The origin of the naked grains of maize (original) (raw)

Nature volume 436, pages 714–719 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The most critical step in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays) domestication was the liberation of the kernel from the hardened, protective casing that envelops the kernel in the maize progenitor, teosinte1. This evolutionary step exposed the kernel on the surface of the ear, such that it could readily be used by humans as a food source. Here we show that this key event in maize domestication is controlled by a single gene (teosinte glume architecture or tga1), belonging to the SBP-domain family2 of transcriptional regulators. The factor controlling the phenotypic difference between maize and teosinte maps to a 1-kilobase region, within which maize and teosinte show only seven fixed differences in their DNA sequences. One of these differences encodes a non-conservative amino acid substitution and may affect protein function, and the other six differences potentially affect gene regulation. Molecular evolution analyses show that this region was the target of selection during maize domestication. Our results demonstrate that modest genetic changes in single genes can induce dramatic changes in phenotype during domestication and evolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorweiler, J., Stec, A., Kermicle, J. & Doebley, J. Teosinte glume architecture1: A genetic locus controlling a key step in maize evolution. Science 262, 233–235 (1993)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Klein, J., Saedler, H. & Huijser, P. A new family of DNA binding proteins includes putative transcriptional regulators of the Antirrhinum majus floral meristem identity gene SQUAMOSA. Mol. Gen. Genet. 250, 7–16 (1996)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Doebley, J. The genetics of maize evolution. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38, 37–59 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Maynard Smith, J. Macroevolution. Nature 289, 13–14 (1981)
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Mangelsdorf, P. C. & Reeves, R. G. The origin of maize. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 24, 303–312 (1938)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  6. Wilkes, H. G. Teosinte: The Closest Relative of Maize (Bussey Institution of Harvard Univ., Cambridge, 1967)
    Google Scholar
  7. Dorweiler, J. & Doebley, J. Developmental analysis of teosinte glume architecture1: a key locus in the evolution of maize (Poaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84, 1313–1322 (1997)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Doebley, J. & Stec, A. Inheritance of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte: comparison of results for two F2 populations. Genetics 134, 559–570 (1993)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  9. Tenaillon, M. I., U'Ren, J., Tenaillon, O. & Gaut, B. S. Selection versus demography: A multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 1214–1225 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  11. Hudson, R. R., Kreitman, M. & Aguade, M. A. test of neutral molecular evolution based on nucleotide data. Genetics 116, 153–159 (1987)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. White, S. E. & Doebley, J. F. The molecular evolution of terminal ear1, a regulatory gene in the genus Zea. Genetics 153, 1455–1462 (1999)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Clark, R. M., Linton, E., Messing, J. & Doebley, J. F. Pattern of diversity in the genomic region near the maize domestication gene tb1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 700–707 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Kim, Y. & Stephan, W. Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 160, 765–777 (2002)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  15. Przeworski, M. Estimating the time since the fixation of a beneficial allele. Genetics 164, 1667–1676 (2003)
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Beadle, G. W. Teosinte and the origin of maize. J. Hered. 30, 245–247 (1939)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Cong, B., Liu, J. & Tanksley, S. D. Natural alleles at a tomato fruit size quantitative trait locus differ by heterochronic regulatory mutations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13606–13611 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Doebley, J., Stec, A. & Hubbard, L. The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386, 485–488 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Nesbitt, T. C. & Tanksley, S. D. Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon. Implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162, 365–379 (2002)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  20. Purugganan, M. D., Boyles, A. L. & Suddith, J. I. Variation and selection at the CAULIFLOWER floral homeotic gene accompanying the evolution of domesticated Brassica oleracea. Genetics 155, 855–862 (2000)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  21. Darwin, C. On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (John Murray, London, 1859)
    Google Scholar
  22. Gottlieb, L. D. Genetics and morphological evolution in plants. Am. Naturalist 123, 681–709 (1984)
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Lande, R. The response to selection on major and minor mutations affecting a metrical trait. Heredity 50, 47–65 (1983)
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Jackson, D. in Plant Molecular Pathology: A Practical Approach (eds Gurr, S. J., McPherson, M. J. & Bowles, D. J.) 163–174 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1992)
    Google Scholar
  25. Rozas, J. & Rozas, R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics 15, 174–175 (1999)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Baum and J. Wendel for comments, R. Clark for helpful discussions; E. Ananiev, K. Fengler and M. Morgante for help with screening and identifying BAC contigs; the DuPont sequencing group for BAC sequencing; and P. Rose for assistance with genetic mapping. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the USDA Hatch program (to J.F.D.), a Howard Hughes Medical Institute predoctoral fellowship (to K.B.), and an Environmental Protection Agency predoctoral fellowship (to L.L).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yves Vigouroux
    Present address: Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement, Montpellier, 34730, France
  2. Huai Wang and Tina Nussbaum-Wagler: *These authors contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin, 53706, Madison, USA
    Huai Wang, Tina Nussbaum-Wagler, Qiong Zhao, Yves Vigouroux, Kirsten Bomblies & John F. Doebley
  2. DuPont Crop Genetics, Wilmington, Delaware, 19880-353, USA
    Bailin Li & Marianna Faller
  3. Department of Plant Agriculture, Crop Science Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada
    Lewis Lukens

Authors

  1. Huai Wang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Tina Nussbaum-Wagler
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bailin Li
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Qiong Zhao
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Yves Vigouroux
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Marianna Faller
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Kirsten Bomblies
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Lewis Lukens
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. John F. Doebley
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJohn F. Doebley.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All sequences have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers AY883436–AY883568. Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

Includes Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Results, Supplementary Tables S1-S3 and Supplementary Figures. (DOC 519 kb)

Supplementary Figure S1

An enlarged version of Figures 1f-h from the main text. (PDF 47 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, H., Nussbaum-Wagler, T., Li, B. et al. The origin of the naked grains of maize.Nature 436, 714–719 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03863

Download citation

Editorial Summary

Domestic science

A simple genetic change liberated the naked kernel from the protective casing that envelops it in the maize progenitor, teosinte. With the kernel exposed on the surface of the ear it was readily utilized as a food source by humans. The domestication of maize was under way.