Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis (original) (raw)
Gonzalez-Gaitan, M. Signal dispersal and transduction through the endocytic pathway. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.4, 213–224 (2003). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Tabata, T. & Takei, Y. Morphogens, their identification and regulation. Development131, 703–712 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tree, D. R., Ma, D. & Axelrod, J. D. A three-tiered mechanism for regulation of planar cell polarity. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol.13, 217–224 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Steinberg, M. S. & Poole, T. J. in Cell Behavior (eds Bellairs, R. & Curtis, A. S. G.) 583–607 (Cambidge University Press, Cambridge, 1982). Google Scholar
Thoumine, O. & Ott, A. Time scale dependent viscoelastic and contractile regimes in fibroblasts probed by microplate manipulation. J. Cell Sci.110, 2109–2116 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Forgacs, G., Foty, R. A., Shafrir, Y. & Steinberg, M. S. Viscoelastic properties of living embryonic tissues: a quantitative study. Biophys. J.74, 2227–2234 (1998). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Thomson, D. W. On Growth and Form (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1961). Google Scholar
Forgacs, G. & Newman, S. A. Biological Physics of the Developing Embryo (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005). Book Google Scholar
Israelachvili, J. Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic Press, New York, 1992). Google Scholar
Beysens, D. A., Forgacs, G. & Glazier, J. A. Cell sorting is analogous to phase ordering in fluids. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97, 9467–9471 (2000). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Townes, P. L. & Holtfreter, J. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J. Exp. Zool.128, 53–120 (1955). Article Google Scholar
Steinberg, M. S. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. Science141, 401–408 (1963). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Foty, R. A., Pfleger, C. M., Forgacs, G. & Steinberg, M. S. Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behavior. Development122, 1611–1620 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Foty, R. A. & Steinberg, M. S. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev. Biol.278, 255–263 (2005). Shows that the surface tension of a group of cells, which express different levels of transfected cadherins on their surfaces, is proportional to the cadherin concentration. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hayashi, T. & Carthew, R. W. Surface mechanics mediate pattern formation in the developing retina. Nature431, 647–652 (2004). Shows that the spatial organization and geometry of cone cells in the fly retina obey the same physical principles that govern the shapes of groups of soap bubbles. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Graner, F. & Glazier, J. A. Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2013–2016 (1992). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mombach, J. C., Glazier, J. A., Raphael, R. C. & Zajac, M. Quantitative comparison between differential adhesion models and cell sorting in the presence and absence of fluctuations. Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 2244–2247 (1995). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Niessen, C. M. & Gumbiner, B. M. Cadherin-mediated cell sorting not determined by binding or adhesion specificity. J. Cell Biol.156, 389–399 (2002). Provides evidence that cell sorting by cadherin adhesion is not achieved by selective homophilic interactions of cadherins. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Prakasam, A. K., Maruthamuthu, V. & Leckband, D. E. Similarities between heterophilic and homophilic cadherin adhesion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA103, 15434–15439 (2006). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Drees, F., Pokutta, S., Yamada, S., Nelson, W. J. & Weis, W. I. α-catenin is a molecular switch that binds E-cadherin–β-catenin and regulates actin-filament assembly. Cell123, 903–915 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Steinberg, M. S. & Takeichi, M. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA91, 206–209 (1994). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Godt, D. & Tepass, U. Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion. Nature395, 387–391 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Reyes, A. & St Johnston, D. Patterning of the follicle cell epithelium along the anterior–posterior axis during Drosophila oogenesis. Development125, 2837–2846 (1998). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Milan, M., Weihe, U., Perez, L. & Cohen, S. M. The LRR proteins capricious and Tartan mediate cell interactions during DV boundary formation in the Drosophila wing. Cell106, 785–794 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dahmann, C. & Basler, K. Opposing transcriptional outputs of Hedgehog signaling and engrailed control compartmental cell sorting at the Drosophila A/P boundary. Cell100, 411–422 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tsai, M. A., Frank, R. S. & Waugh, R. E. Passive mechanical behavior of human neutrophils: effect of cytochalasin B. Biophys. J.66, 2166–2172 (1994). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sheetz, M. P. Cell control by membrane–cytoskeleton adhesion. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.2, 392–396 (2001). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Evans, E. & Yeung, A. Apparent viscosity and cortical tension of blood granulocytes determined by micropipet aspiration. Biophys. J.56, 151–160 (1989). Shows on the basis of single-cell micropipet aspiration that the concept of cortical tension can account for cell shape. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Burton, K. & Taylor, D. L. Traction forces of cytokinesis measured with optically modified elastic substrata. Nature385, 450–454 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Paluch, E., Piel, M., Prost, J., Bornens, M. & Sykes, C. Cortical actomyosin breakage triggers shape oscillations in cells and cell fragments. Biophys. J.89, 724–733 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Humphrey, D., Duggan, C., Saha, D., Smith, D. & Kas, J. Active fluidization of polymer networks through molecular motors. Nature416, 413–416 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Le Goff, L., Amblard, F. & Furst, E. M. Motor-driven dynamics in actin–myosin networks. Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 181011–181014 (2002). Google Scholar
Murthy, K. & Wadsworth, P. Myosin-II-dependent localization and dynamics of F-actin during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol.15, 724–731 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Urven, L. E., Yabe, T. & Pelegri, F. A role for non-muscle myosin II function in furrow maturation in the early zebrafish embryo. J. Cell Sci.119, 4342–4352 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hickson, G. R., Echard, A. & O'Farrell, P. H. Rho-kinase controls cell shape changes during cytokinesis. Curr. Biol.16, 359–370 (2006). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Munro, E., Nance, J. & Priess, J. R. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior–posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell7, 413–424 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hird, S. N. & White, J. G. Cortical and cytoplasmic flow polarity in early embryonic cells of Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Cell Biol.121, 1343–1355 (1993). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Plateau, J. Statique Expérimentale et Théorique des Liquides Soumis aux Seules Forces Moléculaires (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1873). Google Scholar
Gibson, M. C., Patel, A. B., Nagpal, R. & Perrimon, N. The emergence of geometric order in proliferating metazoan epithelia. Nature442, 1038–1041 (2006). Provides the basic principles that underlie the emergence of geometric order in proliferating epithelia. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
De Vries, W. N. et al. Maternal β-catenin and E-cadherin in mouse development. Development131, 4435–4445 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jamora, C. & Fuchs, E. Intercellular adhesion, signalling and the cytoskeleton. Nature Cell Biol.4, E101–E108 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bershadsky, A. Magic touch: how does cell–cell adhesion trigger actin assembly? Trends Cell Biol.14, 589–593 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gates, J. & Peifer, M. Can 1000 reviews be wrong? Actin, α-catenin, and adherens junctions. Cell123, 769–772 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Yamada, S., Pokutta, S., Drees, F., Weis, W. I. & Nelson, W. J. Deconstructing the cadherin–catenin–actin complex. Cell123, 889–901 (2005). Together with reference 20, demonstrates that the E-cadherin–β-catenin-α-catenin ternary complex does not bind directly to actin filaments. This leads to a re-evaluation of the role of actin in stabilization of E-cadherin homophilic complexes. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pilot, F., Philippe, J. M., Lemmers, C. & Lecuit, T. Spatial control of actin organization at adherens junctions by a synaptotagmin-like protein Btsz. Nature442, 580–584 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ehrlich, J. S., Hansen, M. D. & Nelson, W. J. Spatio-temporal regulation of Rac1 localization and lamellipodia dynamics during epithelial cell–cell adhesion. Dev. Cell3, 259–270 (2002). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Vaezi, A., Bauer, C., Vasioukhin, V. & Fuchs, E. Actin cable dynamics and Rho/Rock orchestrate a polarized cytoskeletal architecture in the early steps of assembling a stratified epithelium. Dev. Cell3, 367–381 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dawes-Hoang, R. E. et al. Folded gastrulation, cell shape change and the control of myosin localization. Development132, 4165–4178 (2005). Shows that the apically secreted FOG protein causes apical constriction of epithelial cells inD. melanogastergastrulation through the upregulation of an acto-myosin-II network tethered to the plasma membrane through the adherens junctions. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Munoz, J. J., Barrett, K. & Miodownik, M. A deformation gradient decomposition method for the analysis of the mechanics of morphogenesis. J. Biomech. 1372–1380 (2006).
Wei, L. et al. Rho kinases play an obligatory role in vertebrate embryonic organogenesis. Development128, 2953–2962 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hacker, U. & Perrimon, N. DRhoGEF2 encodes a member of the Dbl family of oncogenes and controls cell shape changes during gastrulation in Drosophila. Genes Dev.12, 274–284 (1998). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Nikolaidou, K. K. & Barrett, K. A Rho GTPase signaling pathway is used reiteratively in epithelial folding and potentially selects the outcome of Rho activation. Curr. Biol.14, 1822–1826 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kolsch, V., Seher, T., Fernandez-Ballester, G. J., Serrano, L. & Leptin, M. Control of Drosophila gastrulation by apical localization of adherens junctions and RhoGEF2. Science315, 384–386 (2007). Identifies the transmembrane protein T48 that promotesD. melanogastermesoderm invagination by recruiting the cytoskeletal regulator RhoGEF2 to the sites of apical constriction. PubMed Google Scholar
Barrett, K., Leptin, M. & Settleman, J. The Rho GTPase and a putative RhoGEF mediate a signaling pathway for the cell shape changes in Drosophila gastrulation. Cell91, 905–915 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brouns, M. R., Matheson, S. F. & Settleman, J. p190 RhoGAP is the principal Src substrate in brain and regulates axon outgrowth, guidance and fasciculation. Nature Cell Biol.3, 361–367 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Haigo, S. L., Hildebrand, J. D., Harland, R. M. & Wallingford, J. B. Shroom induces apical constriction and is required for hingepoint formation during neural tube closure. Curr. Biol.13, 2125–2137 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Asha, H., de Ruiter, N. D., Wang, M. G. & Hariharan, I. K. The Rap1 GTPase functions as a regulator of morphogenesis in vivo. EMBO J.18, 605–615 (1999). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rogers, S. L., Wiedemann, U., Hacker, U., Turck, C. & Vale, R. D. Drosophila RhoGEF2 associates with microtubule plus ends in an EB1-dependent manner. Curr. Biol.14, 1827–1833 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hart, M. J. et al. Direct stimulation of the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of p115 RhoGEF by Gα13. Science280, 2112–2114 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kwan, K. M. & Kirschner, M. W. A microtubule-binding Rho-GEF controls cell morphology during convergent extension of Xenopus laevis. Development132, 4599–4610 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lin, F. et al. Essential roles of Gα12/13 signaling in distinct cell behaviors driving zebrafish convergence and extension gastrulation movements. J. Cell Biol.169, 777–787 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fox, D. T. & Peifer, M. Abelson kinase (Abl) and RhoGEF2 regulate actin organization during cell constriction in Drosophila. Development134, 567–578 (2007). Identifies the Abl kinase as a novel regulator of ventral furrow invagination through the regulation of actin organization. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Menzies, A. S. et al. Mena and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein are required for multiple actin-dependent processes that shape the vertebrate nervous system. J. Neurosci.24, 8029–8038 (2004). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hildebrand, J. D. & Soriano, P. Shroom, a PDZ domain-containing actin-binding protein, is required for neural tube morphogenesis in mice. Cell99, 485–497 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lanier, L. M. et al. Mena is required for neurulation and commissure formation. Neuron22, 313–325 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brouns, M. R. et al. The adhesion signaling molecule p190 RhoGAP is required for morphogenetic processes in neural development. Development127, 4891–4903 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Koleske, A. J. et al. Essential roles for the Abl and Arg tyrosine kinases in neurulation. Neuron21, 1259–1272 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hildebrand, J. D. Shroom regulates epithelial cell shape via the apical positioning of an actomyosin network. J. Cell Sci.118, 5191–5203 (2005). Describes how the actin-binding protein Shroom controls epithelial cell shape by regulating the formation of an acto-myosin network in the apical junctional region. This is a unique analysis of vertebrate apical constriction at the cellular level. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Guha, M., Zhou, M. & Wang, Y. L. Cortical actin turnover during cytokinesis requires myosin II. Curr. Biol.15, 732–736 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wei, S. Y. et al. Echinoid is a component of adherens junctions that cooperates with DE-cadherin to mediate cell adhesion. Dev. Cell8, 493–504 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Laplante, C. & Nilson, L. A. Differential expression of the adhesion molecule Echinoid drives epithelial morphogenesis in Drosophila. Development133, 3255–3264 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Irvine, K. D. & Wieschaus, E. Cell intercalation during Drosophila germband extension and its regulation by pair-rule segmentation genes. Development120, 827–841 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bertet, C., Sulak, L. & Lecuit, T. Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation. Nature429, 667–671 (2004). Demonstrates that local forces mediated by myosin-II at cell junctions and consequent cell-shape changes are responsible for cell intercalation during germband elongation inD. melanogaster . ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zallen, J. A. & Wieschaus, E. Patterned gene expression directs bipolar planar polarity in Drosophila. Dev Cell6, 343–355 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ribeiro, C., Ebner, A. & Affolter, M. In vivo imaging reveals different cellular functions for FGF and Dpp signaling in tracheal branching morphogenesis. Dev. Cell2, 677–683 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ribeiro, C., Neumann, M. & Affolter, M. Genetic control of cell intercalation during tracheal morphogenesis in Drosophila. Curr. Biol.14, 2197–2207 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Harris, T. J. & Peifer, M. Adherens junction-dependent and -independent steps in the establishment of epithelial cell polarity in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol.167, 135–147 (2004). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Blankenship, J. T., Backovic, S. T., Sanny, J. S., Weitz, O. & Zallen, J. A. Multicellular rosette formation links planar cell polarity to tissue morphogenesis. Dev. Cell11, 459–470 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jung, A. C., Ribeiro, C., Michaut, L., Certa, U. & Affolter, M. Polychaetoid/ZO-1 is required for cell specification and rearrangement during Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis. Curr. Biol.16, 1224–1231 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Major, R. J. & Irvine, K. D. Localization and requirement for myosin II at the dorsal–ventral compartment boundary of the Drosophila wing. Dev. Dyn.235, 3051–3058 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Major, R. J. & Irvine, K. D. Influence of Notch on dorsoventral compartmentalization and actin organization in the Drosophila wing. Development132, 3823–3833 (2005). References 84 and 85 characterize the polarized regulation of cell surface properties at a compartment boundary, in particular the formation of an acto-myosin network required for cell segregation. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Franke, J. D., Montague, R. A. & Kiehart, D. P. Nonmuscle myosin II generates forces that transmit tension and drive contraction in multiple tissues during dorsal closure. Curr. Biol.15, 2208–2221 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ready, D. F., Hanson, T. E. & Benzer, S. Development of the Drosophila retina, a neurocrystalline lattice. Dev. Biol.53, 217–240 (1976). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bao, S. & Cagan, R. Preferential adhesion mediated by Hibris and Roughest regulates morphogenesis and patterning in the Drosophila eye. Dev. Cell8, 925–935 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zallen, J. A. & Zallen, R. Cell-pattern disordering during convergent extension in Drosophila. J. Phys. Condens. Matter16, S5073–S5080 (2004). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Classen, A. K., Anderson, K. I., Marois, E. & Eaton, S. Hexagonal packing of Drosophila wing epithelial cells by the planar cell polarity pathway. Dev. Cell9, 805–817 (2005). Shows how the geometrical ordering of epithelial cells that accompanies the establishment of planar cell polarity is controlled by E-cadherin trafficking. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Knox, A. L. & Brown, N. H. Rap1 GTPase regulation of adherens junction positioning and cell adhesion. Science295, 1285–1288 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Leckband, D. & Prakasam, A. Mechanism and dynamics of cadherin adhesion. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng.8, 259–287 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kiecker, C. & Lumsden, A. Compartments and their boundaries in vertebrate brain development. Nature Rev. Neurosci.6, 553–564 (2005). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Shen, J. & Dahmann, C. The role of Dpp signaling in maintaining the Drosophila anteroposterior compartment boundary. Dev. Biol.279, 31–43 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rauskolb, C., Correia, T. & Irvine, K. D. Fringe-dependent separation of dorsal and ventral cells in the Drosophila wing. Nature401, 476–480 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Odell, G. M., Oster, G., Alberch, P. & Burnside, B. The mechanical basis of morphogenesis. I. Epithelial folding and invagination. Dev. Biol.85, 446–462 (1981). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hardin, J. & Keller, R. The behaviour and function of bottle cells during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. Development103, 211–230 (1988). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kimberly, E. L. & Hardin, J. Bottle cells are required for the initiation of primary invagination in the sea urchin embryo. Dev. Biol.204, 235–250 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Schoenwolf, G. C. & Franks, M. V. Quantitative analyses of changes in cell shapes during bending of the avian neural plate. Dev. Biol.105, 257–272 (1984). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kam, Z., Minden, J. S., Agard, D. A., Sedat, J. W. & Leptin, M. Drosophila gastrulation: analysis of cell shape changes in living embryos by three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy. Development112, 365–370 (1991). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sweeton, D., Parks, S., Costa, M. & Wieschaus, E. Gastrulation in Drosophila: the formation of the ventral furrow and posterior midgut invaginations. Development112, 775–789 (1991). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, J. Y. et al. Wnt/Frizzled signaling controls C. elegans gastrulation by activating actomyosin contractility. Curr. Biol.16, 1986–1997 (2006). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Anstrom, J. A. Microfilaments, cell shape changes, and the formation of primary mesenchyme in sea urchin embryos. J. Exp. Zool.264, 312–322 (1992). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Davidson, L. A., Koehl, M. A., Keller, R. & Oster, G. F. How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination. Development121, 2005–2018 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Keller, R. E. An experimental analysis of the role of bottle cells and the deep marginal zone in gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. J. Exp. Zool.216, 81–101 (1981). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Larsen, C. W., Hirst, E., Alexandre, C. & Vincent, J. P. Segment boundary formation in Drosophila embryos. Development130, 5625–5635 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brodu, V. & Casanova, J. The RhoGAP crossveinless-c links trachealess and EGFR signaling to cell shape remodeling in Drosophila tracheal invagination. Genes Dev.20, 1817–1828 (2006). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Myat, M. M., Isaac, D. D. & Andrew, D. J. Early genes required for salivary gland fate determination and morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Adv. Dent. Res.14, 89–98 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chandrasekaran, V. & Beckendorf, S. K. Tec29 controls actin remodeling and endoreplication during invagination of the Drosophila embryonic salivary glands. Development132, 3515–3524 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar