Measuring intolerance to mutation in human genetics (original) (raw)

• Blake, J. A., Bult, C. J., Eppig, J. T., Kadin, J. A. & Richardson, J. E. The Mouse Genome Database genotypes:phenotypes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D712–D719 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bartha, I., di Iulio, J., Venter, J. C. & Telenti, A. Human gene essentiality. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 51–62 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Eilbeck, K., Quinlan, A. & Yandell, M. Settling the score: variant prioritization and Mendelian disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 599–612 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Huang, N., Lee, I., Marcotte, E. M. & Hurles, M. E. Characterising and predicting haploinsufficiency in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001154 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Raybould, M. C., Birley, A. J. & Hultén, M. Molecular variation of the human elastin (ELN) gene in a normal human population. Ann. Hum. Genet. 59, 149–161 (1995).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wooster, R. et al. Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2. Nature 378, 789–792 (1995).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wagenseil, J. E. et al. The importance of elastin to aortic development in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 299, H257–H264 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Roy, R., Chun, J. & Powell, S. N. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 68–78 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Simons, Y. B., Bullaughey, K., Hudson, R. R. & Sella, G. A population genetic interpretation of GWAS findings for human quantitative traits. PLoS Biol. 16, e2002985 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Simmons, M. J. & Crow, J. F. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu. Rev. Genet. 11, 49–78 (1977).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Keightley, P. D. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 138, 1315–1322 (1994).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Deng, H. W. & Lynch, M. Estimation of deleterious-mutation parameters in natural populations. Genetics 144, 349–360 (1996).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Orr, H. A. Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 531–539 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mukai, T., Chigusa, S. I., Mettler, L. E. & Crow, J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72, 335–355 (1972).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Phadnis, N. & Fry, J. D. Widespread correlations between dominance and homozygous effects of mutations: implications for theories of dominance. Genetics 171, 385–392 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. F. & Whitlock, M. C. Inferences about the distribution of dominance drawn from yeast gene knockout data. Genetics 187, 553–566 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Williamson, S. H. et al. Simultaneous inference of selection and population growth from patterns of variation in the human genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7882–7887 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Eyre-Walker, A., Woolfit, M. & Phelps, T. The distribution of fitness effects of new deleterious amino acid mutations in humans. Genetics 173, 891–900 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Boyko, A. R. et al. Assessing the evolutionary impact of amino acid mutations in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000083 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Racimo, F. & Schraiber, J. G. Approximation to the distribution of fitness effects across functional categories in human segregating polymorphisms. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004697 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kim, B. Y., Huber, C. D. & Lohmueller, K. E. Inference of the distribution of selection coefficients for new nonsynonymous mutations using large samples. Genetics 206, 345–361 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Petrovski, S., Wang, Q., Heinzen, E. L., Allen, A. S. & Goldstein, D. B. Genic intolerance to functional variation and the interpretation of personal genomes. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003709 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Samocha, K. E. et al. A framework for the interpretation of de novo mutation in human disease. Nat. Genet. 46, 944–950 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Steinberg, J., Honti, F., Meader, S. & Webber, C. Haploinsufficiency predictions without study bias. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e101 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bartha, I. et al. The characteristics of heterozygous protein truncating variants in the human genome. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004647 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fadista, J., Oskolkov, N., Hansson, O. & Groop, L. LoFtool: a gene intolerance score based on loss-of-function variants in 60 706 individuals. Bioinformatics 33, 471–474 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lek, M. et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Blekhman, R. et al. Natural selection on genes that underlie human disease susceptibility. Curr. Biol. 18, 883–889 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lelieveld, S. H. et al. Meta-analysis of 2,104 trios provides support for 10 new genes for intellectual disability. Nat. Neurosci. 19, 1194–1196 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ruderfer, D. M. et al. Patterns of genic intolerance of rare copy number variation in 59,898 human exomes. Nat. Genet. 48, 1107–1111 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kosmicki, J. A. et al. Refining the role of de novo protein-truncating variants in neurodevelopmental disorders by using population reference samples. Nat. Genet. 49, 504–510 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Skraban, C. M. et al. WDR26 haploinsufficiency causes a recognizable syndrome of intellectual disability, seizures, abnormal gait, and distinctive facial features. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 139–148 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stankiewicz, P. et al. Haploinsufficiency of the chromatin remodeler BPTF causes syndromic developmental and speech delay, postnatal microcephaly, and dysmorphic features. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101, 503–515 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. T. et al. Integrated Bayesian analysis of rare exonic variants to identify risk genes for schizophrenia and neurodevelopmental disorders. Genome Med. 9, 114 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Zarrei, M. et al. De novo and rare inherited copy-number variations in the hemiplegic form of cerebral palsy. Genet. Med. 20, 172–180 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Heyne, H. O. et al. De novo variants in neurodevelopmental disorders with epilepsy. Nat. Genet. 50, 1048–1053 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zech, M. et al. Haploinsufficiency of KMT2B, encoding the lysine-specific histone methyltransferase 2b, results in early-onset generalized dystonia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 99, 1377–1387 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Haller, M., Mo, Q., Imamoto, A. & Lamb, D. J. Murine model indicates 22q11.2 signaling adaptor CRKL is a dosage-sensitive regulator of genitourinary development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4981–4986 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wang, J. et al. MARRVEL: integration of human and model organism genetic resources to facilitate functional annotation of the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 843–853 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Afzali, B. et al. BACH2 immunodeficiency illustrates an association between super-enhancers and haploinsufficiency. Nat. Immunol. 18, 813–823 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gosalia, N., Economides, A. N., Dewey, F. E. & Balasubramanian, S. MAPPIN: a method for annotating, predicting pathogenicity and mode of inheritance for nonsynonymous variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 10393–10402 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Haldane, J. B. S. A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection, part V: selection and mutation. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 23, 838–844 (1927).
  Article Google Scholar
• Haldane, J. B. S. The effect of variation of fitness. Am. Nat. 71, 337–349 (1937).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wright, S. The distribution of gene frequencies in populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 23, 307–320 (1937).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Crow, J.F. & Kimura, M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory (Harper & Row, 1970).
• Amorim, C. E. G. et al. The population genetics of human disease: the case of recessive, lethal mutations. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006915 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Schiffels, S. & Durbin, R. Inferring human population size and separation history from multiple genome sequences. Nat. Genet. 46, 919–925 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Weghorn, D. et al. Applicability of the mutation-selection balance model to population genetics of heterozygous protein-truncating variants in humans. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/433961v1 (2018).
• Cassa, C. A. et al. Estimating the selective effects of heterozygous protein-truncating variants from human exome data. Nat. Genet. 49, 806–810 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Samocha, K.E. et al. Regional missense constraint improves variant deleteriousness prediction. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/148353v1 (2017).
• Havrilla, J. M., Pedersen, B. S., Layer, R. M. & Quinlan, A. R. A map of constrained coding regions in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 51, 88–95 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Piel, F. B. et al. Global distribution of the sickle cell gene and geographical confirmation of the malaria hypothesis. Nat. Commun. 1, 104 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Gillespie, J.H. Population Genetics: a Concise Guide (JHU Press, 2004).
• Clark, A. G. Mutation-selection balance with multiple alleles. Genetica 102-103, 41–47 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Simons, Y. B., Turchin, M. C., Pritchard, J. K. & Sella, G. The deleterious mutation load is insensitive to recent population history. Nat. Genet. 46, 220–224 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, B. & Charlesworth, D. Elements of Evolutionary Genetics (W. H. Freeman, 2010).