Dynamic modularity in protein interaction networks predicts breast cancer outcome (original) (raw)

• Chuang, H.Y., Lee, E., Liu, Y.T., Lee, D. & Ideker, T. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 140 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Brown, K.R. & Jurisica, I. Online predicted human interaction database. Bioinformatics 21, 2076–2082 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Su, A.I. et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6062–6067 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chatr-aryamontri, A. et al. MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D572–D574 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• von Mering, C. et al. STRING 7–recent developments in the integration and prediction of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D358–D362 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fraser, H.B. Modularity and evolutionary constraint on proteins. Nat. Genet. 37, 351–352 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Han, J.D. et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 430, 88–93 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Barabasi, A.L. & Oltvai, Z.N. Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 5, 101–113 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• de Lichtenberg, U., Jensen, L.J., Brunak, S. & Bork, P. Dynamic complex formation during the yeast cell cycle. Science 307, 724–727 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tengowski, M.W., Feng, D., Sutovsky, M. & Sutovsky, P. Differential expression of genes encoding constitutive and inducible 20S proteasomal core subunits in the testis and epididymis of theophylline- or 1,3-dinitrobenzene-exposed rats. Biol. Reprod. 76, 149–163 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Thomas, M.K., Yao, K.M., Tenser, M.S., Wong, G.G. & Habener, J.F. Bridge-1, a novel PDZ-domain coactivator of E2A-mediated regulation of insulin gene transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 8492–8504 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yip, K.Y., Yu, H., Kim, P.M., Schultz, M. & Gerstein, M. The tYNA platform for comparative interactomics: a web tool for managing, comparing and mining multiple networks. Bioiformatics 22, 2968–2970 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yu, H., Greenbaum, D., Xin Lu, H., Zhu, X. & Gerstein, M. Genomic analysis of essentiality within protein networks. Trends Genet. 20, 227–231 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Puntervoll, P. et al. ELM server: A new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3625–3630 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Letunic, I. et al. SMART 5: domains in the context of genomes and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D257–D260 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Karnoub, A.E. & Weinberg, R.A. Ras oncogenes: split personalities. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 517–531 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• McKusick, V.A. Mendelian inheritance in man and its online version, OMIM. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 588–604 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Futreal, P.A. et al. A census of human cancer genes. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 177–183 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• van de Vijver, M.J. et al. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 347, 1999–2009 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Roukos, D.H. Prognosis of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N. Engl. J. Med. 357, 1555–1556, author reply 1556.
• Soderlund, K. et al. Intact Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex predicts good response to radiotherapy in early breast cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 68, 50–58 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tusher, V.G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116–5121 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chang, H.Y. et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol. 2, E7 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, R. et al. The prognostic role of a gene signature from tumorigenic breast-cancer cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 217–226 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sorlie, T. et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8418–8423 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Easton, D.F. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci. Nature 447, 1087–1093 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Frey, B.J. & Dueck, D. Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Paik, S. et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 351, 2817–2826 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Buyse, M. et al. Validation and clinical utility of a 70-gene prognostic signature for women with node-negative breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 98, 1183–1192 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Haibe-Kains, B. et al. Comparison of prognostic gene expression signatures for breast cancer. BMC Genomics 9, 394 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bertin, N. et al. Confirmation of organized modularity in the yeast interactome. PLoS Biol. e153 (2007).
• von Mering, C. et al. Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein-protein interactions. Nature 417, 399–403 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Linding, R. et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 129, 1415–1426 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar