Linking DNA methylation and histone modification: patterns and paradigms (original) (raw)
Kafri, T. et al. Developmental pattern of gene-specific DNA methylation in the mouse embryo and germline. Genes Dev.6, 705–714 (1992). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Monk, M., Boubelik, M. & Lehnert, S. Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. Development99, 371–382 (1987). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A. & Li, E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell99, 247–257 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Brandeis, M. et al. Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature371, 435–438 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Siegfried, Z. et al. DNA methylation represses transcription in vivo. Nature Genet.22, 203–206 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Macleod, D., Charlton, J., Mullins, J. & Bird, A. P. Sp1 sites in the mouse aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. Genes Dev.8, 2282–2292 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Frank, D. et al. Demethylation of CpG islands in embryonic cells. Nature351, 239–241 (1991). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ooi, S. K. et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature448, 714–717 (2007). References 8 and 10 show that DNMT3L interacts with unmethylated H3K4 through its N terminus and with DNMT3A through its C terminus, thus linking the DNA methylation machinery to the modification state of histone tails. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Guenther, M. G., Levine, S. S., Boyer, L. A., Jaenisch, R. & Young, R. A. A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell130, 77–88 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jia, D., Jurkowska, R. Z., Zhang, X., Jeltsch, A. & Cheng, X. Structure of Dnmt3a bound to Dnmt3L suggests a model for de novo DNA methylation. Nature449, 248–251 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bourc'his, D., Xu, G. L., Lin, C. S., Bollman, B. & Bestor, T. H. Dnmt3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science294, 2536–2539 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Weber, M. et al. Distribution, silencing potential and evolutionary impact of promoter DNA methylation in the human genome. Nature Genet.39, 457–466 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Mohn, F. et al. Lineage-specific polycomb targets and de novo DNA methylation define restriction and potential of neuronal progenitors. Mol. Cell30, 755–766 (2008). References 13 and 14 present genome-wide DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated stem cells. They show a link between DNA methylation patterns and histone methylation patterns. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature454, 766–770 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Okitsu, C. Y. & Hsieh, C. L. DNA methylation dictates histone H3K4 methylation. Mol. Cell. Biol.27, 2746–2757 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Weber, M. et al. Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells. Nature Genet.37, 853–862 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gidekel, S. & Bergman, Y. A unique developmental pattern of Oct-3/4 DNA methylation is controlled by a cis-demodification element. J. Biol. Chem.277, 34521–34530 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sylvester, I. & Scholer, H. R. Regulation of the Oct-4 gene by nuclear receptors. Nucleic Acids Res.22, 901–911 (1994). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ben-Shushan, E., Sharir, H., Pikarsky, E. & Bergman, Y. A dynamic balance between ARP-1/COUP-TFII, EAR-3/COUP-TFI, and retinoic acid receptor:retinoid X receptor heterodimers regulates Oct-3/4 expression in embryonal carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.15, 1034–1048 (1995). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, G. et al. Mouse germline restriction of Oct4 expression by germ cell nuclear factor. Dev. Cell1, 377–387 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Feldman, N. et al. G9a-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nature Cell Biol.8, 188–194 (2006). References 21 and 22 show that G9a inactivates early embryonic genes. Histone methylation is shown to block target gene reactivation in the absence of repressors, whereas DNA methylation prevents reprogramming. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Epsztejn-Litman, S. et al. De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9a prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 1176–1183 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Lehnertz, B. et al. Suv39h-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr. Biol.13, 1192–1200 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Fuks, F., Hurd, P. J., Deplus, R. & Kouzarides, T. The DNA methyltransferases associate with HP1 and the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res.31, 2305–2312 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sugiyama, T., Cam, H., Verdel, A., Moazed, D. & Grewal, S. I. RNA-dependent RNA polymerase is an essential component of a self-enforcing loop coupling heterochromatin assembly to siRNA production. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102, 152–157 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kanellopoulou, C. et al. Dicer-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells are defective in differentiation and centromeric silencing. Genes Dev.19, 489–501 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fukagawa, T. et al. Dicer is essential for formation of the heterochromatin structure in vertebrate cells. Nature Cell Biol.6, 784–791 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Malinina, L. Possible involvement of the RNAi pathway in trinucleotide repeat expansion diseases. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.23, 233–235 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Pandey, R. R. et al. Kcnq1ot1 antisense noncoding RNA mediates lineage-specific transcriptional silencing through chromatin-level regulation. Mol. Cell32, 232–246 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, J., Sun, B. K., Erwin, J. A., Song, J. J. & Lee, J. T. Polycomb proteins targeted by a short repeat RNA to the mouse X chromosome. Science322, 750–756 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Nagano, T. et al. The Air noncoding RNA epigenetically silences transcription by targeting G9a to chromatin. Science322, 1717–1720 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tamaru, H. & Selker, E. U. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls DNA methylation in Neurospora crassa. Nature414, 277–283 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jackson, J. P., Lindroth, A. M., Cao, X. & Jacobsen, S. E. Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature416, 556–560 (2002). References 32 and 33 were the first studies to report crosstalk between histone methylation and DNA methylation inN. crassaandA. thaliana . CASPubMed Google Scholar
Osipovich, O. et al. Targeted inhibition of V(D)J recombination by a histone methyltransferase. Nature Immunol.5, 309–316 (2004). CAS Google Scholar
Carlson, L. L., Page, A. W. & Bestor, T. H. Properties and localization of DNA methyltransferase in preimplantation mouse embryos: implications for genomic imprinting. Genes Dev.6, 2536–2541 (1992). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Leonhardt, H., Page, A. W., Weier, H. U. & Bestor, T. H. A targeting sequence directs DNA methyltransferase to sites of DNA replication in mammalian nuclei. Cell71, 865–873 (1992). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bostick, M. et al. UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Science317, 1760–1764 (2007). References 37–39 show that UHRF1 contains an SRA domain that binds to hemimethylated CG sites and forms a complex with DNMT1, thus mediating epigenetic inheritance of DNA methylation. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sharif, J. et al. The SRA protein Np95 mediates epigenetic inheritance by recruiting Dnmt1 to methylated DNA. Nature450, 908–912 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Achour, M. et al. The interaction of the SRA domain of ICBP90 with a novel domain of DNMT1 is involved in the regulation of VEGF gene expression. Oncogene27, 2187–2197 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. M. & Bird, A. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nature Rev. Genet.9, 465–476 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Weber, M. & Schubeler, D. Genomic patterns of DNA methylation: targets and function of an epigenetic mark. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.19, 273–280 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Eden, S., Hashimshony, T., Keshet, I., Thorne, A. W. & Cedar, H. DNA methylation models histone acetylation. Nature394, 842–843 (1998). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hashimshony, T., Zhang, J., Keshet, I., Bustin, M. & Cedar, H. The role of DNA methylation in setting up chromatin structure during development. Nature Genet.34, 187–192 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Nan, X. et al. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature393, 386–389 (1998). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jones, P. L. et al. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature Genet.19, 187–191 (1998). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Esteve, P. O. et al. Direct interaction between DNMT1 and G9a coordinates DNA and histone methylation during replication. Genes Dev.20, 3089–3103 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lande-Diner, L. et al. Role of DNA methylation in stable gene repression. J. Biol. Chem.282, 12194–12200 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zilberman, D., Coleman-Derr, D., Ballinger, T. & Henikoff, S. Histone H2A.Z and DNA methylation are mutually antagonistic chromatin marks. Nature456, 125–129 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tachibana, M., Matsumura, Y., Fukuda, M., Kimura, H. & Shinkai, Y. G9a/GLP complexes independently mediate H3K9 and DNA methylation to silence transcription. EMBO J.27, 2681–2690 (2008). References 49 and 50 show that G9a promotes DNA methylation of retrotransposons and a number of genes in embryonic stem cells independently of its catalytic activity. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dong, K. B. et al. DNA methylation in ES cells requires the lysine methyltransferase G9a but not its catalytic activity. EMBO J.27, 2691–2701 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Vire, E. et al. The Polycomb group protein EZH2 directly controls DNA methylation. Nature439, 871–874 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Li, H. et al. The histone methyltransferase SETDB1 and the DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A interact directly and localize to promoters silenced in cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem.281, 19489–19500 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Smallwood, A., Esteve, P. O., Pradhan, S. & Carey, M. Functional cooperation between HP1 and DNMT1 mediates gene silencing. Genes Dev.21, 1169–1178 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Freitag, M., Hickey, P. C., Khlafallah, T. K., Read, N. D. & Selker, E. U. HP1 is essential for DNA methylation in Neurospora. Mol. Cell13, 427–434 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lande-Diner, L. & Cedar, H. Silence of the genes — mechanisms of long-term repression. Nature Rev. Genet.6, 648–654 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Schoenherr, C. J. & Anderson, D. J. The neuron-restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron-specific genes. Science267, 1360–1363 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Franke, A. et al. Polycomb and polyhomeotic are constituents of a multimeric protein complex in chromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. EMBO J.11, 2941–2950 (1992). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature441, 349–353 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, T. I. et al. Control of developmental regulators by polycomb in human embryonic stem cells. Cell125, 301–313 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hansen, K. H. et al. A model for transmission of the H3K27me3 epigenetic mark. Nature Cell Biol.10, 1291–1300 (2008). The authors suggest a mechanism by which H3K27me3 is propagated during the cell division cycle. Once H3K27me3 is established it recruits the PRC2 complex, leading to methylation of histone H3 on the newly synthesized DNA. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature452, 877–881 (2008). This study examines the erasure of parental imprints in mouse primordial germ cells during embryogenesis. The data suggest that DNA demethylation occurs prior to histone replacement, thus supporting a repair model for demethylation. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Schwartz, Y. B. & Pirrotta, V. Polycomb complexes and epigenetic states. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.20, 266–273 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Pietersen, A. M. & van Lohuizen, M. Stem cell regulation by polycomb repressors: postponing commitment. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.20, 201–207 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell125, 315–326 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature448, 553–560 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pan, G. et al. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell1, 299–312 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, X. D. et al. Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell1, 286–298 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell129, 823–837 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hershko, A. Y., Kafri, T., Fainsod, A. & Razin, A. Methylation of HoxA5 and HoxB5 and its relevance to expression during mouse development. Gene302, 65–72 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Payer, B. & Lee, J. T. X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Annu. Rev. Genet.42, 733–772 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lock, L. F., Takagi, N. & Martin, G. R. Methylation of the Hprt gene on the inactive X occurs after chromosome inactivation. Cell48, 39–46 (1987). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Samollow, P. B., Robinson, E. S., Ford, A. L. & Vandeberg, J. L. Developmental progression of Gpd expression from the inactive X chromosome of the virginia opossum. Dev. Genet.16, 367–378 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Migeon, B. R., Jan de Beur, S. & Axelman, J. Frequent derepression of G6PD and HPRT on the marsupial inactive X chromosome associated with cell proliferation in vitro. Exp. Cell Res.182, 597–609 (1989). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gautsch, J. W. & Wilson, M. C. Delayed de novo methylation in teratocarcinoma suggests additional tissue-specific mechanisms for controlling gene expression. Nature301, 32–37 (1983). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126, 663–676 (2006). This is the first report showing the generation of iPS cells by introduction of four transcription factor genes into somatic cells. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell1, 55–70 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wernig, M. et al. In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state. Nature448, 318–324 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Welstead, G. G., Schorderet, P. & Boyer, L. A. The reprogramming language of pluripotency. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.18, 123–129 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature454, 49–55 (2008). This paper shows that partially reprogrammed cell lines have DNA hypermethylation at pluripotency-related loci. This suggests that DNA demethylation is an inefficient step accomplished late in the transition to pluripotency. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, Y. et al. A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell2, 525–528 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Shi, Y. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell Stem Cell3, 568–574 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ma, D. K., Chiang, C. H., Ponnusamy, K., Ming, G. L. & Song, H. G9a and Jhdm2a regulate embryonic stem cell fusion-induced reprogramming of adult neural stem cells. Stem Cells26, 2131–2141 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
De Marzo, A. M. et al. Abnormal regulation of DNA methyltransferase expression during colorectal carcinogenesis. Cancer Res.59, 3855–3860 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Robertson, K. D. et al. The human DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) 1, 3a and 3b: coordinate mRNA expression in normal tissues and overexpression in tumors. Nucleic Acids Res.27, 2291–2298 (1999). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Keshet, I. et al. Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells. Nature Genet.38, 149–153 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Y. et al. Polycomb mediated histone H3(K27) methylation pre-marks genes for de novo methylation in cancer. Nature Genet.39, 232–236 (2007). References 87–89 show that in cancer cells a large number of CpG islands marked by H3K27me3 undergode novomethylation, indicating that Polycomb-directedde novomethylation might play an important part in carcinogenesis. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ohm, J. E. et al. A stem cell-like chromatin pattern may predispose tumor suppressor genes to DNA hypermethylation and heritable silencing. Nature Genet.39, 237–242 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Widschwendter, M. et al. Epigenetic stem cell signature in cancer. Nature Genet.39, 157–158 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Varambally, S. et al. The polycomb group protein EZH2 is involved in progression of prostate cancer. Nature419, 624–629 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Varambally, S. et al. Genomic loss of microRNA-101 leads to overexpression of histone methyltransferase EZH2 in cancer. Science322, 1695–1699 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Benetti, R. et al. A mammalian microRNA cluster controls DNA methylation and telomere recombination via Rbl2-dependent regulation of DNA methyltransferases. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 268–279 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Sinkkonen, L. et al. MicroRNAs control de novo DNA methylation through regulation of transcriptional repressors in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 259–267 (2008). CAS Google Scholar
Gal-Yam, E. N. et al. Frequent switching of Polycomb repressive marks and DNA hypermethylation in the PC3 prostate cancer cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 12979–12984 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
McGarvey, K. M., Greene, E., Fahrner, J. A., Jenuwein, T. & Baylin, S. B. DNA methylation and complete transcriptional silencing of cancer genes persist after depletion of EZH2. Cancer Res.67, 5097–5102 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lindroth, A. M. et al. Antagonism between DNA and H3K27 methylation at the imprinted Rasgrf1 locus. PLoS Genet.4, e1000145 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhao, Q. et al. PRMT5-mediated methylation of histone H4R3 recruits DNMT3A, coupling histone and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.16, 304–311 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. The lysine demethylase LSD1 (KDM1) is required for maintenance of global DNA methylation. Nature Genet.41, 125–129 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Goldmit, M. et al. Epigenetic ontogeny of the κ locus during B cell development. Nature Immunol.6, 198–203 (2005). CAS Google Scholar
Loh, Y. H., Zhang, W., Chen, X., George, J. & Ng, H. H. Jmjd1a and Jmjd2c histone H3 Lys 9 demethylases regulate self-renewal in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev.21, 2545–2557 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lan, F., Nottke, A. C. & Shi, Y. Mechanisms involved in the regulation of histone lysine demethylases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.20, 316–325 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Agger, K., Christensen, J., Cloos, P. A. & Helin, K. The emerging functions of histone demethylases. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.18, 159–168 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Paroush, Z., Keshet, I., Yisraeli, J. & Cedar, H. Dynamics of demethylation and activation of the α actin gene in myoblasts. Cell63, 1229–1237 (1990). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Barreto, G. et al. Gadd45a promotes epigenetic gene activation by repair-mediated DNA demethylation. Nature445, 671–675 (2007). References 104, 105, 107 and 108 show that active DNA demethylation might be accomplished through DNA repair promoted by GADD45. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Rai, K. et al. DNA Demethylation in zebrafish involves the coupling of a deaminase, a glycosylase, and Gadd45. Cell135, 1201–1212 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Weiss, A., Keshet, I., Razin, A. & Cedar, H. DNA demethylation in vitro: involvement of RNA. Cell86, 709–718 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Schmmitz, K. M. et al. TAF12 recruits Gadd45a and the nucleotide excision repair complex to the promoter of rRNA genes leading to active DNA demethylation. Mol. Cell33, 344–353 (2009). Google Scholar
Ma, D. K. et al. Neuronal sctivity-induced Gadd45b promotes epigenetic DNA demethylation and adult neurogenesis. Science323, 1074–1077 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar