The binary protein-protein interaction landscape of Escherichia coli (original) (raw)

• Arifuzzaman, M. et al. Large-scale identification of protein-protein interaction of Escherichia coli K-12. Genome Res. 16, 686–691 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Butland, G. et al. Interaction network containing conserved and essential protein complexes in Escherichia coli. Nature 433, 531–537 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hu, P. et al. Global functional atlas of Escherichia coli encompassing previously uncharacterized proteins. PLoS Biol. 7, e96 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Rual, J.F. et al. Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Nature 437, 1173–1178 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yu, H. et al. High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Science 322, 104–110 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Titz, B. et al. The binary protein interactome of Treponema pallidum–the syphilis spirochete. PLoS ONE 3, e2292 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Uetz, P. et al. Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science 311, 239–242 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rajagopala, S.V. et al. The Escherichia coli K-12 ORFeome: a resource for comparative molecular microbiology. BMC Genomics 11, 470 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Rajagopala, S.V. & Uetz, P. Analysis of protein-protein interactions using high-throughput yeast two-hybrid screens. Methods Mol. Biol. 781, 1–29 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Goll, J. et al. MPIDB: the microbial protein interaction database. Bioinformatics 24, 1743–1744 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rajagopala, S.V. et al. MPI-LIT: a literature-curated dataset of microbial binary protein–protein interactions. Bioinformatics 24, 2622–2627 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Braun, P. et al. An experimentally derived confidence score for binary protein-protein interactions. Nat. Methods 6, 91–97 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.C., Rajagopala, S.V., Stellberger, T. & Uetz, P. Exhaustive benchmarking of the yeast two-hybrid system. Nat. Methods 7, 667–668 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Vidalain, P.O., Boxem, M., Ge, H., Li, S. & Vidal, M. Increasing specificity in high-throughput yeast two-hybrid experiments. Methods 32, 363–370 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Venkatesan, K. et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat. Methods 6, 83–90 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Barrios-Rodiles, M. et al. High-throughput mapping of a dynamic signaling network in mammalian cells. Science 307, 1621–1625 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rajagopala, S.V., Sikorski, P., Caufield, J.H., Tovchigrechko, A. & Uetz, P. Studying protein complexes by the yeast two-hybrid system. Methods 58, 392–399 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Berman, H.M. et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Barabasi, A.L. Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science 325, 412–413 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Collins, S.R. et al. Functional dissection of protein complexes involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction map. Nature 446, 806–810 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Du, Z., Payattakool, R., Yu, P.S. & Chen, C.J. A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms. Bioinformatics 23, 1274–1281 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Aloy, P. et al. Structure-based assembly of protein complexes in yeast. Science 303, 2026–2029 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lasker, K. et al. Integrative structure modeling of macromolecular assemblies from proteomics data. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 1689–1702 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Babu, M. et al. Genetic interaction maps in Escherichia coli reveal functional crosstalk among cell envelope biogenesis pathways. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002377 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bandyopadhyay, S., Kelley, R., Krogan, N.J. & Ideker, T. Functional maps of protein complexes from quantitative genetic interaction data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000065 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Beltrao, P., Cagney, G. & Krogan, N.J. Quantitative genetic interactions reveal biological modularity. Cell 141, 739–745 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Boone, C., Bussey, H. & Andrews, B.J. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 437–449 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Costanzo, M. et al. The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327, 425–431 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Butland, G. et al. eSGA: E. coli synthetic genetic array analysis. Nat. Methods 5, 789–795 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Brohee, S. & van Helden, J. Evaluation of clustering algorithms for protein-protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 488 (2006).
  Article Google Scholar
• Babu, M. Quantitative genome-wide genetic interaction screens reveal global epistatic relationships of protein complexes in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet. (in the press).
• Oliver, D.B. & Beckwith, J. E. coli mutant pleiotropically defective in the export of secreted proteins. Cell 25, 765–772 (1981).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rajagopala, S.V. et al. The protein network of bacterial motility. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3, 128 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bershtein, S., Mu, W., Serohijos, A.W., Zhou, J. & Shakhnovich, E.I. Protein quality control acts on folding intermediates to shape the effects of mutations on organismal fitness. Mol. Cell 49, 133–144 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dixon, S.J., Costanzo, M., Baryshnikova, A., Andrews, B. & Boone, C. Systematic mapping of genetic interaction networks. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 601–625 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Typas, A. et al. Regulation of peptidoglycan synthesis by outer-membrane proteins. Cell 143, 1097–1109 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Matthews, L.R. et al. Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or “interologs”. Genome Res. 11, 2120–2126 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sharan, R. et al. Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1974–1979 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Singleton, M.R., Dillingham, M.S., Gaudier, M., Kowalczykowski, S.C. & Wigley, D.B. Crystal structure of RecBCD enzyme reveals a machine for processing DNA breaks. Nature 432, 187–193 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cingolani, G. & Duncan, T.M. Structure of the ATP synthase catalytic complex (F(1)) from Escherichia coli in an autoinhibited conformation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 701–707 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hallez, R., Letesson, J.J., Vandenhaute, J. & De Bolle, X. Gateway-based destination vectors for functional analyses of bacterial ORFeomes: application to the Min system in Brucella abortus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 1375–1379 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gavin, A.C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631–636 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Faith, J.J. et al. Many Microbe Microarrays Database: uniformly normalized Affymetrix compendia with structured experimental metadata. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, D866–D870 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nichols, R.J. et al. Phenotypic landscape of a bacterial cell. Cell 144, 143–156 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hagberg, A.A. et al. Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference 11–15 (2008).
• Xu, Z. & Hao, B. CVTree update: a newly designed phylogenetic study platform using composition vectors and whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W174–W178 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Alix, B., Boubacar, D.A. & Vladimir, M.T.-R.E.X. a web server for inferring, validating and visualizing phylogenetic trees and networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, W573–W579 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Remm, M., Storm, C.E. & Sonnhammer, E.L. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041–1052 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar