Molecular melodies in high and low C (original) (raw)

• Mirsky, A. E. & Ris, H. The DNA content of animal cells and its evolutionary significance. J. Gen. Physiol. 34, 451–462 (1951).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. A. The genetic organization of chromosomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 5, 237–256 (1971).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bonner, J. et al. Functional organization of the mammalian genome. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 38, 303– 310 (1973).
  Article Google Scholar
• Davidson, E. H., Hough, B. R., Amenson, C. S. & Britten, R. J. General interspersion of repetitive with nonrepetitive sequence elements in the DNA of Xenopus. J. Mol. Biol. 77, 1–23 (1973).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• John, B. & Miklos, G. L. G. The Eukaryotic Genome in Development and Evolution 1–416 (Allen and Unwin, London, 1988).
  Book Google Scholar
• Dunham, I. et al. The DNA sequence of human chromosome 22. Nature 402, 489–495 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hattori, M. et al. The DNA sequence of human chromosome 21. Nature 405, 311–319 ( 2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cavalier–Smith, T. The Evolution of Genome Size (John Wiley, New York, 1985).
  Google Scholar
• Bliss, M. William Osler: A Life in Medicine (Oxford, New York, 1999).
  Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith, T. Nuclear volume control by nucleoskeletal DNA, selection for cell volume and cell growth rate, and the solution of the C-value paradox. J. Cell Sci. 34, 247–278 ( 1978).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vinogradov, A. E. Buffering: A possible passive-homeostasis role for redundant DNA. J. Theor. Biol. 193, 197–199 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ohno, S. in Evolution of Genetic Systems, Brookhaven Symp. Biol. (ed. Smith, H. H.) 366–370 (1972).
  Google Scholar
• Orgel, L. E. & Crick, F. H. C. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite . Nature 284, 604–607 (1980).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Doolittle, W. F. & Sapienza, C. Selfish genes, the phenotype paradigm and genome evolution. Nature 284, 601–603 (1980).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cavalier-Smith, T. & Beaton, M. J. The skeletal function of non-genic nuclear DNA: New evidence from ancient cell chimaeras . Genetica 106, 3–13 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Beaton, M. J. & Cavalier-Smith, T. Eukaryotic non-coding DNA is functional: evidence from the differential scaling of cryptomonad genomes . Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 2053– 2059 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bernardi, G. Isochores and the evolutionary genetics of vertebrates. Gene 241, 3–17 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lozovskaya, E. R., Nurminsky, D. I., Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D. L. Genome size as a mutation-selection-drift process. Genes Genet. Syst. 74, 201–207 ( 1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Laurent, A. M., Puechberty, J. & Roizes, G. Hypothesis: for the worst and for the best, L1Hs retrotransposons actively participate in the evolution of the human centromeric alphoid sequences . Chromosome Res. 7, 305– 317 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Csink, A. K. & Henikoff, S. Something from nothing: The evolution and utility of satellite repeats. Trends Genet. 14, 200–204 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Russo, C. A. M., Takezaki, N. & Nei, M. Molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Drosophilid species. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12, 391– 404 (1995).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Adams, M. D. et al. The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science 287, 2185–2195 ( 2000).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ogata, H., Fujibuchi, W. & Kanehisa, M. The size differences among mammalian introns are due to the accumulation of small deletions. FEBS Lett. 390, 99–103 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moriyama, E. N., Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D. L. Genome size and intron size in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 770–773 (1997).
  Article Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. & Long, M. Intron–exon structures of eukaryotic model organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3219–3228 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vinogradov, A. E. Intron–genome size relationship on a large evolutionary scale. J. Mol. Evol. 49, 376–384 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• SanMiguel, P. & Bennetzen, J. L. Evidence that a recent increase in maize genome size was caused by the massive amplification of intergene retrotransposons. Ann. Bot. 82, 37– 44 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D. L. High rate of DNA loss in the D. melanogaster and D. virilis species groups. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15, 293–302 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bennetzen, J. L. & Kellogg, E. A. Do plants have a one-way ticket to genomic obesity? Plant Cell 9, 1509–1514 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• San Miguel, P., Gaut, B. S., Tikhonov, A., Nakajima, Y. & Bennetzen, J. L. The paleontology of intergene retro-transposons of maize. Nature Genet. 20, 43–45 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. D. & Gloor, G. B. A role for the KP leucine zipper in regulating P element transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 141, 587–594 (1995).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lohe, A. R. & Hartl, D. L. Autoregulation of mariner transposase activity by overproduction and dominant-negative complementation . Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 549– 555 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stellwagen, A. E. & Craig, N. L. Mobile DNA elements: controlling transposition with ATP-dependent molecular switches. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 486–490 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Braam, L. A. M., Goryshin, I. Y. & Reznikoff, W. S. A mechanism for Tn_5_ inhibition: Carboxyl-terminal dimerization. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 86– 92 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sakai, J. S., Kleckner, N., Yang, X. & Guhathakurta, A. Tn 10 transpososome assembly involves a folded intermediate that must be unfolded for target capture and strand transfer. EMBO J. 19, 776–785 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bennetzen, J. L. Transposable element contributions to plant gene and genome evolution. Plant Mol. Biol. 42, 251–269 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ketting, R. F. & Plasterk, R. H. A. A genetic link between co-suppression and RNA interference in C. elegans. Nature 404, 296–298 ( 2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chaboissiert, M. C., Bucheton, A. & Finnegan, D. J. Copy number control of a transposable element, the I factor, a LINE-like element in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11781–11785 (1998).
  Article Google Scholar
• Birchler, J. A., Pal-Bhadra, M. & Bhadra, U. Less from more: cosuppression of transposable elements . Nature Genet. 21, 148– 149 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jensen, S., Gassama, M. P. & Heidmann, T. Cosuppression of I transposon activity in Drosophila by _I_-containing sense and antisense transgenes. Genetics 153, 1767–1774 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Casavant, N. C. et al. The end of the LINE?: Lack of recent L1 activity in a group of South American rodents. Genetics 154, 1809–1817 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Graur, D., Shuali, Y. & Li, W.-H. Deletions in processes pseudogenes accumulate faster in rodents than in humans. J. Mol. Evol. 28, 279–285 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Petrov, D. A., Lozovskaya, E. R. & Hartl, D. L. High intrinsic rate of DNA loss in Drosophila . Nature 384, 346–349 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D. L. Trash DNA is what gets thrown away: High rate of DNA loss in Drosophila. Gene 205 , 279–289 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wright, D. A. et al. Multiple non-LTR retrotransposons in the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 142, 569– 578 (1996).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Petrov, D. A., Sangster, T., Johnston, J. S., Hartl, D. L. & Shaw, K. L. Evidence for DNA loss as a determinant of genome size. Science 287, 1060– 1062 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Robertson, H. M. The large srh family of chemoreceptor genes in Caenorhabditis nematodes reveals processes of genome evolution involving large duplications and deletions and intron gains and losses. Genome Res. 10, 192–203 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bensasson, D., Petrov, D. A., Zhang, D. -X., Hartl, D. L. & Hewitt, G. M. Genomic gigantism: DNA loss is slow in mountain grasshoppers. Mol. Biol. Evol. (in the press).
• Charlesworth, B. The changing sizes of genes. Nature 384, 315–316 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Petrov, D. A. & Hartl, D. L. Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome. Heredity 91, 221–227 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kimura, M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 47, 713–719 ( 1962).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Simmons, M. J. & Bucholz, L. M. Transposase titration in Drosophila melanogaster : A model of cytotype in the P-M system of hybrid dysgenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 8119–8123 (1985).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sawyer, S. A. et al. Distribution and abundance of insertion sequences among natural isolates of Escherichia coli. Genetics 115, 51–63 (1987).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar