Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry (original) (raw)

Nature volume 449, pages 1033–1036 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

The ability of mass spectrometry to generate intact biomolecular ions efficiently in the gas phase has led to its widespread application in metabolomics1, proteomics2, biological imaging3, biomarker discovery4 and clinical assays (namely neonatal screens5). Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization6,7 (MALDI) and electrospray ionization8 have been at the forefront of these developments. However, matrix application complicates the use of MALDI for cellular, tissue, biofluid and microarray analysis and can limit the spatial resolution because of the matrix crystal size9 (typically more than 10 μm), sensitivity and detection of small compounds (less than 500 Da). Secondary-ion mass spectrometry10 has extremely high lateral resolution (100 nm) and has found biological applications11,12 although the energetic desorption/ionization is a limitation owing to molecular fragmentation. Here we introduce nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry (NIMS), a tool for spatially defined mass analysis. NIMS uses ‘initiator’ molecules trapped in nanostructured surfaces or ‘clathrates’ to release and ionize intact molecules adsorbed on the surface. This surface responds to both ion and laser irradiation. The lateral resolution (ion-NIMS about 150 nm), sensitivity, matrix-free and reduced fragmentation of NIMS allows direct characterization of peptide microarrays, direct mass analysis of single cells, tissue imaging, and direct characterization of blood and urine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Want, E. J., Cravatt, B. F. & Siuzdak, G. The expanding role of mass spectrometry in metabolite profiling and characterization. ChemBioChem 6, 1941–1951 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422, 198–207 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Chaurand, P., Stoeckli, M. & Caprioli, R. M. Direct profiling of proteins in biological tissue sections by MALDI mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 71, 5263–5270 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Lindon, J. C., Holmes, E. & Nicholson, J. K. Metabonomics in pharmaceutical R&D. FEBS J. 274, 1140–1151 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Chace, D. H. et al. Rapid diagnosis of phenylketonuria by quantitative analysis for phenylalanine and tyrosine in neonatal blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 39, 66–71 (1993)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Karas, M. & Hillenkamp, F. Laser desorption ionization of proteins with molecular masses exceeding 10,000 daltons. Anal. Chem. 60, 2299–2301 (1988)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Tanaka, K. et al. Protein and polymer analyses up to m/z 100 000 by laser ionization time-of flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2, 151–153 (1988)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. F. & Whitehouse, C. M. Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246, 64–71 (1989)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Caldwell, R. L. & Caprioli, R. M. Tissue profiling by mass spectrometry: a review of methodology and applications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 394–401 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Benninghoven, A. in Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (eds Benninghoven, A., Rüdenauer, F. G. & Werner, H. W.) 1–6, 664–761 (Wiley, New York, 1987)
    Google Scholar
  11. Kraft, M. L., Weber, P. K., Longo, M. L., Hutcheon, I. D. & Boxer, S. G. Phase separation of lipid membranes analyzed with high-resolution secondary ion mass spectrometry. Science 313, 1948–1951 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  12. Ostrowski, S. G. et al. Secondary ion MS imaging of lipids in picoliter vials with a buckminsterfullerene ion source. Anal. Chem. 77, 6190–6196 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. McLean, J. A., Stumpo, K. A. & Russell, D. H. Size-selected (2–10 nm) gold nanoparticles for matrix assisted laser desorption ionization of peptides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 5304–5305 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Wei, J., Buriak, J. M. & Siuzdak, G. Desorption–ionization mass spectrometry on porous silicon. Nature 399, 243–246 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Winograd, N. The magic of cluster SIMS. Anal. Chem. 77, 142A–149A (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Wu, K. J. & Odom, R. W. Matrix-enhanced secondary ion mass spectrometry: A method for molecular analysis of solid surfaces. Anal. Chem. 68, 873–882 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Grade, H. & Cooks, R. G. Secondary ion mass-spectrometry—cationization of organic-molecules with metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100, 5615–5621 (1978)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Overberg, A., Karas, M., Bahr, U., Kaufmann, R. & Hillenkamp, F. Matrix-assisted infrared-laser (2.94-μm) desorption ionization mass-spectrometry of large biomolecules. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 4, 293–296 (1990)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Singh-Gasson, S. et al. Maskless fabrication of light-directed oligonucleotide microarrays using a digital micromirror array. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 974–978 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Hashimoto, H., Nakamura, K., Takase, H., Okamoto, T. & Yamamoto, N. Quantitative TOF-SIMS imaging of DNA microarrays produced by bubble jet printing technique and the role of TOF-SIMS in life science industry. Appl. Surf. Sci. 231–2, 385–391 (2004)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  21. Xu, J. Y., Braun, R. M. & Winograd, N. Applicability of imaging time-of flight secondary ion MS to the characterization of solid-phase synthesized combinatorial libraries. Anal. Chem. 75, 6155–6162 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Wiseman, J. M., Ifa, D. R., Song, Q. & Cooks, R. G. Tissue imaging at atmospheric pressure using desorption electrospray ionization (DESI) mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 45, 7188–7192 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Chaurand, P., Norris, J. L., Cornett, D. S., Mobley, J. A. & Caprioli, R. M. New developments in profiling and imaging of proteins from tissue sections by MALDI mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 5, 2889–2900 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Hao, C., Clement, R. & Yang, P. Liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry of bioactive pharmaceutical compounds in the aquatic environment—a decade’s activities. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 387, 1247–1257 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Maurer, H. H. Position of chromatographic techniques in screening for detection of drugs or poisons in clinical and forensic toxicology and/or doping control. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 42, 1310–1324 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Fiedler, G. M. et al. Standardized peptidome profiling of human urine by magnetic bead separation and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin. Chem. 53, 421–428 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Villanueva, J. et al. Serum peptide profiling by magnetic particle-assisted, automated sample processing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 76, 1560–1570 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Kraemer, T. & Paul, L. D. Bioanalytical procedures for determination of drugs of abuse in blood. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 388, 1415–1435 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. J. Wu and L. Wu for initial TOF–SIMS analysis; N. Winograd, A. Brock, B. Bothner, P. Kuhn and B. F. Cravatt for comments; J. Hoffmann and S. Head for peptide array preparation; the Kuhn laboratory for cell culture and imaging; B. Bowen for software development; D. Herr and J. Chun for tissue sections; the K. L. Turner laboratory for SEM imaging; and S. A. Trauger for nanospray ESI analysis. A.N. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Swedish Research Council (VR). We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Department of Energy, the National Science Foundation, the National Cancer Institute and the National Institutes of Health.

Author Contributions T.R.N. and O.Y. contributed equally to this work. T.R.N. and G.S. conceived of NIMS, developed and applied NIMS, designed experiments, analysed data, and wrote the manuscript. O.Y. developed and applied NIMS, designed experiments, analysed data, and wrote the manuscript. M.T.N. performed SEM studies. D.M. prepared cell cultures and performed fluorescent imaging. A.N. and W.U. developed and applied NIMS. J.A. used NIMS to image mouse embryo. S.L.G. performed ion-NIMS.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Trent R. Northen, Oscar Yanes and Gary Siuzdak: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Biology,,
    Trent R. Northen, Oscar Yanes, Winnie Uritboonthai, Junefredo Apon, Anders Nordström & Gary Siuzdak
  2. Scripps Center for Mass Spectrometry,,
    Trent R. Northen, Oscar Yanes, Winnie Uritboonthai, Junefredo Apon, Anders Nordström & Gary Siuzdak
  3. Department of Cell Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, USA,
    Dena Marrinucci
  4. Materials Department, University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA,
    Michael T. Northen
  5. CAMCOR Surface Analysis Facility at the University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA ,
    Stephen L. Golledge

Authors

  1. Trent R. Northen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Oscar Yanes
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Michael T. Northen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Dena Marrinucci
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Winnie Uritboonthai
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Junefredo Apon
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Stephen L. Golledge
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Anders Nordström
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Gary Siuzdak
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toGary Siuzdak.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The file contains Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Figures 1-11 with Legends, Supplementary Tables 1-2, Supplementary Methods (including illustrated step-by-step procedures) and Legends for Supplementary Videos 1-8. The Supplementary Discussion includes: in depth discussion of the single cell results by laser-NIMS and its comparison with MALDI, nanoESI and ion-NIMS. Supplementary Figure 1 is a schematic to the main findings and applications of NIMS to aid readers unfamiliar with the immediate discipline. The Supplementary Figures 2-11 and the 2 Supplementary Tables provide results to proof and better understand assertions made throughout the printed version of the paper. Supplementary Methods contains a detailed step-by-step protocol to make NIMS chips. Some images are provided, as well as 7 Supplementary Videos (2-8) to visualize and facilitate the performance of this protocol. Supplementary Video 1 concerns NIMS mechanism and shows the reversible migration of the initiator within the nanostructure surface. (PDF 1264 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

The file contains Supplementary Movie 1 which shows perfluorinated initiator reversibly migrating out of the nanostructured surface in response to heating. (MOV 5241 kb)

Supplementary Movie 2

The file contains Supplementary Movie 2 which shows silicon wafer cutting with a diamond-tip scribe. (MOV 1885 kb)

Supplementary Movie 3

The file contains Supplementary Movie 3 which shows washing the wafer chip with methanol and blowing it off with UHP nitrogen. (MOV 1280 kb)

Supplementary Movie 4

The file contains Supplementary Movie 4 which shows assembling the teflon cell with the silicon wafer chip. (MOV 3096 kb)

Supplementary Movie 5

The file contains Supplementary Movie 5 which shows post-etching: teflon cell disassembling and washing. (MOV 3438 kb)

Supplementary Movie 6

The file contains Supplementary Movie 6 which shows washing and drying the chip with UHP nitrogen. (MOV 1834 kb)

Supplementary Movie 7

The file contains Supplementary Movie 7 which shows adding the initiator compound to the etched chip. (MOV 2606 kb)

Supplementary Movie 8

The file contains Supplementary Movie 8 which shows removing the excess of initiator compound with UHP nitrogen. (MOV 4132 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Northen, T., Yanes, O., Northen, M. et al. Clathrate nanostructures for mass spectrometry.Nature 449, 1033–1036 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06195

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Explosive spectrometry

Mass spectrometry has great potential for detecting biomolecules, but existing methods have several drawbacks, including a lack of sensitivity and the need for a matrix of molecules to promote analyte ionization. A dramatic new technique, using laser or ion beams to vaporize materials from nano-scale capsules, could overcome these limitations. It involves a specially prepared surface containing 'initiator' molecules that erupt violently when irradiated. This explosion releases ionized analyte molecules that were adsorbed to the surface, freeing them for detection. The method, dubbed NIMS (for nanostructure-initiator mass spectrometry), can analyse very small areas with extremely high sensitivity, allowing analysis of peptide microarrays, blood, urine and single cells, and it can even be used for tissue imaging.