Regional disparities in the beneficial effects of rising CO2 concentrations on crop water productivity (original) (raw)

References

1. Kimball, B. A. in Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems, Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation Vol. 1 (eds Hillel, D. & Rosenzweig, C.) 87–107 (Imperial College, 2011).
   Google Scholar
2. Vanuytrecht, E., Raes, D., Willems, P. & Geerts, S. Quantifying field-scale effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on crops. Clim. Res. 54, 35–47 (2012).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Rosenzweig, C. et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3268–3273 (2014).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Vörösmarty, C. J. et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467, 555–561 (2010).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Schewe, J. et al. Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3245–3250 (2014).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
6. Wheeler, T. R. & von Braun, J. Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341, 508–513 (2013).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Elliott, J. et al. Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3239–3244 (2014).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
8. Hanjra, M. A. & Qureshi, M. E. Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy 35, 365–377 (2010).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Rockström, J. & Falkenmark, M. Semiarid crop production from a hydrological perspective: gap between potential and actual yields. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 19, 319–346 (2000).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Brauman, K. A., Siebert, S. & Foley, J. A. Improvements in crop water productivity increase water sustainability and food security—a global analysis. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024030 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Burkart, S., Manderscheid, R., Wittich, K. P., Löpmeier, F. J. & Weigel, H. J. Elevated CO2 effects on canopy and soil water flux parameters measured using a large chamber in crops grown with free-air CO2 enrichment. Plant Biol. 13, 258–269 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Leakey, A. D. B., Nösbsrger, J. & Ort, D. R. Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 312, 1918–1921 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
13. Tubiello, F. N. et al. Crop response to elevated CO2 and world food supply: a comment on “Food for Thought...” by Long et al., Science 312: 1918–1921, 2006. Eur. J. Agron. 26, 215–223 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. Ainsworth, E. A., Leakey, A. D. B., Ort, D. R. & Long, S. P. FACE-ing the facts: inconsistencies and interdependence among field, chamber and modeling studies of elevated [CO2] impacts on crop yield and food supply. New Phytol. 179, 5–9 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Leakey, A. D. B. et al. Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2859–2876 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
16. Leakey, A. D. B., Bishop, K. A. & Ainsworth, E. A. A multi-biome gap in understanding of crop and ecosystem responses to elevated CO2 . Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 228–236 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
17. Rosenthal, D. M. & Tomeo, N. J. Climate, crops and lacking data underlie regional disparities in the CO2 fertilization effect. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 031001 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
18. Boote, K. J., Jones, J. W., White, J. W., Asseng, S. & Lizaso, J. I. Putting mechanisms into crop production models. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1658–1672 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Liu, J. A GIS-based tool for modelling large-scale crop-water relations. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24, 411–422 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
20. Fader, M., Rost, S., Müller, C., Bondeau, A. & Gerten, D. Virtual water content of temperate cereals and maize: present and potential future patterns. J. Hydrol. 384, 218–231 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
21. Porter, J. R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) Ch. 7, 485–533 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
22. Asseng, S. et al. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 827–832 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Hempel, S., Frieler, K., Warszawski, L., Schewe, J. & Piontek, F. A trend-preserving bias correction—the ISI-MIP approach. Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss. 4, 49–92 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
25. Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S. & Döll, P. MIRCA2000—Global monthly irrigated and rainfed crop areas around the year 2000: a new high-resolution data set for agricultural and hydrological modeling. Glob. Biogeochem. 24, 024023 (2010).
    Google Scholar
26. Rockström, J. et al. Managing water in rainfed agriculture—The need for a paradigm shift. Agric. Water Manage. 97, 543–550 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
27. Rost, S. et al. Global potential to increase crop production through water management in rainfed agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 044002 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Gassman, P. W. et al. Historical Development and Applications of the EPIC and APEX Models Working Paper 05-WP 397 (2005); http://www.card.iastate.edu/publications/dbs/pdffiles/05wp397.pdf
29. Izaurralde, R. C., Williams, J. R., McGill, W. B., Rosenberg, N. J. & Jakas, M. C. Q. Simulating soil C dynamics with EPIC: model description and testing against long-term data. Ecol. Model. 192, 362–384 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
30. Williams, J. R. EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator Technical Bulletin Number 1768 (USDA Agricultural Research Service, 1990).
31. Williams, J. R. in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology (ed. Singh, V. P.) Ch. 25, 909–1000 (Water Resources, 1995).
    Google Scholar
32. Liu, J., Williams, J. R., Zehnder, A. & Yang, H. GEPIC—modelling wheat yield and crop water productivity with high resolution on a global scale. Agric. Syst. 94, 478–493 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Bondeau, A. et al. Modelling the role of agriculture in the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 679–706 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
34. Waha, K., van Bussel, L. G. J., Müller, C. & Bondeau, A. Climate-driven simulation of global crop sowing dates. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 247–259 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
35. Lindeskog, M. et al. Implications of accounting for land use in simulations of ecosystem services and carbon cycling in Africa. Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss. 4, 235–278 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Smith, B., Prentice, I. C. & Sykes, M. T. Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 10, 621–637 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
37. Elliott, J. et al. The parallel system for integrating impact models and sectors (pSIMS). Environ. Modell. Softw. 62, 509–516 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
38. Jones, J. W. et al. The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur. J. Agron. 18, 235–265 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
39. Deryng, D., Conway, D., Ramankutty, N., Price, J. & Warren, R. Global crop yield response to extreme heat stress under multiple climate change futures. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 034011 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
40. Deryng, D., Sacks, W. J., Barford, C. C. & Ramankutty, N. Simulating the effects of climate and agricultural management practices on global crop yield. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 25, 1–18 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
41. Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
42. Sitch, S. et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling inthe LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 161–185 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Penman, H. L. Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil, and grass. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 193, 120–145 (1948).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
44. Monteith, J. Evaporation and environment. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 19, 205–224 (1965).
    CAS Google Scholar
45. Priestley, C. H. B. & Taylor, R. J. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters. Mon. Weath. Rev. 100, 81–92 (1972).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R. & Williams, J. R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool. Theoretical Documentation, Version 2005 (Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, 2005).
    Google Scholar
47. Stockle, C. O., Williams, J. R., Rosenberg, N. J. & Jones, C. A. A method for estimating the direct and climatic effects of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on growth and yield of crops: Part 1–modification of the epic model for climate change analysis. Agric. Syst. 38, 225–238 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
48. Boote, K. J., Allen, L. H. Jr, Prasad, P. V. V. & Jones, J. W. in Handbook of Climate Change and Agroecosystems—Impacts, Adaptation, and Mitigation Vol. 1 (eds Hillel, D. & Rosenzweig, C.) Ch. 6 (Imperial College, 2011).
    Google Scholar
49. Farquhar, G. & von Caemmerer, S. in Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series Vol. 12B (ed. Lange, O.) 549–587 (Springer, 1982).
    Google Scholar
50. Boote, K. J. & Pickering, N. B. Modeling photosynthesis of row crop canopies. HortScience 29, 1423–1434 (1994).
    Article Google Scholar
51. Pickering, N. B., Jones, J. W. & Boote, K. J. in Climate Change and Agriculture: Analysis of Potential International Impacts (eds Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W. & Allen, L. H. J.) 147–162 (American Society of Agronomy, 1995).
    Google Scholar
52. Gerten, D., Schaphoff, S. & Lucht, W. Potential future changes in water limitations of the terrestrial biosphere. Climatic Change 80, 277–299 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
53. Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L. & McMahon, T. A. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 4, 439–473 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
54. Hunsaker, D. J., Kimball, B. A., Pinter, P. J., LaMorte, R. L. & Wall, G. W. Carbon dioxide enrichment and irrigation effects on wheat evapotranspiration and water use efficiency. Trans. ASAE 39, 1345–1355 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Hunsaker, D. J. et al. CO2 enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on wheat evapotranspiration and water use efficiency. Agric. For. Meteorol. 104, 85–105 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
56. Kimball, B. A., Kobayashi, K. & Bindi, M. Responses of Agricultural Crops to Free-Air CO2 Enrichment 77, 293–368 (2002).
    Google Scholar
57. Kimball, B. A. et al. Free-air CO2 enrichment and soil nitrogen effects on energy balance and evapotranspiration of wheat. Wat. Resour. Res. 35, 1179–1190 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
58. Weigel, H.-J. & Manderscheid, R. Crop growth responses to free air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen fertilization: rotating barley, ryegrass, sugar beet and wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 43, 97–107 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
59. O’Leary, G. et al. Response of wheat growth, grain yield and water use to elevated CO2 under a Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiment and modelling in a semi-arid environment. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2670–2686 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
60. Zhu, C., Xu, X., Wang, D., Zhu, J. & Liu, G. An indica rice genotype showed a similar yield enhancement to that of hybrid rice under free air carbon dioxide enrichment. Sci. Rep. 5, 12719 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
61. Shimono, H., Nakamura, H., Hasegawa, T. & Okada, M. Lower responsiveness of canopy evapotranspiration rate than of leaf stomatal conductance to open-air CO2 elevation in rice. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 2444–2453 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
62. Bernacchi, C. J., Kimball, B. A., Quarles, D. R., Long, S. P. & Ort, D. R. Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiol. 143, 134–144 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
63. Manderscheid, R., Erbs, M. & Weigel, H.-J. Interactive effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and drought stress on maize growth. Eur. J. Agron. 52, 11–21 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references