Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry (original) (raw)

• Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198–207 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 312, 212–217 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carr, S. et al. The need for guidelines in publication of peptide and protein identification data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 531–533 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Geer, L.Y. et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 3, 958–964 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sadygov, R.G. & Yates, J.R. A hypergeometric probability model for protein identification and validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein sequence databases. Anal. Chem. 75, 3792–3798 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fenyo, D. & Beavis, R.C. A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 75, 768–774 (2003).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• King, N.L. et al. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome with PeptideAtlas. Genome Biol. [online] 7, R106 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Brunner, E. et al. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 576–583 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yates, J.R., Morgan, S.F., Gatlin, C.L., Griffin, P.R. & Eng, J.K. Method to compare collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides: potential for library searching and subtractive analysis. Anal. Chem. 70, 3557–3565 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Craig, R., Cortens, J.C., Fenyo, D. & Beavis, R.C. Using annotated peptide mass spectrum libraries for protein identification. J. Proteome Res. 5, 1843–1849 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Frewen, B.E., Merrihew, G.E., Wu, C.C., Noble, W.S. & MacCoss, M.J. Analysis of peptide MS/MS spectra from large-scale proteomics experiments using spectrum libraries. Anal. Chem. 78, 5678–5684 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lam, H. et al. Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS. Proteomics 7, 655–667 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stein, S.E. & Scott, D.R. Optimization and testing of mass-spectral library search algorithms for compound identification. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 859–866 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii, A.I. et al. Dynamic spectrum quality assessment and iterative computational analysis of shotgun proteomic data: toward more efficient identification of post-translational modifications, sequence polymorphisms, and novel peptides. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 652–670 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mann, M. & Wilm, M. Error tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Anal. Chem. 66, 4390–4399 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tabb, D.L., Saraf, A. & Yates, J.R. GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model. Anal. Chem. 75, 6415–6421 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tanner, S. et al. InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 77, 4626–4639 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bern, M., Cai, Y.H. & Goldberg, D. Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 79, 1393–1400 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate—a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 57, 289–300 (1995).
  Google Scholar
• Elias, J.E. & Gygi, S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 4, 207–214 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A.I., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 74, 5383–5392 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Storey, J.D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kapp, E.A. et al. An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: Sensitivity and specificity analysis. Proteomics 5, 3475–3490 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Elias, J.E., Haas, W., Faherty, B.K. & Gygi, S.P. Comparative evaluation of mass spectrometry platforms used in large-scale proteomics investigations. Nat. Methods 2, 667–675 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lopez-Ferrer, D. et al. Statistical model for large-scale peptide identification in databases from tandem mass spectra using SEQUEST. Anal. Chem. 76, 6853–6860 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anderson, D.C., Li, W.Q., Payan, D.G. & Noble, W.S. A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. J. Proteome Res. 2, 137–146 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kislinger, T. et al. PRISM, a generic large scale proteomic investigation strategy for mammals. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2, 96–106 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ulintz, P.J., Zhu, J., Qin, Z.H.S. & Andrews, P.C. Improved classification of mass spectrometry database search results using newer machine learning approaches. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 497–509 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gentzel, M., Kocher, T., Ponnusamy, S. & Wilm, M. Preprocessing of tandem mass spectrometric data to support automatic protein identification. Proteomics 3, 1597–1610 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mujezinovic, N. et al. Cleaning of raw peptide MS/MS spectra: improved protein identification following deconvolution of multiply charged peaks, isotope clusters, and removal of background noise. Proteomics 6, 5117–5131 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Beer, I., Barnea, E., Ziv, T. & Admon, A. Improving large-scale proteomics by clustering of mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 4, 950–960 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tabb, D.L., Thompson, M.R., Khalsa-Moyers, G., VerBerkmoes, N.C. & McDonald, W.H. MS2Grouper: Group assessment and synthetic replacement of duplicate proteomic tandem mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 16, 1250–1261 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, N. et al. ProblDtree: an automated software program capable of identifying multiple peptides from a single collision-induced dissociation spectrum collected by a tandem mass spectrometer. Proteomics 5, 4096–4106 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moore, R.E., Young, M.K. & Lee, T.D. Method for screening peptide fragment ion mass spectra prior to database searching. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 11, 422–426 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wong, J.W.H., Sullivan, M.J., Cartwright, H.M. & Cagney, G. msmsEval: tandem mass spectral quality assignment for high-throughput proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics [online] 8, 51 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Flikka, K., Martens, L., Vandekerckhoe, J., Gevaert, K. & Eidhammer, I. Improving the reliability and throughput of mass spectrometry-based proteomics by spectrum quality filtering. Proteomics 6, 2086–2094 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xu, M. et al. Assessing data quality of peptide mass spectra obtained by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 4, 300–305 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Colinge, J., Magnin, J., Dessingy, T., Giron, M. & Masselot, A. Improved peptide charge state assignment. Proteomics 3, 1434–1440 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tabb, D.L. et al. Determination of peptide and protein ion charge states by Fourier transformation of isotope-resolved mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 17, 903–915 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Resing, K.A. et al. Improving reproducibility and sensitivity in identifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 3556–3568 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Price, T.S. et al. EBP, a program for protein identification using multiple tandem mass spectrometry data sets. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 527–536 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Higgs, R.E. et al. Estimating the statistical significance of peptide identifications from shotgun proteomics experiments. J. Proteome Res. 6, 1758–1767 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Keller, A., Eng, J., Zhang, N., Li, X.-J. & Aebersold, R. A uniform proteomics MS/MS analysis platform utilizing open XML file formats. Mol. Syst. Biol. [online] 1, E1–E8 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.V. & Mann, M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13417–13422 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Strittmatter, E.F. et al. Application of peptide LC retention time information in a discriminant function for peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 3, 760–769 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Qian, W.J. et al. Probability-based evaluation of peptide and protein identifications from tandem mass spectrometry and SEQUEST analysis: the human proteome. J. Proteome Res. 4, 53–62 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Malmstrom, J. et al. Optimized peptide separation and identification for mass spectrometry based proteomics via free-flow electrophoresis. J. Proteome Res. 5, 2241–2249 (2006).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Xie, H. & Griffin, T.J. Trade-off between high sensitivity and increased potential for false positive peptide sequence matches using a two-dimensional linear ion trap for tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 5, 1003–1009 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cargile, B.J., Bundy, J.L., Freeman, T.W. & Stephenson, J.L. Gel based isoelectric focusing of peptides and the utility of isoelectric point in protein identification. J. Proteome Res. 3, 112–119 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. et al. High throughput quantitative analysis of serum proteins using glycopeptide capture and liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 144–155 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heller, M. et al. Added value for tandem mass spectrometry shotgun proteomics data validation through isoelectric focusing of peptides. J. Proteome Res. 4, 2273–2282 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.V. et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 2010–2021 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rudnick, P.A., Wang, Y.J., Evans, E., Lee, C.S. & Balgley, B.M. Large scale analysis of MASCOT results using a mass accuracy-based THreshold (MATH) effectively improves data interpretation. J. Proteome Res. 4, 1353–1360 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii, A.I. & Aebersold, R. Analysis, statistical validation and dissemination of large-scale proteomics data sets generated by tandem MS. Drug Discov. Today 9, 173–181 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii, A.I. & Aebersold, R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data: the protein inference problem. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1419–1440 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nesvizhskii, A.I., Keller, A., Kolker, E. & Aebersold, R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 4646–4658 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Omenn, G.S. et al. Overview of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project: results from the pilot phase with 35 collaborating laboratories and multiple analytical groups, generating a core data set of 3020 proteins and a publicly-available database. Proteomics 5, 3226–3245 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rappsilber, J. & Mann, M. What does it mean to identify a protein in proteomics? Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 74–78 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, X. et al. DBParser: web-based software for shotgun proteomic data analyses. J. Proteome Res. 3, 1002–1008 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weatherly, D.B. et al. A heuristic method for assigning a false-discovery rate for protein identifications from mascot database search results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 762–772 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bandeira, N., Tsur, D., Frank, A. & Pevzner, P.A. Protein identification by spectral networks analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 6140–6145 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• States, D.J. et al. Challenges in deriving high-confidence protein identifications from data gathered by a HUPO plasma proteome collaborative study. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 333–338 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sadygov, R.G., Liu, H.B. & Yates, J.R. Statistical models for protein validation using tandem mass spectral data and protein amino acid sequence databases. Anal. Chem. 76, 1664–1671 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mallick, P. et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 125–131 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goshe, M.B. & Smith, R.D. Stable isotope-coded proteomic mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 14, 101–109 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Old, W.M. et al. Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1487–1502 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ishihama, Y. et al. Exponentially modified protein abundance index (emPAI) for estimation of absolute protein amount in proteomics by the number of sequenced peptides per protein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1265–1272 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zybailov, B., Coleman, M.K., Florens, L. & Washburn, M.P. Correlation of relative abundance ratios derived from peptide ion chromatograms and spectrum counting for quantitative proteomic analysis using stable isotope labeling. Anal. Chem. 77, 6218–6224 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Sadygov, R.G. & Yates, J.R. III. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics. Anal. Chem. 76, 4193–4201 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Silva, J.C., Gorenstein, M.V., Li, G.Z., Vissers, J.P.C. & Geromanos, S.J. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 144–156 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X. & Marcotte, E.M. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 117–124 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blondeau, F. et al. Tandem MS analysis of brain clathrin-coated vesicles reveals their critical involvement in synaptic vesicle recycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3833–3838 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Radulovic, D. et al. Informatics platform for global proteomic profiling and biomarker discovery using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 984–997 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jaffe, J.D. et al. PEPPeR, a platform for experimental proteomic pattern recognition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 1927–1941 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, X.-J., Yi, E.C., Kemp, C.J., Zhang, H. & Aebersold, R. A software suite for the generation and comparison of peptide arrays from sets of data collected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 1328–1340 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Listgarten, J. & Emili, A. Statistical and computational methods for comparative proteomic profiling using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 419–434 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Qian, W.-J., Jacobs, J.M., Liu, T., Camp, D.G. II & Smith, R.D. Advances and challenges in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling for clinical applications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 1727–1744 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anderson, L. & Hunter, C.L. Quantitative mass spectrometric MRM assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 5, 573–588 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gentleman, R.C. et al. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol. [online] 5, R80 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Meng, F., Forbes, A.J., Miller, L.M. & Kelleher, N.L. Detection and localization of protein modifications by high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 24, 126–134 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Han, X., Jin, M., Breuker, K. & McLafferty, F.W. Extending top-down mass spectrometry to proteins with masses greater than 200 kilodaltons. Science 314, 109–112 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chait, B.T. Chemistry: mass spectrometry: bottom-up or top-down? Science 314, 65–66 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kuster, B., Schirle, M., Mallick, P. & Aebersold, R. Scoring proteomes with proteotypic peptide probes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 577–583 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Eng, J.K., McCormack, A.L. & Yates, J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass-spectral data of peptides with amino-acid-sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 5, 976–989 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Perkins, D.N., Pappin, D.J.C., Creasy, D.M. & Cottrell, J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20, 3551–3567 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Clauser, K.R., Baker, P. & Burlingame, A.L. Role of accurate mass measurement (+/− 10 ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal. Chem. 71, 2871–2882 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., Aebersold, R. & Schwilkowski, B. ProbID: a probabilistic algorithm to identify peptides through sequence database searching using tandem mass spectral data. Proteomics 2, 1406–1412 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Craig, R. & Beavis, R.C. TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 20, 1466–1467 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Colinge, J., Masselot, A., Giron, M., Dessingy, T. & Magnin, J. OLAV: Towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics 3, 1454–1463 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Matthiesen, R., Trelle, M.B., Hojrup, P., Bunkenborg, J. & Jensen, O.N. VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins. J. Proteome Res. 4, 2338–2347 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tabb, D.L., Fernando, C.G. & Chambers, M.C. MyriMatch: highly accurate tandem mass spectral peptide identification by multivariate hypergeometric analysis. J. Proteome Res. 6, 654–661 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Craig, R., Cortens, J.P. & Beavis, R.C. The use of proteotypic peptide libraries for protein identification. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1844–1850 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.S. & Taylor, J.A. Searching sequence databases via de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Biotechnol. 22, 301–315 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Frank, A. & Pevzner, P. PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal. Chem. 77, 964–973 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ma, B. et al. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17, 2337–2342 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hernandez, P., Gras, R., Frey, J. & Appel, R.D. Popitam: towards new heuristic strategies to improve protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 3, 870–878 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Desiere, F. et al. Integration with the human genome of peptide sequences obtained by high-throughput mass spectrometry. Genome Biol. [online] 6, R9 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Rauch, A. et al. Computational proteomics analysis system (CPAS): an extensible, open-source analytic system for evaluating and publishing proteomic data and high throughput biological experiments. J. Proteome Res. 5, 112–121 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Martens, L. et al. PRIDE: the proteomics identifications database. Proteomics 5, 3537–3545 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, X.J., Zhang, H., Ranish, J.A. & Aebersold, R. Automated statistical analysis of protein abundance ratios from data generated by stable-isotope dilution and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 75, 6648–6657 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• MacCoss, M.J., Wu, C.C., Liu, H.B., Sadygov, R. & Yates, J.R. A correlation algorithm for the automated quantitative analysis of shotgun proteomics data. Anal. Chem. 75, 6912–6921 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dudoit, S., Yang, Y.H., Callow, M.J. & Speed, T.P. Statistical methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Stat. Sinica 12, 111–139 (2002).
  Google Scholar
• Tusher, V.G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116–5121 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Efron, B., Tibshirani, R., Storey, J.D. & Tusher, V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96, 1151–1160 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fermin, D. et al. Novel gene and gene model detection using a whole genome open reading frame analysis in proteomics. Genome Biol. [online] 7, R35 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tanner, S. et al. Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry. Genome Res. 17, 231–239 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edwards, N.J. Novel peptide identification from tandem mass spectra using ESTs and sequence database compression. Mol. Syst. Biol. [online] 3, 102 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• Pedrioli, P.G.A. et al. A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1459–1466 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Martens, L. et al. Do we want our data raw? Including binary mass spectrometry data in public proteomics data repositories. Proteomics 5, 3501–3505 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar