Crystal structure of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module bound to the nucleosome (original) (raw)

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

Atomic coordinates and structure factors for the reported crystal structure have been deposited with the Protein Data Bank under accession code 4R8P.

References

  1. Boyer, L. A. et al. Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature Cell Biol. 441, 349–353 (2006)
    ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Di Croce, L. & Helin, K. Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1147–1155 (2013)
    CAS Google Scholar
  3. Laugesen, A. & Helin, K. Chromatin repressive complexes in stem cells, development, and cancer. Cell Stem Cell 14, 735–751 (2014)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Bracken, A. P. & Helin, K. Polycomb group proteins: navigators of lineage pathways led astray in cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 9, 773–784 (2009)
    CAS Google Scholar
  5. Crea, F., Paolicchi, E., Marquez, V. E. & Danesi, R. Polycomb genes and cancer: Time for clinical application? Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 83, 184–193 (2012)
    PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Simon, J. A. & Kingston, R. E. Mechanisms of polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 697–708 (2009)
    CAS Google Scholar
  7. Schwartz, Y. B. & Pirrotta, V. A new world of Polycombs: unexpected partnerships and emerging functions. Nature Rev. Genet. 14, 853–864 (2013)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Wang, H. et al. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 431, 873–878 (2004)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Cao, R., Tsukada, Y.-I. & Zhang, Y. Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A ubiquitylation and Hox gene silencing. Mol. Cell 20, 845–854 (2005)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Gao, Z. et al. PCGF homologs, CBX proteins, and RYBP define functionally distinct PRC1 family complexes. Mol. Cell 45, 344–356 (2012)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  11. Simon, J. A. & Kingston, R. E. Occupying chromatin: Polycomb mechanisms for getting to genomic targets, stopping transcriptional traffic, and staying put. Mol. Cell 49, 808–824 (2013)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Blackledge, N. P. et al. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and polycomb domain formation. Cell 157, 1445–1459 (2014)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Farcas, A. M. et al. KDM2B links the Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) to recognition of CpG islands. eLife 1, e00205 (2012)
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  14. Wu, X., Johansen, J. V. & Helin, K. Fbxl10/Kdm2b Recruits Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 to CpG Islands and Regulates H2A Ubiquitylation. Mol. Cell 49, 1134–1146 (2013)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Pickart, C. M. & Pickart, C. M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 70, 503–533 (2001)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Plechanovová, A., Jaffray, E. G., Tatham, M. H., Naismith, J. H. & Hay, R. T. Structure of a RING E3 ligase and ubiquitin-loaded E2 primed for catalysis. Nature 489, 115–120 (2012)
    ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Pruneda, J. N. et al. Structure of an E3:E2∼Ub Complex Reveals an Allosteric Mechanism Shared among RING/U-box Ligases. Mol. Cell 47, 933–942 (2012)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Dou, H., Buetow, L., Sibbet, G. J., Cameron, K. & Huang, D. T. BIRC7–E2 ubiquitin conjugate structure reveals the mechanism of ubiquitin transfer by a RING dimer. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 876–883 (2012)
    CAS Google Scholar
  19. Deshaies, R. J. & Joazeiro, C. A. P. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 399–434 (2009)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Buchwald, G. et al. Structure and E3-ligase activity of the Ring–Ring complex of polycomb proteins Bmi1 and Ring1b. EMBO J. 25, 2465–2474 (2006)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  21. Luger, K., Mäder, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F. & Richmond, T. J. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 389, 251–260 (1997)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Bentley, M. L. et al. Recognition of UbcH5c and the nucleosome by the Bmi1/Ring1b ubiquitin ligase complex. EMBO J. 30, 3285–3297 (2011)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  23. Mattiroli, F., Uckelmann, M., Sahtoe, D. D., van Dijk, W. J. & Sixma, T. K. The nucleosome acidic patch plays a critical role in RNF168-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2A. Nat. Commun. 5, 3291 (2014)
    ADS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Olsen, S. K. & Lima, C. D. Structure of a ubiquitin E1–E2 complex: insights to E1–E2 thioester transfer. Mol. Cell 49, 884–896 (2013)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  25. Vasudevan, D., Chua, E. Y. D. & Davey, C. A. Crystal structures of nucleosome core particles containing the ‘601’ strong positioning sequence. J. Mol. Biol. 403, 1–10 (2010)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Leung, J. W., Agarwal, P., Canny, M. D., Gong, F. & Robison, A. D. Nucleosome acidic patch promotes RNF168-and RING1B/BMI1-dependent H2AX and H2A ubiquitination and DNA damage signaling. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004178 (2014)
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  27. Barbera, A. J. et al. The nucleosomal surface as a docking station for Kaposi’s sarcoma herpesvirus LANA. Science 311, 856–861 (2006)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Makde, R. D., England, J. R., Yennawar, H. P. & Tan, S. Structure of RCC1 chromatin factor bound to the nucleosome core particle. Nature 467, 562–566 (2010)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  29. Armache, K. J., Garlick, J. D., Canzio, D., Narlikar, G. J. & Kingston, R. E. Structural basis of silencing: Sir3 BAH domain in complex with a nucleosome at 3.0 Å resolution. Science 334, 977–982 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  30. Kato, H. et al. A conserved mechanism for centromeric nucleosome recognition by centromere protein CENP-C. Science 340, 1110–1113 (2013)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  31. Hieb, A. R., D'Arcy, S., Kramer, M. A., White, A. E. & Luger, K. Fluorescence strategies for high-throughput quantification of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e33 (2012)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Reverter, D. & Lima, C. D. Insights into E3 ligase activity revealed by a SUMO-RanGAP1–Ubc9–Nup358 complex. Nature 435, 687–692 (2005)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  33. Wenzel, D. M., Lissounov, A., Brzovic, P. S. & Klevit, R. E. UBCH7 reactivity profile reveals parkin and HHARI to be RING/HECT hybrids. Nature 474, 105–108 (2011)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  34. Kalb, R., Mallery, D. L., Larkin, C., Huang, J. T. J. & Hiom, K. BRCA1 is a histone-H2A-specific ubiquitin ligase. Cell Rep. 8, 999–1005 (2014)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  35. Brzovic, P. S., Rajagopal, P., Hoyt, D. W., King, M. C. & Klevit, R. E. Structure of a BRCA1-BARD1 heterodimeric RING-RING complex. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 833–837 (2001)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Zhou, Z. et al. NMR structure of chaperone Chz1 complexed with histones H2A.Z-H2B. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 868–869 (2008)
    CAS Google Scholar
  37. Tan, S., Kern, R. C. & Selleck, W. The pST44 polycistronic expression system for producing protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr. Purif. 40, 385–395 (2005)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Lowary, P. T. & Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 276, 19–42 (1998)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J. T. & Richmond, T. J. T. Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones. Methods Enzymol. 304, 3–19 (1999)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  40. D’Arcy, A., Mac Sweeney, A. & Haber, A. Practical aspects of using the microbatch method in screening conditions for protein crystallization. Methods 34, 323–328 (2004)
    PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Kabsch, W. XDS. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 125–132 (2010)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  42. Evans, P. Scaling and assessment of data quality. Acta Crystallogr. D 62, 72–82 (2006)
    PubMed Google Scholar
  43. McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  44. Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53, 240–255 (1997)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the _CCP_4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235–242 (2011)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  46. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  47. Brünger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921 (1998)
    PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  49. Arnaudo, N. et al. The N-terminal acetylation of Sir3 stabilizes its binding to the nucleosome core particle. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1119–1121 (2013)
    CAS Google Scholar
  50. Tachiwana, H. et al. Crystal structure of the human centromeric nucleosome containing CENP-A. Nature 476, 232–235 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Iwasaki, W. et al. Contribution of histone N-terminal tails to the structure and stability of nucleosomes. FEBS Open Bio. 3, 363–369 (2013)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  52. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W. & Moss, D. S. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993)
    CAS Google Scholar
  53. The. PyMOL Molecular Graphics System v. 1.7.0.5 (Shrödinger, LLC, 2014)
  54. Lebedev, A. A. et al. JLigand: a graphical tool for the _CCP_4 template-restraint library. Acta Crystallogr. D 68, 431–440 (2012)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the staff of APS NE-CAT beamlines 24ID-E and 24ID-C for their assistance during synchrotron data collection; H. Yennawar, N. Yennawar and J. Fecko at the Penn State Huck Institute X-ray core facility; A. Minns, M. Moore and J. Malloy for reagent preparation; T. Girish and J. Huang for assistance with data collection; S. Wang for providing U2OS cDNA; R. Makde and members of the Tan laboratory and the Penn State Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation for discussions. This work was supported by NIGMS grants GM060489-09S1, GM088236 and GM111651 to S.T. R.K.M. is supported by a Damon Runyon Post-doctoral fellowship (DRG 2107-12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Eukaryotic Gene Regulation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802, Pennsylvania, USA
    Robert K. McGinty, Ryan C. Henrici & Song Tan
  2. Schreyer Honors College, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802, Pennsylvania, USA
    Ryan C. Henrici

Authors

  1. Robert K. McGinty
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Ryan C. Henrici
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Song Tan
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.K.M. designed the study, cloned, purified and crystallized macromolecules, collected and processed X-ray data, refined and analysed the structure, performed nucleosome ubiquitylation and binding assays, and wrote the paper. R.C.H. cloned, purified and crystallized macromolecules and performed nucleosome ubiquitylation assays. S.T. designed the study, cloned and purified macromolecules, collected X-ray data, analysed the structure and edited the paper. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toSong Tan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Alignment of PRC1 ubiquitylation module and NCP with previously determined sub-structures and comparison of the two halves of the structure.

a, Alignment of PRC1 ubiquitylation model from the proximal (darker colours) and distal (lighter colours) halves of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module–NCP structure with the previously determined structure of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module alone22 (grey, PDB code 3RPG) using all backbone atoms. b, c, A similar alignment using the Ring1B–Bmi1 subcomplex (b) or UbcH5c only (c). d, Alignment of the NCP from the PRC1 ubiquitylation module–NCP core particle complex (coloured) and the previously determined NCP complex25 (PDB code 3LZ0) containing the identical 601 nucleosome positioning sequence. e, R.m.s.d. for each of the alignments calculated over all backbone atoms. f, g, Orthogonal views of an alignment of two copies of the complex following rotation of one copy about the pseudo-two-fold axis of symmetry of the nucleosome. This was accomplished by simultaneously aligning each histone in one copy to its symmetry related counterpart in the other copy. For visualization, the PRC1 ubiquitylation module from one copy of the structure is depicted with lighter colours. h, Zoomed view of the alignment showing PRC1 ubiquitylation module–NCP interface. The proximal and distal PRC1 ubiquitylation modules are shown in dark and light colours, respectively. Hinge indicated by arrows. i, R.m.s.d. for each of the components following alignment of the two halves as described above. j, Buried surface area calculations for the indicated interfaces on the proximal and distal sides of the structure.

Extended Data Figure 2 Characterization of fused and unfused UbcH5c.

a, Coomassie-stained gel of E1-mediated ubiquitin transfer to UbcH5c(Cys85Lys) mutant (UbcH5c‡) alone and in the context of the fused PRC1 ubiquitylation module. Ubiquitin is transferred by the E1 Uba1 to the UbcH5c mutant in an ATP-dependent manner, black arrow (lanes 1 and 2). No ubiquitin transfer to the fused PRC1 ubiquitylation module is observed (lanes 3 and 4, expected band position for Ring1B–UbcH5c–ubiquitin conjugate indicated by a blue arrow). The Cys85Lys mutant was used to assist in visualization of the UbcH5c–ubiquitin stable isopeptide conjugates. b, Ring1B of the fused PRC1 ubiquitylation module (blue) clashes with ubiquitin in the E1 Uba1 adenylation site (green). Alignment of UbH5c subunit of PRC1 ubiquitylation module22 (PDB code 3RPG) to Ubc4 in Ubc4–Uba1–ubiquitin structure24 (PDB code 4II2). Ubc4 and Uba1 are shown in pink and grey, respectively. c, Intrisic activity of wild-type and mutant UbcH5c enzymes. Time-course of UbcH5c-ubiquitin thioester aminolysis after lysine addition. Reactions quenched with non-reducing loading buffer unless 100 mM DTT addition is indicated (dagger). Asterisk denotes a non-reducible product.

Extended Data Figure 3 Comparison of the proximal and distal Ring1B–, Bmi1– and UbcH5c–nucleosome interfaces.

a–c, Identical views of Ring1B–Bmi1 saddle from proximal (a) and distal (b) halves of structure and overlay (c). d–g, Ring1B–histone interface views, including zoom out (d) with box indicating field of view depicted in magnified panels from proximal (e) and distal (f) halves of structure and overlay (g). h–k, Similar views of Bmi1–histone interface. l–s, Similar views of UbcH5c–DNA interfaces. t–u, 2_mF_o − DF_c difference Fourier transform electron density maps for the Ring1B–nucleosome interface contoured at 1.0_σ on the proximal (t) and distal (u) sides of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module–NCP structure. v, w, Similarly contoured electron density map for the proximal (v) and distal (w) Bmi1–nucleosome interface. All views are identical to those depicted in Figs 2 and 3.

Extended Data Figure 4 Chromatin factors use an arginine-anchor to bind the H2A–H2B acidic patch.

a–e, Identical views of E3 ligase Ring1B (blue) (a), viral LANA peptide (purple, PDB code 1ZLA; ref. 27) (b), chromatin factor RCC1 (purple, PDB code 3MVD; ref. 28) (c), centromeric protein CENP-C (green, PDB code 4INM; ref. 30) (d) and silencing protein Sir3 (brown, PDB code 3TU4; ref. 29) (e) each bound to the acidic patch. Conserved arginine is shown in space-filling representation. Other arginines involved in binding are shown as sticks. UbcH5c and the Ring1B loop between residues 81 and 98 are not shown for figure clarity.

Extended Data Figure 5 Ring1B–Bmi1- and BRCA1–BARD1-mediated ubiquitylation of nucleosomes containing histone mutations.

a, b, Coomassie-stained gels of ubiquitylation assays using nucleosomes with the specified histone mutants, E1 Uba1, E2 UbcH5c, STR-His10 tagged ubiquitin and Ring1B–Bmi1 (a) or BRCA1–BARD1 RING heterodimers (b). Tagged H2B (STR-His6) was used to prevent electrophoretic comigration with unmodified H2A. Experiment was repeated twice.

Extended Data Figure 6 Fluorescence-based nucleosome ubiquitylation and binding assays.

a, Fluorescence-based nucleosome ubiquitylation assay. Left, ubiquitylation assays performed with nucleosomes labelled with Oregon Green 488 maleimide on H2A(Thr10Cys) mutant (H2A T10C-OG488). Right, replicates 1, 2 and 3 of wild-type assay run on four different gels and quantified to demonstrate reproducibility across gels. Data are mean and s.d., n = 4. b, Fluorescence-based nucleosome binding assay. Top left, nucleosomes labelled with Oregon Green 488 on H2B(Ser112Cys) mutant (H2B S112-OG488). Top right, binding of PRC1 ubiquitylation module leads to partial quenching of the fluorophore allowing affinity measurements to be made. Bottom, three technical replicates of fused wild-type PRC1 ubiquitylation module are shown to demonstrate reproducibility. Mean and s.d. shown for each data point, n = 3.

Extended Data Figure 7 Effects of PRC1 ubiquitylation module mutants on nucleosome ubiquitylation and binding.

a, Representative gel of one replicate of ubiquitylation assay using E1 Uba1, UbcH5c, STR-His10 tagged ubiquitin, NCPs, and E3 Ring1B–Bmi1 with the indicated Ring1B mutants stained with Coomassie (left) and scanned for fluorescent H2A (right). NCPs in the experiment are doped with NCPs containing the H2A(Thr10Cys) mutant labelled with Oregon Green 488 maleimide. b, Quantitation of mono-ubiquitylated (H2Aub1, dark blue), di-ubiquitylated (H2Aub2, blue) and tri-ubiquitylated (H2Aub3, light blue) H2A are shown as a fraction of total H2A. Data are mean and s.d. from three technical replicates. Samples from the same experiment were analysed on different gels, processed in parallel. c, Fluorescence quenching binding curves for fused PRC1 ubiquitylation modules containing the indicated mutations of Ring1B (coloured as shown). Mean and s.d. are shown for each data point, n = 3. Fluorescence is normalized to fit values for unbound and saturated NCPs. Concentrations depicted using log scale. d–l, Experiments as described above for indicated Bmi1 mutants (d–f), UbcH5c charge reversal mutants (g–i) and UbcH5c alanine mutants (j–l). Triplicate ubiquitylation assays were repeated at least twice.

Extended Data Figure 8 Alignment of Bmi1 paralogues and E2s.

a, Sequence alignment of segments of Bmi1 with PCGF (Polycomb group RING finger) paralogues also found in PRC1. b, Sequence alignment of UbcH5c and other E2s known to be active (green) or inactive (red) or of unknown compatibility with Ring1B–Bmi1-mediated nucleosomal ubiquitylation. Key residues discussed in the text are indicated with an asterisk.

Extended Data Figure 9 Linker DNA increases the affinity of the PRC1 ubiquitylation modules for the nucleosome.

a, Linear B-form duplex DNA modelled onto the DNA ends of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module–NCP structure. b, The UbcH5c α4 helix occupies the major groove of modelled linker DNA. Several basic and aromatic side chains line the DNA-adjacent face of the α4 helix. c, Linker DNA enhances nucleosomal binding of fused PRC1 ubiquitylation module. Fluorescence quenching binding curves for the wild-type fused PRC1 ubiquitylation module binding to nucleosomes centred on 147-bp (black, grey and light grey) or 185-bp (blue and light blue) 601 DNA. Technical replicates performed on different days are depicted in different shades of grey and blue. Mean and s.d. are shown for each data point, n = 3. Fluorescence is normalized to fit values for unbound and saturated NCPs. Concentrations depicted using log scale.

Extended Data Figure 10 BRCA1 requires similar loop region and H2A–H2B acidic patch for nucleosome ubiquitylation.

a, Alignment of the BRCA1–BARD1 and Ring1B–Bmi1 heterodimers using the RING domains of BRCA1 from the BRCA1–BARD1 NMR structure35 (PDB code 1JM7) and Ring1B. BRCA1 and BARD1 are shown in orange and purple, respectively. Cα atoms of essential arginine residues are indicated by spheres. b, Sequence alignment of Ring1B and BRCA1 shows conserved nucleosome interacting loop. c, BRCA1(Lys70Ala/Arg71Ala) mutation eliminates E3 ligase activity of BRCA1–BARD1 RING heterodimer. Representative gel of one replicate of ubiquitylation assay using E1 Uba1, E2 UbcH5c, STR-His10 ubiquitin, NCPs, and E3 BRCA1–BARD1 with the indicated mutants stained with Coomassie and scanned for fluorescent H2A. NCPs in the experiment are doped with NCPs containing the H2A(Thr10Cys) mutant labelled with Oregon Green 488 maleimide. d, Quantification of mono-ubiquitylated (H2Aub1, dark orange), di-ubiquitylated (H2Aub2, orange) and tri-ubiquitylated (H2Aub3, light orange) H2A are shown as a fraction of total H2A. Mean and s.d. from three technical replicates are depicted. Ubiquitylation assay was repeated twice.

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGinty, R., Henrici, R. & Tan, S. Crystal structure of the PRC1 ubiquitylation module bound to the nucleosome.Nature 514, 591–596 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13890

Download citation