Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology—the ethical terrain (original) (raw)

• http://www.europeanbraincouncil.org/ (accessed April 26, 2006).
• Illes, J., DeVries, R., Cho, M.K. & Schraedley-Desmond, P. Am. J. Bioeth. 6, 24–31 (2006).
  Article Google Scholar
• Eaton, M. & Kennedy, D. in Ethical Challenges in Medical Technology Innovation. p. 84–93 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 2007).
  Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, M. VCs psyched over brain investments. Venture Cap. J., published online 1 August 2005. <http://www.venturecapitaljournal.net/vcj/1122124806471.html>
• Gazzaniga, M. The Ethical Brain (The Dana Foundation Press, New York, 2005).
  Google Scholar
• Illes, J. & Kirschen, M.P. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24, 1932–1934 (2003).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• deCharms, R.C. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 18626–18231 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Collie, A. & Maruff, P. Br. J. Sports Med. 37, 2–3 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anderson, A.W. et al. Magn. Reson. Imaging 24, 693–697 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Caseras, X. et al. Psychosom. Med. 68, 947–955 (2006).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M. et al. BMC Neurol. 6, 9 (2006).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Canli, T. & Amin, Z. Brain Cogn. 50, 414–431 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Canli, T. Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy. (ed. Illes, J.) 165–183 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
  Google Scholar
• Phelps, E.A. et al. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 729–738 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Silberman, S. Wired Magazine 14, 14 (2006).
  Google Scholar
• Farah, M.J. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 1123–1129 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Farah, M.J. et al. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 421–425 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Spence, S.A. et al. Neuroreport 12, 2849–2853 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, T.M. et al. Hum. Brain Mapp. 15, 157–164 (2002).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kozel, F.A. et al. Biol. Psychol. 58, 605–613 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• National Research Council. The Polygraph and Lie Detection. (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003.) <http://darwin.nap.edu/books/0309084369/html> (accessed April 26, 2006).
• http://www.brainwavescience.com (accessed January 26, 2007).
• Temple, E. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2860–2865 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McClure, S.M. et al. Neuron 44, 379–387 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• http://members.forbes.com/forbes/2003/0901/062.html.
• Anonymous. Christ. Sci. Monit. January, p. 17 (2003).
• Lawton, G. New Scientist February, p. 18 (2006).
• Laurence, C. Sunday Telegraph (London) January, p. 5 (2005).
• Hoag, H. Nature 423, 796–798 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• President's Bioethics Council. Better Memories: The Promise and Perils of Pharmacological Interventions. (President's Council on Bioethics, HarperCollins, Washington, DC, 2003).
• Illes, J. Cerebrum 6, 73–80 (2004).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Greely, H.T. Regan lecture (Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, 2004).
  Google Scholar
• Schuman, D. Comment on: J. Illes. Authenticity, bluffing and the privacy of human thought (Lecture presented at the University of Texas, Dallas, January 9, 2007).
  Google Scholar
• http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/20/science/20SCAN.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5007&en=20e627931944313d&ex=1397880000&partner=USERLAND
• Quackwatch: A skeptical view of SPECT scans and Dr. Daniel Amen. http://www.quackwatch.org/06ResearchProjects/amen.html
• Kennedy, D. in Neuroethics: Mapping the Field, vol. 1. (ed. Marcus, S.J.) 193–207 (The Dana Press, San Francisco, 2002).
  Google Scholar
• Illes, J. & Racine, E. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, W3–W4 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Illes, J., Kirschen, M.P. & Gabrieli, J.D. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 205 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Olsen, S. Science 307, 1548–1550 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• http://www.cognitiveliberty.org/ (accessed April 26, 2006).
• Moreno, J.D. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 149–153 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Childress, A.R. et al. Am. J. Psychiatry 156, 11–18 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gray, A.J. J. R. Soc. Med. 95, 72–76 (2002).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Illes, J. et al. Radiology 228, 346–351 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Lin, Z., Owen, A.B. & Altman, R. Science 305, 183 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• NHGRI. Promoting safe and effective genetic testing in the United States. <http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/research/fed/tfgt> (accessed October 10, 2005).
• Bookheimer, S.Y. et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 343, 450–456 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jack, C.R. et al. Neurology 60, 253–260 (2003).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Albert, M. The Use of MRI and PET for Clinical Diagnosis of Dementia and Investigation of Cognitive Impairment. Working Report: Neuroimaging Workgroup of the Alzheimer's Association (Alzheimer's, Chicago, IL. 2005).
  Google Scholar
• Collins, F.S. N. Engl. J. Med. 34, 186–188 (1996).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wadman, M. The DNA hard sell. New York Times Dec. 16, p. A15 (1996).
• Saltus, R. Gene test for cancer risk is offered; some geneticists dispute its value. Boston Globe Oct. 25, p. QA1 (1996).
• Illes, J., Rosen, A.C., Grecius, M. & Racine, E. Prospects for prediction: an ethics analysis of neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1097, 278–295 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Leshner, A. Am. J. Bioeth. 5, 1–2 (2005).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar