A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice (original) (raw)

Main

The SARS-CoV emerged in Asia as a highly aggressive pathogen that can be lethal in adults and the elderly1,2,3,4,5,[6](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR6 "World Health Organization. Consensus document on the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). WHO 〈 http://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/WHOconcensus.pdf

            〉 (2003)"). Although its genetic organization is similar to other coronaviruses, recent phylogenetic studies suggest that it may be most closely related to type II coronaviruses[7](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR7 "Rota, P. A. et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 300, 1394–1399 (2003)"),[8](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR8 "Marra, M. A. et al. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 300, 1399–1404 (2003)"),[9](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR9 "Snijder, E. J. et al. Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS-coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus group 2 lineage. J. Mol. Biol. 331, 991–1004 (2003)"). Previously described coronaviruses have not usually induced lethal disease in humans, but their pathogenicity in domestic animal species has been well documented[10](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR10 "Lai, M. M. C. & Holmes, K. V. in Fields Virology (ed. Knipe, D. M.) 1163–1185 (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001)"), and experimental vaccines developed for animals have provided insight into mechanisms of protective immunity[11](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR11 "Saif, L. J. Coronavirus immunogens. Vet. Microbiol. 37, 285–297 (1993)"),[12](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR12 "Park, S. et al. Immune response of sows vaccinated with attenuated transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and recombinant TGEV spike protein vaccines and protection of their suckling pigs against virulent TGEV challenge exposure. Am. J. Vet. Res. 59, 1002–1008 (1998)"). Studies of the immune response to coronaviruses suggest that both cell-mediated and humoral immunity contribute to long-term protection[13](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR13 "Sestak, K. et al. Active immunity and T-cell populations in pigs intraperitoneally inoculated with baculovirus-expressed transmissible gastroenteritis virus structural proteins. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 70, 203–221 (1999)"),[14](/articles/nature02463#ref-CR14 "Holmes, K. V. in Fields Virology (ed. Knipe, D. M.) 1187–1203 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001)").

To discover the gene products and mechanisms of protective immunity relevant to SARS-CoV, two sets of cDNAs encoding the SARS-CoV S glycoproteins were prepared using modified codons to optimize expression and to minimize recombination with endogenous coronaviruses. Because coronaviruses assemble in the compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus10, and the S leader may direct it to the ER, the native leader sequence was retained in one set of vectors (Fig. 1a) and replaced in another set with a leader sequence derived from the interleukin-2 gene. Expression was not significantly altered by this leader sequence substitution (data not shown), and it was not studied further. Two S carboxy-terminal mutants, one that truncated the cytoplasmic domain (SΔCD) and another that deleted the transmembrane and cytoplasmic regions (SΔTM), were prepared, and expression of these cDNAs by a mammalian expression vector suitable for human vaccination was confirmed (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1: Schematic representation of SARS-CoV glycoprotein cDNAs and expression of recombinant proteins.

figure 1

a, The structure of the cDNAs used. b, Expression of these constructs, determined by western blot analysis with antisera reactive with SARS-CoV S, was evaluated after transfection of the indicated plasmid expression vectors in 293T cells. Arrows indicate specific SΔCD (upper) and SΔTM (lower) bands.

Full size image

The plasmids encoding these modified S glycoproteins were analysed for their ability to elicit antiviral immunity after intramuscular injection in BALB/c mice. Injection of S, SΔTM and SΔCD expression vectors induced a substantial immune response. A marked increase was observed in the number of SARS-CoV S-specific CD4 T-cell immune responses (Fig. 2a), as measured by intracellular cytokine staining for interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). In addition, substantial SARS-CoV S-specific CD8 cellular immunity was detected at levels at least sevenfold above the background response. Humoral immunity was initially assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with lectin-captured SΔTM protein expressed in 293T cells (see Methods). Substantial end-point dilution antibody titres were observed in all groups, ranging from ∼1:400 to ∼1:2,000 (Fig. 2b, left panel).

Figure 2: Immune responses to SARS-CoV DNA vaccination in BALB/c mice.

figure 2

a, Intracellular cytokine staining was performed to quantify the percentage of activated T cells that produce either IFN-γ or TNF-α in response to stimulation with overlapping S peptide pools in CD4 (left) or CD8 (right) lymphocytes from mice (n = 5 per group) immunized with empty plasmid vector (control) or mice (n = 5 per group) immunized with the indicated plasmid at weeks 0, 3 and 6. Immune responses were measured 10 days after the final boost. Non-stimulated cells gave responses similar to those of the control subjects, at background levels. Symbols indicate the response of each individual animal, and the median value is shown (horizontal bar). b, Antibody responses induced by plasmid DNA vaccination against the SARS-CoV S protein. End-point dilution ELISA titres of SARS-CoV S-specific antibodies (left panel) in serum of vaccinated animals collected 10 days after the final boost were determined by optical density as described in the Methods. Neutralization by antisera from mice immunized with the relevant SARS-CoV S mutant or no insert (control) plasmid DNA vectors at the indicated concentrations was measured using the luciferase assay with S pseudotyped lentiviral vectors (middle panel). Reduction of gene transfer was observed with immune sera in a dose-dependent fashion. Twofold dilutions of heat-inactivated sera were tested in a microneutralization assay for the presence of antibodies that neutralized the infectivity of 100 TCID50 of SARS-CoV in Vero cell monolayers, using four wells per dilution on a 96-well plate (right panel). The presence of viral cytopathic effect (cpe) was read on days 3 and 4. The dilution of serum that completely prevented cpe in 50% of the wells was calculated by the Reed Muench formula. Data are presented as the mean ± s.e. for each group. A non-parametric two-tailed _t_-test (Mann–Whitney) was used for statistical analysis, and the relevant P values are indicated (b, right panel).

Full size image

To analyse the ability of these S glycoprotein plasmids to elicit a neutralizing antibody response, a pseudotyping assay was performed15. Animals immunized with the SARS-CoV SΔCD expression vector induced substantial neutralizing antibody titres ranging from 1:50 to 1:150, unlike the vector control (Fig. 2b, middle panel). The S expression vector with the transmembrane domain deleted, SΔTM, also induced neutralizing antibodies, but the titres were lower (from 1:25 to 1:75). The vector with the partial cytoplasmic domain deletion induced the optimal response (Fig. 2b, right panel). Similar neutralization was observed when the complete cytoplasmic domain was removed (data not shown), suggesting that synthesis of the glycoprotein on the cell surface, without the cytoplasmic domain, is required for this response. This may be because it gives rise to a more native structure relevant to the function of this virus. Possibly, the transmembrane region helps to form a more physiological form of the S protein by anchoring the protein on the membrane, preserving conformational determinants and/or stabilizing the formation of the putative trimer. The same antisera were also used in a SARS-CoV microneutralization assay to assess the neutralization titre against SARS-CoV. Again, antisera from SΔCD-vaccinated mice elicited the most potent neutralizing antibody responses (Fig. 2b, right panel).

Infection of non-human primates with SARS-CoV has been reported, with evidence of pulmonary pathology and seroconversion16. More recently, an animal model that may better reproduce the signs and time course of the human disease has been described. In this model, which uses ferrets, the development of pneumonitis and increased viral replication have been observed17. A murine model of SARS-CoV replication has also been described recently, in which intranasal administration of 104 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) units of SARS-CoV leads to virus replication in the lungs and nasal turbinates within 1–2 days18. This model afforded us the opportunity to examine immune protection against viral replication in the respiratory tract as a measure of vaccine efficacy. BALB/c mice were immunized with the various plasmid DNAs encoding S protein and challenged 30 days after the final boost. Animals were challenged intranasally with 104 TCID50 units of SARS-CoV (Urbani strain), and viral replication in the respiratory tract was measured 2 days later. In this analysis, the most potent immunogen, SARS SΔCD, led to >106-fold reduction in viral load in the lungs compared with a control group injected with vector alone, in which mean viral titres of >108 were observed (Fig. 3a; P = 0.0079). Although the S plasmid with the deleted transmembrane domain elicited a lower neutralizing antibody response, it was equally effective in reducing viral replication in the lungs. A 60- to 300-fold reduction of virus titre in the nasal turbinates was also observed (Fig. 3b; P = 0.0079). In both cases, evidence of productive SARS-CoV replication was not observed in mice vaccinated with plasmid DNAs encoding SΔCD or SΔTM.

Figure 3: Protection against pulmonary SARS-CoV replication after challenge in BALB/c mice following DNA vaccination.

figure 3

Immunization and challenge were performed in mice as described previously18, and viral replication (mean log10TCID50 per g tissue with standard error) in the lower (a) and upper (b) respiratory tract after challenge with SARS-CoV was measured for five immunized animals inoculated with SΔCD, SΔTM or empty plasmid vector control. The lower limit for detection of SARS-CoV replication was 1.5 TCID50 per g in the lungs and 1.8 TCID50 per g in the nasal turbinates. A non-parametric two-tailed _t_-test (Mann–Whitney) was used for statistical analysis. Log-transformed virus titres were compared, and statistical significance was assigned to the differences, both with a P value of 0.0079.

Full size image

To define the mechanism of protection, T-cell depletion with specific monoclonal antibodies was performed, and depletion in the lung and spleen was confirmed (Supplementary Fig. 1). Depletion with CD4 or CD8, alone or in combination with CD90, did not affect vaccine-induced immunity (Fig. 4a). This finding was confirmed when the role of T-cell immunity was further analysed by adoptive T-cell transfer; donor immune T cells were unable to reduce pulmonary viral replication in recipient animals (Fig. 4b; P = 0.49). By contrast, passive transfer of purified IgG from immunized, but not control, mice provided immune protection (Fig. 4c, right panel; P = 0.0286) comparable to that observed in DNA-vaccinated animals (Fig. 3a). These findings indicate that immune T cells do not control pulmonary virus replication in this animal model, although it remains possible that T cells contribute to viral clearance if replication persists.

Figure 4: Immune mechanism of protection: T-cell depletion, adoptive transfer and antibody passive transfer.

figure 4

a, Monoclonal rat anti-mouse anti-CD4, CD8 or CD4/CD8/CD90 were used to deplete T cells in SΔCD and control vaccinated mice (n = 4) as described previously23. Mice were then challenged with SARS-CoV 48 h later. Viral replication in the lungs was measured as described in Fig. 3. Data represent mean ± s.e., and no statistically significant difference was observed between groups depleted as shown. b, Lack of protection against SARS-CoV replication in the lungs after adoptive T-cell transfer from vaccinated mice. Each naive mouse (n = 4) received 3 × 107 purified T cells from a donor mouse confirmed to respond to the vaccine (immune) or from a non-immune mouse (control). The recipient mice were challenged 24 h after adoptive T-cell transfer. Viral titre in lungs was measured as described in Fig. 3. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney two-tailed _t_-test (P = 0.49). c, Protection against SARS-CoV replication in the lungs after passive transfer of immune IgG from vaccinated mice. Purified IgG from SΔCD or control vaccinated donor mice (n = 4) was passively transferred into recipient naive mice (n = 4). Serum from recipient mice was collected one day before challenge, and neutralization was confirmed using the S pseudotyped lentiviral vector (left panel). Recipient mice (n = 4 per group) were challenged 24 h after IgG transfer with 104 TCID50 SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV replication was measured as described in Fig. 3. The non-parametric two-tailed _t_-test (Mann–Whitney) revealed a statistically significant difference of P = 0.0286 between these two groups (right panel).

Full size image

In this report, DNA vaccination has been used to induce cellular and humoral immunity to the SARS-CoV S glycoprotein. The humoral immune response includes the generation of neutralizing antibodies. This humoral immunity alone can inhibit pulmonary viral replication in a murine challenge model and suggests that DNA vaccination with the SARS-CoV S glycoprotein gene results in protective immunity. The SARS-CoV is a novel coronavirus, but vaccines for other human coronaviruses have not been successfully developed14. But considerable experience in developing vaccines against common veterinary coronaviruses has been obtained with animal coronaviruses11,12. The feline infectious peritonitis virus is a coronavirus that causes significant morbidity and mortality in domestic animals for which vaccines have been investigated, but the development of these vaccines has been complicated by possible immune potentiation of the disease and by viral evolution19. In the present study, T-cell depletion and immune IgG passive transfer were used to assess the importance of humoral responses in protection against SARS-CoV challenge. These results suggest that antibodies against SARS-CoV S glycoprotein protect against SARS-CoV challenge and do not enhance infection in this animal model. The cellular immune response appears to play a limited role in protection, although studies of animal coronaviruses have suggested that both cellular and humoral immunity contribute to protection during persistent infection13,14.

DNA vaccines have been used in a variety of animal models for different infectious diseases, including influenza, HIV, Ebola, West Nile and other viruses (reviewed in ref. 20). Despite their success in animal models, this approach has only recently been used in human studies, and its potential to protect against human diseases has yet to be established. For this reason, as well as the limitations of the animal model for SARS-CoV infections, it is important to ascertain the immunogenicity of these plasmids in humans. Should the response be suboptimal, it can be readily augmented using prime-boost combinations with inactivated viral vaccine candidates or with adenoviral or poxvirus vectors. The definition of effective viral genes reported here can guide the choice of inserts for such gene-based vaccination approaches. For example, the SΔCD mutant can be expressed in other vector delivery systems for analysis, alone or in various combinations. Although the murine model allows assessment of various antiviral approaches and examination of the effect of immunity on pulmonary virus replication, it does not show sustained infection or high lethality. The model of infection that has been described in ferrets shows prominent pulmonary pathology associated with infection, and the efficacy of such vaccines in this and other pathogenic animal models will be of interest in future studies. At the same time, it is not known whether even the ferret model faithfully replicates the complex pathology and symptomatology of the human disease, and it will be necessary to test potential SARS vaccine candidates for their immunogenicity, safety and efficacy in humans in the event of future outbreaks.

Methods

Immunogen and plasmid construction

Plasmids encoding different versions of SARS-CoV spike (S) protein (Urbani strain, GenBank AY278741) were synthesized using human-preferred codons as previously described15. Protein expression was confirmed by western blot analysis21 with serum from a recovered patient (provided by W. Bellini).

Vaccination

Female BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks old; Charles River Labs) were immunized with 25 µg of plasmid DNA in 200 µl of PBS (pH 7.4) at weeks 0, 3 and 6.

Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular cytokines

CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses were evaluated by using intracellular cytokine flow cytometry (ICC) for IFN-γ and TNF-α as previously described21 with peptide pools (17–19 mers overlapping by 10 amino acids, 2.5 µg ml-1 each) covering the SARS-CoV spike protein. Cells were then fixed, permeabilized, and stained using rat monoclonal anti-mouse CD3, CD4, CD8, IFN-γ and TNF-α (BD-Pharmingen). The IFN-γ- and TNF-α-positive cells in the CD4+ and CD8+ cell populations were analysed with the program FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc.).

ELISA for mouse anti-SARS-S IgG

The mouse anti-SARS-S IgG ELISA titre was measured using a modified lectin-capture method described previously21 except the Myc-tagged, transmembrane-domain-truncated SARS-CoV S protein (SARS-SΔTM–Myc) was used for capture.

Inhibition of viral gene transfer to measure mouse antibody titre

SARS-CoV spike pseudotyped lentiviruses expressing a luciferase reporter gene were produced by transfecting 293T cells with the following plasmids: 7 µg of pCMVΔR8.2, 7 µg of pHR′CMV-Luc and 400 ng CMV/R-SARS-S. Cells were transfected overnight, washed and replenished with fresh media. Forty-eight hours later, supernatants were harvested, filtered through a 0.45 µm syringe filter, aliquotted and used immediately or frozen at -80 °C. p24 levels were measured from different viral stocks using the Coulter HIV-1 p24 Antigen Assay kit (Beckman Coulter). Antisera were mixed with 100 µl of pseudoviruses at various dilutions and added to Vero cells in 48-well dishes (30,000 cells per well). Plates were washed and fresh media were added 14–16 h later. Forty-eight hours after infection, cells were lysed in mammalian cell lysis buffer (Promega). A standard quantity of cell lysate was used in a luciferase assay with luciferase assay reagent (Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Neutralization of SARS-CoV by mouse immune antisera

Twofold dilutions of heat-inactivated sera were tested in a microneutralization assay for the presence of antibodies that neutralized the infectivity of 100 TCID50 of SARS-CoV on Vero cell monolayers, using four wells per dilution on a 96-well plate. The presence of viral cytopathic effect (cpe) was tested for on days 3 and 4. The dilution of serum that completely prevented cpe in 50% of the wells was calculated by the Reed Muench formula22.

Challenge of immunized mice with SARS-CoV

Vaccinated mice were lightly anaesthetized with isoflurane and inoculated with 50 µl of diluted virus (104 TCID50 of SARS-CoV; Urbani strain) intranasally according to institutional animal care and use guidelines in an ABSL3 facility. On day 2, mice were euthanized and lungs and nasal turbinates were removed and stored at -70 °C until the end of the study. The frozen tissues were thawed and homogenized in a 10% (lungs) or 5% (nasal turbinates) w/v suspension in Leibovitz 15 medium (Invitrogen), and virus titres were determined in Vero cell monolayers in 24- and 96-well plates. Virus titres are expressed as TCID50 per g of tissue. The lower limit of detection of infectious virus in 10% and 5% w/v suspensions is 1.5 for lung and 1.8 log10 TCID50 per g for nasal turbinate homogenates, respectively.

Depletion of T-cell subsets in vivo

To deplete specific T-cell subsets, known rat monoclonal antibodies (anti-mouse CD4 (GK1.5), anti-mouse CD8(2.43) or anti-mouse CD90(30-H12)), prepared as described previously23 and provided by S. L. Epstein (FDA), were administered intraperitoneally (1 mg each in 1 ml PBS) 48 h before challenge. The depletion was confirmed before challenge (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Passive transfer of immunoglobin

IgG from mice immunized with plasmid DNA encoding SΔCD (immune) or no insert (controls) was purified from sera using a Protein A Antibody Purification Kit (Sigma), and neutralization activity was confirmed using the mouse pseudotyping assay. Briefly, 0.3 ml of purified IgG (from approximately 1 ml of serum) was administered intravenously into each recipient naive mouse (n = 4 per group) by tail vein injection 24 h before challenge. Sera were collected from recipient BALB/c mice 3 h post transfer to confirm the neutralizing antibody titre in recipient animals.

Adoptive T-cell transfer studies

T cells from vaccinated (immune) or nonimmune (control) mice were enriched using a Pan T-Cell Isolation Kit (Miltenyi Biotec). Approximately 3 × 107 T cells in 0.5 ml PBS were administered into each recipient naive BALB/c mouse intravenously through the tail vein 24 h before challenge. There were four recipient mice per group.

References

  1. Ksiazek, T. G. et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1953–1966 (2003)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Drosten, C. et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1967–1976 (2003)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Tsang, K. W. et al. A cluster of cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1977–1985 (2003)
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Lee, N. et al. A major outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Hong Kong. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1986–1994 (2003)
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Poutanen, S. M. et al. Identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Canada. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1995–2005 (2003)
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  6. World Health Organization. Consensus document on the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). WHO 〈http://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/WHOconcensus.pdf〉 (2003)
  7. Rota, P. A. et al. Characterization of a novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. Science 300, 1394–1399 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Marra, M. A. et al. The genome sequence of the SARS-associated coronavirus. Science 300, 1399–1404 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Snijder, E. J. et al. Unique and conserved features of genome and proteome of SARS-coronavirus, an early split-off from the coronavirus group 2 lineage. J. Mol. Biol. 331, 991–1004 (2003)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  10. Lai, M. M. C. & Holmes, K. V. in Fields Virology (ed. Knipe, D. M.) 1163–1185 (Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001)
    Google Scholar
  11. Saif, L. J. Coronavirus immunogens. Vet. Microbiol. 37, 285–297 (1993)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Park, S. et al. Immune response of sows vaccinated with attenuated transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and recombinant TGEV spike protein vaccines and protection of their suckling pigs against virulent TGEV challenge exposure. Am. J. Vet. Res. 59, 1002–1008 (1998)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Sestak, K. et al. Active immunity and T-cell populations in pigs intraperitoneally inoculated with baculovirus-expressed transmissible gastroenteritis virus structural proteins. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 70, 203–221 (1999)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, K. V. in Fields Virology (ed. Knipe, D. M.) 1187–1203 (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001)
    Google Scholar
  15. Yang, Z.-Y. et al. pH-dependent entry of SARS coronavirus is mediated by the Spike glycoprotein and enhanced by dendritic cell-mediated transfer through DC-SIGN. J. Virol. (in the press)
  16. Fouchier, R. A. et al. Aetiology: Koch's postulates fulfilled for SARS virus. Nature 423, 240 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Martina, B. E. et al. Virology: SARS virus infection of cats and ferrets. Nature 425, 915 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Subbarao, K. et al. Prior infection and passive transfer of neutralizing antibody prevent replication of SARS coronavirus in the respiratory tract of mice. J. Virol. 78, 3572–3577 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  19. Perlman, S. Pathogenesis of coronavirus-induced infections. Review of pathological and immunological aspects. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 440, 503–513 (1998)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Gurunathan, S., Klinman, D. M. & Seder, R. A. DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18, 927–974 (2000)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Kong, W. P. et al. Immunogenicity of multiple gene and clade human immunodeficiency virus type 1 DNA vaccines. J. Virol. 77, 12764–12772 (2003)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  22. Reed, L. J. & Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27, 493–497 (1938)
    Google Scholar
  23. Epstein, S. L. et al. Vaccination with DNA encoding internal proteins of influenza virus does not require CD8(+ ) cytotoxic T lymphocytes: either CD4(+ ) or CD8(+ ) T cells can promote survival and recovery after challenge. Int. Immunol. 12, 91–101 (2000)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. McAuliffe and L. Vogel from the Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, M. St Claire, T. Tobery and staff at Bioqual for assistance in challenge studies, S. Rao and his staff for assistance in passive and adoptive transfer studies, J. Mascola for discussion, S. Epstein for supplying the monoclonal antibodies, A. Tislerics and T. Suhana for manuscript preparation, K. Stroud for preparation of figures, and members of the Nabel laboratory for advice and discussions.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhi-yong Yang and Wing-pui Kong: These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vaccine Research Center, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, Building 40, Room 4502, MSC-3005, 40 Convent Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-3005, USA
    Zhi-yong Yang, Wing-pui Kong, Yue Huang & Gary J. Nabel
  2. Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, NIAID, National Institutes of Health, MSC-8007, 50 South Drive, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892-8007, USA
    Anjeanette Roberts, Brian R. Murphy & Kanta Subbarao

Authors

  1. Zhi-yong Yang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Wing-pui Kong
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Yue Huang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Anjeanette Roberts
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Brian R. Murphy
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Kanta Subbarao
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Gary J. Nabel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toGary J. Nabel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, Zy., Kong, Wp., Huang, Y. et al. A DNA vaccine induces SARS coronavirus neutralization and protective immunity in mice.Nature 428, 561–564 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02463

Download citation