A new fate mapping system reveals context-dependent random or clonal expansion of microglia (original) (raw)

Accession codes

Primary accessions

European Nucleotide Archive

Gene Expression Omnibus

References

  1. Hanisch, U.K. & Kettenmann, H. Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1387–1394 (2007).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Prinz, M. & Priller, J. Microglia and brain macrophages in the molecular age: from origin to neuropsychiatric disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 300–312 (2014).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Ransohoff, R.M. & Perry, V.H. Microglial physiology: unique stimuli, specialized responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 119–145 (2009).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Ginhoux, F. et al. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 330, 841–845 (2010).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  5. Gomez Perdiguero, E. et al. Tissue-resident macrophages originate from yolk-sac-derived erythro-myeloid progenitors. Nature 518, 547–551 (2015).
    PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Hashimoto, D. et al. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity 38, 792–804 (2013).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Hagemeyer, N. et al. Transcriptome-based profiling of yolk sac-derived macrophages reveals a role for Irf8 in macrophage maturation. EMBO J. 35, 1730–1744 (2016).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  8. Kierdorf, K. et al. Microglia emerge from erythromyeloid precursors via Pu.1- and Irf8-dependent pathways. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 273–280 (2013).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Schulz, C. et al. A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science 336, 86–90 (2012).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Sheng, J., Ruedl, C. & Karjalainen, K. Most tissue-resident macrophages except microglia are derived from fetal hematopoietic stem cells. Immunity 43, 382–393 (2015).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Goldmann, T. et al. Origin, fate and dynamics of macrophages at central nervous system interfaces. Nat. Immunol. 17, 797–805 (2016).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Grabert, K. et al. Microglial brain region-dependent diversity and selective regional sensitivities to aging. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 504–516 (2016).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Shemer, A., Erny, D., Jung, S. & Prinz, M. Microglia plasticity during health and disease: an immunological perspective. Trends Immunol. 36, 614–624 (2015).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Bruttger, J. et al. Genetic cell ablation reveals clusters of local self-renewing microglia in the mammalian central nervous system. Immunity 43, 92–106 (2015).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Elmore, M.R.P. et al. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor signaling is necessary for microglia viability, unmasking a microglia progenitor cell in the adult brain. Neuron 82, 380–397 (2014).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Sieweke, M.H. & Allen, J.E. Beyond stem cells: self-renewal of differentiated macrophages. Science 342, 1242974 (2013).
    PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Ajami, B., Bennett, J.L., Krieger, C., Tetzlaff, W. & Rossi, F.M.V. Local self-renewal can sustain CNS microglia maintenance and function throughout adult life. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1538–1543 (2007).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Mildner, A. et al. Microglia in the adult brain arise from Ly-6ChiCCR2+ monocytes only under defined host conditions. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 1544–1553 (2007).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Mildner, A. et al. Distinct and non-redundant roles of microglia and myeloid subsets in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. J. Neurosci. 31, 11159–11171 (2011).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  20. Davalos, D. et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 752–758 (2005).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Nimmerjahn, A., Kirchhoff, F. & Helmchen, F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science 308, 1314–1318 (2005).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Lawson, L.J., Perry, V.H., Dri, P. & Gordon, S. Heterogeneity in the distribution and morphology of microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 39, 151–170 (1990).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Jung, S. et al. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX3CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 4106–4114 (2000).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  24. Parkhurst, C.N. et al. Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Cell 155, 1596–1609 (2013).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  25. Goldmann, T. et al. A new type of microglia gene targeting shows TAK1 to be pivotal in CNS autoimmune inflammation. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1618–1626 (2013).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Yona, S. et al. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity 38, 79–91 (2013).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Wieghofer, P., Knobeloch, K.P. & Prinz, M. Genetic targeting of microglia. Glia 63, 1–22 (2015).
    PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Lawson, L.J., Perry, V.H. & Gordon, S. Turnover of resident microglia in the normal adult mouse brain. Neuroscience 48, 405–415 (1992).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Ajami, B., Bennett, J.L., Krieger, C., McNagny, K.M. & Rossi, F.M.V. Infiltrating monocytes trigger EAE progression, but do not contribute to the resident microglia pool. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1142–1149 (2011).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Gómez-Nicola, D., Fransen, N.L., Suzzi, S. & Perry, V.H. Regulation of microglial proliferation during chronic neurodegeneration. J. Neurosci. 33, 2481–2493 (2013).
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  31. Olmos-Alonso, A. et al. Pharmacological targeting of CSF1R inhibits microglial proliferation and prevents the progression of Alzheimer's-like pathology. Brain 139, 891–907 (2016).
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  32. Snippert, H.J. et al. Intestinal crypt homeostasis results from neutral competition between symmetrically dividing Lgr5 stem cells. Cell 143, 134–144 (2010).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Wuidart, A. et al. Quantitative lineage tracing strategies to resolve multipotency in tissue-specific stem cells. Genes Dev. 30, 1261–1277 (2016).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  34. Ghigo, C. et al. Multicolor fate mapping of Langerhans cell homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 210, 1657–1664 (2013).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  35. Alliot, F., Godin, I. & Pessac, B. Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain. Brain Res. Dev. Brain Res. 117, 145–152 (1999).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Gosselin, D. et al. Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell 159, 1327–1340 (2014).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  37. Lavin, Y. et al. Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 159, 1312–1326 (2014).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  38. Xu, J. et al. Temporal-spatial resolution fate mapping reveals distinct origins for embryonic and adult microglia in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 34, 632–641 (2015).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Gallego, B.I. et al. IOP induces upregulation of GFAP and MHC-II and microglia reactivity in mice retina contralateral to experimental glaucoma. J. Neuroinflammation 9, 92 (2012).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  40. Cen, L.P. et al. Bilateral retinal microglial response to unilateral optic nerve transection in rats. Neuroscience 311, 56–66 (2015).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Bellingan, G.J., Caldwell, H., Howie, S.E., Dransfield, I. & Haslett, C. In vivo fate of the inflammatory macrophage during the resolution of inflammation: inflammatory macrophages do not die locally, but emigrate to the draining lymph nodes. J. Immunol. 157, 2577–2585 (1996).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Gautier, E.L., Ivanov, S., Lesnik, P. & Randolph, G.J. Local apoptosis mediates clearance of macrophages from resolving inflammation in mice. Blood 122, 2714–2722 (2013).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  43. Schwab, J.M., Chiang, N., Arita, M. & Serhan, C.N. Resolvin E1 and protectin D1 activate inflammation-resolution programmes. Nature 447, 869–874 (2007).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  44. Drew, P.J. et al. Chronic optical access through a polished and reinforced thinned skull. Nat. Methods 7, 981–984 (2010).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  45. Preibisch, S., Saalfeld, S. & Tomancak, P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics 25, 1463–1465 (2009).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  46. Shankaran, M. et al. Measurement of brain microglial proliferation rates in vivo in response to neuroinflammatory stimuli: application to drug discovery. J. Neurosci. Res. 85, 2374–2384 (2007).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Salic, A. & Mitchison, T.J. A chemical method for fast and sensitive detection of DNA synthesis in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2415–2420 (2008).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  48. Emmenlauer, M. et al. XuvTools: free, fast and reliable stitching of large 3D datasets. J. Microsc. 233, 42–60 (2009).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S.L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  50. Liao, Y., Smyth, G.K. & Shi, W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e108 (2013).
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  51. Love, M.I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  52. Alexa, A. & Rahnenfuhrer, J. TopGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology. R package version 2.26.0 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank H. Snippert (University Medical Center Utrecht) and H. Clevers (Hubrecht Institute) for the R26R Confetti mouse line, M. Follo and team at Lighthouse Fluorescence Technologies Core Facility, T. Blank for critical feedback, J. Bührer for technical support, and CEMT, University of Freiburg for excellent animal care. T.L.T. is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG, TA1029/1-1) and Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts, Baden-Wuerttemberg (Research Seed Capital). M.P. is supported by the BMBF Competence Network of Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS), the Sobek-Stiftung and the DFG (SFB992, SFB1140, Reinhart-Koselleck grant). F.F.-K., J.A.P., S.J., J.P. and M.P. are supported by the SFB/TRR167 “NeuroMac”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Tuan Leng Tay, Jana Dautzenberg, Moumita Datta, Alberto Ardura-Fabregat, Ori Staszewski & Marco Prinz
  2. Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Dominic Mai & Olaf Ronneberger
  3. Department of Neuropsychiatry & Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Francisco Fernández-Klett & Josef Priller
  4. Genome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Gen Lin & Lars M Steinmetz
  5. Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Freiburg, Germany
    Sagar, Anne Drougard, J Andrew Pospisilik & Dominic Grün
  6. Center of Excellence for Fluorescent Bioanalytics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
    Thomas Stempfl
  7. Advanced Light Microscopy Technology Platform, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany
    Anca Margineanu & Anje Sporbert
  8. Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
    Lars M Steinmetz
  9. Stanford Genome Technology Center, Palo Alto, California, USA
    Lars M Steinmetz
  10. Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Steffen Jung
  11. Cluster of Excellence 'NeuroCure', German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) and Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
    Josef Priller
  12. BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Marco Prinz

Authors

  1. Tuan Leng Tay
  2. Dominic Mai
  3. Jana Dautzenberg
  4. Francisco Fernández-Klett
  5. Gen Lin
  6. Sagar
  7. Moumita Datta
  8. Anne Drougard
  9. Thomas Stempfl
  10. Alberto Ardura-Fabregat
  11. Ori Staszewski
  12. Anca Margineanu
  13. Anje Sporbert
  14. Lars M Steinmetz
  15. J Andrew Pospisilik
  16. Steffen Jung
  17. Josef Priller
  18. Dominic Grün
  19. Olaf Ronneberger
  20. Marco Prinz

Contributions

T.L.T. and M.P. conceived the study. T.L.T. established the methods. D.M., O.R. and T.L.T. designed the software and validated imaging data. T.L.T., J.D., F.F.-K., G.L., S., D.G., M.D., A.D., T.S., A.A.-F., O.S., A.M., A.S. and S.J. performed experiments and/or analyses. T.L.T., L.M.S., J.A.P., D.G., J.P., O.R. and M.P. provided supervision. T.L.T., D.M. and M.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the editing of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toTuan Leng Tay or Marco Prinz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Characterization of the Microfetti mouse model.

(a) Gating strategy for 8-color flow analysis of peripheral Ly-6C+ monocytes from Microfetti mice 5-7 days after TAM treatment. Living cells in the forward and side scatter were gated on CD45+CD11b+, followed by CD115+ to separate monocytes from granulocytes. Monocytes were distinguished by Ly-6C expression levels. Representative histograms of Confetti (GFP, YFP, RFP and CFP) expression in Microfetti Ly-6Clo monocytes (left). Confetti signals were gated on Confetti-negative WT counterparts. Expression of Confetti reporter in Ly-6Chi (open circle) and Ly-6Clo (colored) monocytes (right). Each symbol represents one mouse. Animals with Confetti-labeled Ly-6Clo monocytes were used for tracking long-term microglial self-renewal during homeostasis (n = 21 mice; data shown as total Confetti expression in Fig. 2b, 1 dead animal excluded).

(b) Detection of microglial division in vivo. Three Microfetti mice were examined by two-photon laser scanning microscopy via a cortical window six weeks after TAM treatment (see Supplemental Experimental Procedures). A representative image shows RFP+ microglial cells (arrowheads) emerged two days after targeted laser lesion (asterisk). One RFP+ microglial cell (arrow) was no longer detected in the same 200 μm depth volume on Day 2. Scale bar, 50 μm (same scale in both panels).

(c) Quantification of change in area of coverage by GFP+ and RFP+ microglia per minute of in vivo imaging over 30 minutes from Cx3cr1 GFP/+ and Microfetti mice, respectively. Each symbol represents one microglial cell. Mann Whitney U-test, P = 0.64. ns, not significant. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. n = 3 mice per genotype.

(d) Representative maximum intensity projection images for c showing two consecutive time points, t1 (red) and t2 (green), with 1 minute interval. Static structures are revealed in the overlay (yellow). Scale bar, 30 μm (same scale in both panels). See also Supplementary Videos 1 and 2.

Supplementary Figure 2 Differential regional stability of the microglial network during steady state.

(a) Representative 2D renderings of Confetti+ (green, yellow, red, and cyan colored balls) and Iba-1 immunolabeled (magenta balls) microglia from 636 μm x 636 μm x 50 μm confocal volumes of the cortex, hippocampus and cerebellum over 1-36 weeks after TAM treatment of 8 weeks old female Microfetti mice.

(b) Confetti+ microglial densities in different brain regions over 36 weeks. Microglial density (y-axis) was obtained from dividing same color cell counts by ring volume of each central ring size (x-axis). Cell densities from recorded data (red line) were plotted against densities derived from 10,000 Monte Carlo (MC) simulation of random distribution of Confetti+ microglia within each dataset (blue box plots represent simulated density distributions: central mark is the median, box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles, whiskers extend up to the 98th percentile and data points above were regarded as outliers). Measured values (red line) that appear above the 98th percentile of MC simulations (blue whiskers), for example at 8 weeks after TAM treatment in the hippocampus and cerebellum where r = 40 μm, indicate the non-random appearance of same color Confetti+ microglial cells and imply that proliferation occurred. This peak represents a single cell replication event in an arbitrary volume of 0.001 mm3. Mean data are shown. n = 5 mice per time point.

(c) Quantitative analysis of randomness of microglial cell proliferation events detected in b. A pair of same color Confetti+ microglial cells with ≤50 μm spatial distance was considered a single cell replication event. Distribution of standard deviation (SD) of a MC simulation (10,000 iterations) of locations of proliferation events derived from a uniform distribution are represented as box plots (blue box plots: central mark is the median, box represents the 25th to 75th percentiles, whiskers represent the 2nd and 98th percentiles, and outliers are plotted in red + signs). Average SD of the distribution of observed replication events to a perfect uniform distribution (black cross) was compared to MC simulation. Where the observed SD falls within the MC range between the whiskers, the locations of proliferation events can be considered randomly distributed.

Supplementary Figure 3 Spatiotemporal analysis of microglial expansion and redistribution in the injured facial nucleus.

(a) Coronal brain section of a Cx3cr1 GFP/+ mouse 7d post facial nerve lesion depicts areas analyzed for kinetics of microglial proliferation in the facial nucleus degeneration model. Microglial cells were marked by GFP (green). Neurons were immunolabeled with NeuN (blue) to locate the facial nucleus in the pons. The facial nucleus, a 200 μm broad perinuclear zone, and the parvicellular reticular nucleus, alpha part (PCRtA) were isolated in equal dimensions on lesion and contralateral sides for quantification of GFP+ microglia using the Imaris software.

(b) Quantification of GFP+ microglial cells in contralateral (black) and injured (red) facial nuclei from onset (1 to 2d) to peak (7 and 14d) to resolution of injury (60d) in 8-14 weeks old female Cx3cr1 GFP/+ mice.

(c) Representative confocal images of microglia (GFP, green) with DAPI nuclear counterstain (blue) in matched facial nuclei during the time course of injury.

(d) Kinetics of microglial proliferation indicated by Ki67 immunohistochemistry.

(e) Representative confocal images for d. Microglia took on less ramified and more amoeboid morphology at 2 d after the lesion. GFP+ microglia (green), Ki67 (magenta) and DAPI (blue).

(f) Kinetics of microglial activation indicated by MHC class II immunohistochemistry.

(g) Representative confocal images for f. Microglia were highly activated and assumed a rod-like or amoeboid morphology 7d following nerve transection. GFP+ microglia (green), MHC class II (magenta) and DAPI (blue).

Data are represented as mean ± SEM in b, d and f. n = 4 (1 d), 5 (2 d), 6 (7 d), 5 (14 d) and 7 (60 d) mice pooled from five experiments, 3-6 sections each. Two-way ANOVA, * P = 0.0358 in b, ** P = 0.0036 in b, 0.00110 in f, *** P < 0.001 in b, d and f. Scale bars, 50 μm in c, 20 μm in e and g.

Supplementary Figure 4 Distribution of EdU+ GFP+ microglial cells outside of facial nuclei at 7 and 60 d after lesion.

(a) Quantification of EdU+ GFP+ microglial cells external of the facial nuclei (in female Cx3cr1 GFP/+ mice injured at 8-14 weeks old) at peak of microgliosis (7 d) and recovery (60 d). Each black and red symbol represents one paired count. Data are pooled from two experiments and shown as mean ± SEM. n = 8 (7 d) and 9 (60 d) mice. Two-way ANOVA, time point *** P = 0.001, lesion *** P < 0.0001.

(b) Representative overview images for a showing lesion and contralateral pons. Dotted lines demarcate the facial nuclei. High magnification insets show EdU+ GFP+ microglial cells in the intermediate reticular nucleus. Scale bars, 500 μm, 50 μm in inset.

Supplementary Figure 5 Graphical abstract of context-dependent microglial renewal and clonal expansion.

Microglial renewal occurs randomly and steadily throughout the healthy CNS with regional differences in rate. The onset of neurodegeneration triggers rapid clonal expansion and activation of microglial cells. During recovery the altered microglial network gradually returns to homeostatic cell density and a non-activated state. Excess microglia associated with disease are eliminated via cell egress and local apoptotic cell death to regain steady state microglial interfaces in the CNS.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tay, T., Mai, D., Dautzenberg, J. et al. A new fate mapping system reveals context-dependent random or clonal expansion of microglia.Nat Neurosci 20, 793–803 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4547

Download citation