A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areas (original) (raw)

References

  1. Munich, Re NatCatSERVICE Database (Munich Reinsurance Company, Geo Risks Research, 2013).
    Google Scholar
  2. Hirabayashi, Y. et al. Global flood risk under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 816–821 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Winsemius et al. Global drivers of future river flood risk. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 381–385 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Arnell, N. W. & Gosling, S. N. The impacts of climate change on river flood risk at the global scale. Climatic Change 134, 387–401 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Jongman, B. et al. Declining vulnerability to river floods and the global benefits of adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2271–E2280 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Ward, P. J. et al. Assessing flood risk at the global scale: Model setup, results, and sensitivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 044019 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Winsemius, H. C. et al. A framework for global river flood risk assessments. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 1871–1892 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. UNISDR Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Making Development Sustainable: The Future of Disaster Risk Management (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction Secretariat, 2015).
  9. Ward, P. J. et al. Usefulness and limitations of global flood risk models. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 712–715 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Towards a World of Cities in 2050. An Outlook on Water-Related Challenges (Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency PBL, 2014).
  11. Sadoff, C. W. et al. Securing Water, Sustaining Growth: Report of the GWP/OECD Task Force on Water Security and Sustainable Growth (Univ. Oxford, 2015).
    Google Scholar
  12. Aerts, J. C. J. H. et al. Evaluating flood resilience strategies for coastal megacities. Science 344, 473–475 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Kind, J. M. Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands. J. Flood Risk Manag. 7, 103–117 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Kull, D., Mechler, R. & Hochrainer-Stigler, S. Probabilistic cost-benefit analysis of disaster risk management in a development context. Disasters 37, 374–400 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Scussolini, P. et al. FLOPROS: an evolving global database of flood protection standards. Nat. Hazard Earth Sys. 16, 1049–1061 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. VanVuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change 109, 5–31 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 122, 387–400 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Sperna Weiland, F. C., Van Beek, L. P. H., Kwadijk, J. C. J. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Global patterns of change in discharge regimes for 2100. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16, 1047–1062 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Sampson, C. C. et al. A high-resolution global flood hazard model. Wat. Resour. Res. 51, 7358–7381 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Trigg, M. A. et al. The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 094014 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Alfieri, L., Feyen, L., Dottori, F. & Bianchi, A. Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios. Glob. Environ. Change 35, 199–212 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Di Baldassarre et al. Socio-hydrology: conceptualising human-flood interactions. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17, 3295–3303 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Pappenberger, F. et al. The monetary benefit of early flood warnings in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 51, 278–291 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Van Wesenbeeck, B. K., de Boer, W., Narayan, S., van der Star, W. R. L. & de Vries, M. B. Coastal and riverine ecosystems as adaptive flood defences under a changing climate. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-016-9714-z (2016).
  25. Hallegatte et al. Shock Waves: Managing the Impacts of Climate Change on Poverty (World Bank, 2016).
    Google Scholar
  26. Koks et al. Integrated direct and indirect flood risk modeling: development and sensitivity analysis. Risk Anal. 35, 882–900 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Jonkman, S. N., Vrijling, J. K. & Vouwenvelder, A. C.W. M. Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method. Nat. Hazards 46, 353–389 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Jonkman, S. N. Advanced flood risk analysis required. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 1004 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Van Beek, L. P. H., Wada, Y. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Global monthly water stress: I. Water balance and water availability. Wat. Resour. Res. 47, W07517 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Wada, Y., Van Beek, L. P. H. & Bierkens, M. F. P. Nonsustainable groundwater sustaining irrigation: A global assessment. Wat. Resour. Res. 48, W00L06 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Weedon, G. P. et al. Creation of the WATCH Forcing Data and its use to assess global and regional reference crop evaporation over land during the twentieth century. J. Hydrometeorol. 12, 823–848 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J. & Piontek, F. A trend-preserving bias correction - the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dynam. 4, 219–236 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Yamazaki, D., Kanae, S., Kim, H. & Oki, T. A physically based description of floodplain inundation dynamics in a global river routing model. Wat. Resour. Res. 47, W04501 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Dottori, F. et al. Development and evaluation of a framework for global flood hazard mapping. Adv. Wat. Res. 94, 87–102 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Pappenberger, F., Dutra, E., Wetterhall, F. & Cloke, H. L. Deriving global flood hazard maps of fluvial floods through a physical model cascade. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 16, 4143–4156 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Alfieri, L. et al. Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world. Earth’s Future 5, 171–182 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., Van Drecht, G. & De Vos, M. The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 73–86 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Van Vuuren, D. P., Lucas, P. L. & Hilderink, H. Downscaling drivers of global environmental change: enabling use of global SRES scenarios at the national and grid levels. Glob. Environ. Change 17, 114130 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Bouwman, A. F., Kram, T. & Klein Goldewijk, K. Integrated Modelling of Global Environmental Change. An Overview of IMAGE 2.4 (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2006).
    Google Scholar
  40. Jongman, B., Ward, P. J. & Aerts, J. C.J. H. Global exposure to river and coastal flooding: long term trends and changes. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 823–835 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Ward, P. J. et al. Strong influence of El Niño Southern Oscillation on flood risk around the world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15659–15644 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  42. Aerts, J. C. J. H., Botzen, W. & De Moel, H. Cost estimates of flood protection and resilience measures. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1294, 39–51 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Jonkman, S. N., Hillen, M. M., Nicholls, R. J., Kanning, W. & Van Ledden, M. Costs of adapting coastal defences to sea-level rise—New estimates and their implications. J. Coast. Res. 29, 1212–1226 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Lenk, S., Rybski, D., Heidrich, O., Dawson, R. J. & Kropp, J. P. Costs of sea dikes—regressions and uncertainty estimates. Nat. Hazard. Earth Sys. 17, 765–779 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Bos, A. J. Optimal Safety Level for the New Orleans East Polder. A Preliminary Risk Analysis (VU University Amsterdam, 2008).
    Google Scholar
  46. De Grave, P. & Baarse, G. Kosten van maatregelen. Informatie ten behoeve van het project Waterveiligheid 21e eeuw (Deltares, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  47. The 2009 Global Construction Cost and Reference Yearbook (Compass International Consultants, 2009).
  48. Ward et al. Partial costs of global climate change adaptation for the supply of raw industrial and municipal water: a methodology and application. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 044011 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references