with iPS cells generated from autologous skin. Science318, 1920–1923 (2007). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wernig, M. et al. Neurons derived from reprogrammed fibroblasts functionally integrate into the fetal brain and improve symptoms of rats with Parkinson's disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 5856–5861 (2008). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, T., Zhang, Z. N., Rong, Z. & Xu, Y. Immunogenicity of induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature474, 212–215 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Harrison, N. J., Baker, D. & Andrews, P. W. Culture adaptation of embryonic stem cells echoes germ cell malignancy. Int. J. Androl.30, 275–281 (2007). PubMed Google Scholar
Mayshar, Y. et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 521–531 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Murry, C. E. & Keller, G. Differentiation of embryonic stem cells to clinically relevant populations: lessons from embryonic development. Cell132, 661–680 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lowry, W. E. et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells from dermal fibroblasts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 2883–2888 (2008). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Huangfu, D. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nature Biotechnol.26, 1269–1275 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Sommer, C. A. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell generation using a single lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells27, 543–549 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Anokye-Danso, F. et al. Highly efficient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell8, 376–388 (2011). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Woltjen, K. et al. piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature458, 766–770 (2009). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Somers, A. et al. Generation of transgene-free lung disease-specific human induced pluripotent stem cells using a single excisable lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells28, 1728–1740 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, W. & Freed, C. R. Adenoviral gene delivery can reprogram human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells27, 2667–2674 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M., Nagaya, M., Utikal, J., Weir, G. & Hochedlinger, K. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science322, 945–949 (2008). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Okita, K., Nakagawa, M., Hyenjong, H., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science322, 949–953 (2008). ADSCASPubMed Google Scholar
Si-Tayeb, K. et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by simple transient transfection of plasmid DNA encoding reprogramming factors. BMC Dev. Biol.10, 81 (2010). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fusaki, N., Ban, H., Nishiyama, A., Saeki, K. & Hasegawa, M. Efficient induction of transgene-free human pluripotent stem cells using a vector based on Sendai virus, an RNA virus that does not integrate into the host genome. Proc. Jpn Acad.85, 348–362 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Kim, D. et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell4, 472–476 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, H. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell4, 381–384 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Warren, L. et al. Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. Cell Stem Cell7, 618–630 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Miyoshi, N. et al. Reprogramming of mouse and human cells to pluripotency using mature microRNAs. Cell Stem Cell8, 633–638 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hanna, J. et al. Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 9222–9227 (2010). ADSCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Buecker, C. et al. A murine ESC-like state facilitates transgenesis and homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell6, 535–546 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Generation of rat and human induced pluripotent stem cells by combining genetic reprogramming and chemical inhibitors. Cell Stem Cell4, 16–19 (2009). PubMed Google Scholar
Nichols, J. & Smith, A. Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell4, 487–492 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar