Engaging the Global South on climate engineering research (original) (raw)

References

  1. National Research Council Climate Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth (National Academies, 2015).
  2. Gardiner, S. in Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (eds Gardiner, S., Caney, S., Jamieson, D. & Shue, H.) 284–315 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).
    Google Scholar
  3. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty RS Policy Document 10/09 (Royal Society, 2009).
  4. Winickoff, D. E. & Brown, M. B. Time for a government advisory committee on geoengineering research. Issues Sci. Technol. 29(4) (2013).
  5. Rayner, S. et al. The Oxford Principles. Clim. Change 121, 499–512 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Task Force on Climate Remediation Research Geoengineering: A National Strategic Plan for Research on the Potential Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Consequences of Climate Remediation Technologies (Bipartisan Policy Center, 2011).
  7. The Regulation of Geoengineering: Fifth Report of Session 2009–2010 (House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 2010).
  8. Hamilton, C. Geoengineering and the politics of science. Bull. Atom. Sci. 70, 17–26 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Hulme, M. Can Science Fix Climate Change? A Case Against Climate Engineering (Polity, 2014).
    Google Scholar
  10. Corner, A. & Pidgeon, N. Geoengineering the climate: The social and ethical implications. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 52, 24–37 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Guston, D. H. & Sarewitz, D. Real-time technology assessment. Technol. Soc. 24, 93–109 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Schot, J. & Rip, A. The past and future of constructive technology assessment. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 54, 251–268 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Carr, W. A. et al. Public engagement on solar radiation management and why it needs to happen now. Clim. Change 121, 567–577 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Renn, O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. M. Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse (Springer, 1995).
    Book Google Scholar
  15. Fiorino, D. J. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 15, 226–243 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Wilsdon, J. & Willis, R. See-Through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream (Demos, 2004).
    Google Scholar
  17. Stirling, A. 'Opening up' and 'closing down': Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 33, 262–294 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25, 739–755 (1993).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Bellamy, R., Chilvers, J., Vaughan, N. E. & Lenton, T. M. A review of climate geoengineering appraisals. WIREs Clim. Change 3, 597–615 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Experiment Earth: Report on a Public Dialogue on Geoengineering (Natural Environment Research Council, 2010).
  21. Pidgeon, N., Parkhill, K., Corner, A. & Vaughan, N. Deliberating stratospheric aerosols for climate geoengineering and the SPICE project. Nature Clim. Change 3, 451–457 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Corner, A., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N. & Vaughan, N. E. Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 938–947 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Macnaghten, P. & Szerszynski, B. Living the global social experiment: An analysis of public discourse on solar radiation management and its implications for governance. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 465–474 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Wright, M. J., Teagle, D. A. H. & Feetham, P. M. A quantitative evaluation of the public response to climate engineering. Nature Clim. Change 4, 106–110 (2014).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Mercer, A. M., Keith, D. W. & Sharp, J. D. Public understanding of solar radiation management. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 044006 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Governance of Research on Solar Geoengineering: African Perspectives Consolidated Report of Three Workshops in Senegal, South Africa, and Ethiopia (African Academy of Sciences and SRMGI, 2013).
  27. Solar Radiation Management: The Governance of Research (Environmental Defense Fund, Royal Society and TWAS, 2011).
  28. Perspectives on Climate Engineering from Pacific Small Island States IASS Workshop Report (Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, 2014).
  29. Wynne, B. Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science. Public Underst. Sci. 1, 281–304 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Collins, H. M. & Evans, R. The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Soc. Stud. Sci. 32, 235–296 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Epstein, S. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge (Univ. California Press, 1996).
    Google Scholar
  32. Parthasarathy, S. Breaking the expertise barrier: Understanding activist strategies in science and technology policy domains. Sci. Public Policy 37, 355–367 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Keith, D. W., Duren, R. & MacMartin, D. G. Field experiments on solar geoengineering: Report of a workshop exploring a representative research portfolio. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140175 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Corbin, J. M. & Strauss, A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual. Sociol. 13, 3–21 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Macnaghten, P. et al. Responsible innovation across borders: Tensions, paradoxes and possibilities. J. Responsible Innov. 1, 191–199 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Reynolds, J. A critical examination of the climate engineering moral hazard and risk compensation concern. Anthr. Rev. 8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053019614554304 (2014).
  37. Bunzl, M. Researching geoengineering: Should not or could not? Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045104 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Keith, D. W., Parson, E. & Morgan, G. M. Research on global sun block needed now. Nature 463, 426–427 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Corner, A. & Pidgeon, N. Geoengineering, climate change scepticism and the 'moral hazard' argument: An experimental study of UK public perceptions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372, 20140063 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Long, J. C. S., Loy, F. & Morgan, M. G. Policy: Start research on climate engineering. Nature 518, 29–31 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  41. Keith, D. W. & Hulme, M. Climate science: Can geoengineering save the world? The Guardian (29 November 2013).
  42. Lovett, R. Geoengineering won't curb sea-level rise. Nature News http://doi.org/dttd33 (2010).
  43. Kravitz, B. et al. A multi-model assessment of regional climate disparities caused by solar geoengineering. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 074013 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Tilmes, S. et al. The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP): The hydrologic impact of geoengineering. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 118, 11036–11058 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Morgan, G. M. & Ricke, K. Cooling the Earth through Solar Radiation Management: The Need for Research and an Approach to its Governance (International Risk Governance Council, 2010).
    Google Scholar
  46. Parson, E. A. & Keith, D. W. End the deadlock on governance of geoengineering research. Science 339, 1278–1279 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  47. Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H. & Braman, D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J. Risk Res. 14, 147–174 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Shapin, S. A Social History of Truth (Univ. Chicago Press, 1994).
    Book Google Scholar
  49. Miller, C. A. New civic epistemologies of quantification: Making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability. Sci. Technol. Hum. Val. 30, 403–432 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Miller, C. A. Democratization, international knowledge institutions, and global governance. Governance 20, 325–357 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Pielke, R. A. Jr & Sarewitz, D. Bringing society back into the climate debate. Popul. Environ. 26, 255–268 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Sarewitz, D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ. Sci. Policy 7, 385–403 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Benedick, R. E. Considerations on governance for climate remediation technologies: Lessons from the 'ozone hole'. Stanf. J. Law Sci. Policy 4, 6–9 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  54. Climate Engineering: Technical Status, Future Directions, and Potential Responses (U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2011).
  55. Parkhill, K. & Pidgeon, N. Public Engagement on Geoengineering Research: Preliminary Report on The SPICE Deliberative Workshops Understanding Risk Working Paper 11–01 (Cardiff University School of Psychology, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  56. Pidgeon, N. et al. Exploring early public responses to geoengineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4176–4196 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  57. Merk, C., Pönitzsch, G., Kniebes, C., Rehdanz, K. & Schmidt, U. Exploring public perceptions of stratospheric sulfate injection. Climatic Change 130, 299–312 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  58. Pilot Workshop on Governing Geoengineering in the 21st Century: Asian Perspectives (RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security Studies, 2011).

Download references