Elevated CO2 further lengthens growing season under warming conditions (original) (raw)

Nature volume 510, pages 259–262 (2014) Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Observations of a longer growing season through earlier plant growth in temperate to polar regions have been thought to be a response to climate warming1,2,3,4,5. However, data from experimental warming studies indicate that many species that initiate leaf growth and flowering earlier also reach seed maturation and senesce earlier, shortening their active and reproductive periods6,7,8,9,10. A conceptual model to explain this apparent contradiction11, and an analysis of the effect of elevated CO2—which can delay annual life cycle events12,13,14—on changing season length, have not been tested. Here we show that experimental warming in a temperate grassland led to a longer growing season through earlier leaf emergence by the first species to leaf, often a grass, and constant or delayed senescence by other species that were the last to senesce, supporting the conceptual model. Elevated CO2 further extended growing, but not reproductive, season length in the warmed grassland by conserving water, which enabled most species to remain active longer. Our results suggest that a longer growing season, especially in years or biomes where water is a limiting factor, is not due to warming alone, but also to higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations that extend the active period of plant annual life cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 52 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.83 per issue

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Interannual variation in climate and microclimate (2007–2011).

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 2: Effect of warming and elevated CO2 on growing and reproductive season length (2007–2011).

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 3: Effect of warming and elevated CO2 on timing of annual life cycle events (2007–2011).

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 4: Effect of warming and elevated CO2 on the duration of species’ active and reproductive periods.

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Figure 5: Effect of warming and elevated CO2 on autumn soil water content (5–25 cm, September–October, 2007–2011).

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim, Y., Kimball, J. S., Zhang, K. & McDonald, K. C. Satellite detection of increasing Northern Hemisphere non-frozen seasons from 1979 to 2008: implications for regional vegetation growth. Remote Sens. Environ. 121, 472–487 (2012)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  2. Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  3. Myneni, R. B., Keeling, C. D., Tucker, C. J., Asrar, G. & Nemani, R. R. Increased plant growth in the northern latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Schwartz, M. D., Ahas, R. & Aasa, A. Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 343–351 (2006)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  6. Hoffmann, A. A. et al. Phenological changes in six Australian subalpine plants in response to experimental warming and year-to-year variation. J. Ecol. 98, 927–937 (2010)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Hollister, R. D., Webber, P. J. & Bay, C. Plant response to temperature in northern Alaska: implications for predicting vegetation change. Ecology 86, 1562–1570 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Post, E. S., Pedersen, C., Wilmers, C. C. & Forchammer, M. C. Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climatic warming. Ecology 89, 363–370 (2008)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Sherry, R. A. et al. Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 198–202 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Zavaleta, E. S. et al. Plants reverse warming effect on ecosystem water balance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9892–9893 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Steltzer, H. & Post, E. Seasons and life cycles. Science 324, 886–887 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Cleland, E. E., Chiariello, N. R., Loarie, S. R., Mooney, H. A. & Field, C. B. Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13740–13744 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  13. Körner, C. Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply. New Phytol. 172, 393–411 (2006)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Springer, C. J. & Ward, J. K. Flowering time and elevated atmospheric CO2 . New Phytol. 176, 243–255 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Fitter, A. H. & Fitter, R. S. R. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296, 1689–1691 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  16. Aldridge, G., Inouye, D. W., Forrest, J. R. K., Barr, W. A. & Miller-Rushing, A. J. Emergence of a mid-season period of low floral resources in a montane meadow ecosystem associated with climate change. J. Ecol. 99, 905–913 (2011)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Høye, T. T., Post, E., Schmidt, N. M., Trøjelsgaard, K. & Forchhammer, M. C. Shorter flowering seasons and declining abundance of flower visitors in a warmer Arctic. Nature Climate Change 3, 759–763 (2013)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  18. Richardson, A. D. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  19. Morgan, J. A. et al. C4 grasses prosper as carbon dioxide eliminates desiccation in warmed semi-arid grassland. Nature 476, 202–205 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Hovenden, M. J., Wills, K. E., Vander Schoor, J. K., Williams, A. L. & Newton, P. C. D. Flowering phenology in a species-rich temperate grassland is sensitive to warming but not elevated CO2 . New Phytol. 178, 815–822 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Breshears, D. D. et al. Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15144–15148 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  22. van Mantgem, P. J. et al. Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323, 521–524 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Fay, P. A. et al. Soil-mediated effects of subambient to increased carbon dioxide on grassland productivity. Nature Climate Change 2, 742–746 (2012)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Ainsworth, E. A. & Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 258–270 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E. & Berry, J. A. in Progress in Photosynthesis Research (ed. Biggens, J. ) 221–224 (Martinus-Nijhoff, 1987)
    Book Google Scholar
  26. Kimball, B. A. et al. Infrared heater arrays for warming ecosystem field plots. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 309–320 (2008)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  27. Miglietta, F. et al. Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) of a poplar plantation: the POPFACE fumigation system. New Phytol. 150, 465–476 (2001)
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The following individuals contributed to the installation and maintenance of the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PHACE) project: D. Smith, D. Blumenthal, E. Pendall, E. Hardy, L. Griffith, A. Hansen, K. Corp, V. Banuelos, G. Tinnin, M. West, C. Brooks, M. Busick, D. Milchunas, G. Dunn and L. Ahuja. Funding for this work was supported by the US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Center (USDA-ARS) Climate Change, Soils & Emissions Program, by the US Department of Energy’s Office of Science through the Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program, by the National Science Foundation (DEB no. 1021559) and by Colorado State University. D. Inouye provided comments that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Melissa Reyes-Fox and Heidi Steltzer: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA-ARS, Soil Plant Nutrient Research Unit and Northern Plains Area, Fort Collins, 80526, Colorado, USA
    Melissa Reyes-Fox
  2. Department of Biology, Fort Lewis College, Durango, 81301, Colorado, USA
    Heidi Steltzer
  3. Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 80523, Colorado, USA
    M. J. Trlica
  4. USDA-ARS, Agricultural Systems Research Unit and Northern Plains Area, Fort Collins, 80526, Colorado, USA
    Gregory S. McMaster
  5. Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, 80523, Colorado, USA
    Allan A. Andales
  6. USDA-ARS, Rangeland Resources Research Unit, Fort Collins, 80526, Colorado, USA
    Dan R. LeCain & Jack A. Morgan

Authors

  1. Melissa Reyes-Fox
  2. Heidi Steltzer
  3. M. J. Trlica
  4. Gregory S. McMaster
  5. Allan A. Andales
  6. Dan R. LeCain
  7. Jack A. Morgan

Contributions

M.R.-F., M.J.T., A.A.A., G.S.M. and J.A.M. designed the research. M.R.-F. and D.R.L. conducted the observations. J.A.M. oversaw the PHACE experiment. H.S. and M.R-F. analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toMelissa Reyes-Fox or Heidi Steltzer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Climate and warming effect for 2007–2011.

a, b, Seasonal variation in precipitation and air temperature for the study site (a) and cumulative growing degree days (GDD) in control and warmed plots, averaged across CO2 levels (b) (means, n = 10 plots). Mean annual temperature (MAT) and total annual precipitation (TAP) are listed each year.

Extended Data Figure 2 Seasonal variation in soil water content for 2007–2011.

Values are means ± 1 s.e.m. for soil depth 5–25 cm (n = 5 plots). Mean annual soil water content (SWC) for control is represented by the horizontal grey line; vertical dashed lines show reproductive season timing for control.

Extended Data Table 1 ANOVA results for the timing of annual life cycle events 2007–2011

Full size table

Extended Data Table 2 ANOVA results for the duration of species’ active and reproductive periods

Full size table

Extended Data Table 3 ANOVA results for autumn soil water content

Full size table

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reyes-Fox, M., Steltzer, H., Trlica, M. et al. Elevated CO2 further lengthens growing season under warming conditions.Nature 510, 259–262 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13207

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Growing seasons lengthened by high CO2

Lengthening plant growing seasons in temperate and polar regions in recent years have been attributed to rising temperatures, but the effect on individual species can be to bring the growing season forward without actually lengthening it. In a series of warming and CO2 enrichment experiments in temperate grasslands in Wyoming, these authors show that temperature increase brings forward the growing season of early leafing species, whereas late-season species extend their life cycle, leading to a longer growing season. The latter effect is enhanced by elevated CO2, particularly when water availability is limited.

Associated content